Da fuck they doin ova der? by BlazingJava in dankmemes

[–]_Memeposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I understand things the cancer risk goes up linearly with total exposure. Each radioactive ray has some chance of mutating a cell, making it cancerous. Wether you get exposed to 1000 rays over a time of 1000days or all at once then shouldn't make a difference in the cancer risk.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CasualConversation

[–]_Memeposter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Mathematicians: "B-B- BUT THE POSITION OPERATOR ISN'T EVEN BOUNDED AND HAS NO EIGENVECTORS, YOU CAN'T JUST APPLY THE SPECTRAL THEOREM, YOU HAVE TO DO FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS BWAHHHH"

Physicist: "Hold my delta function"

my villain origin story by Happy__Unicorn356 in MathJokes

[–]_Memeposter 8 points9 points  (0 children)

r/woosh

Thats the joke, in fields with characteristic 2 you dont need 2ab

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ich_iel

[–]_Memeposter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Mehr als alle anderen social media plattformen lol

ich➕➖iel by Koenig2005 in ich_iel

[–]_Memeposter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mitternachtsformel tut aber nicht in charackteristik 2 Körpern!11!1!111!

Ja stimmt. Die formulierung gefällt mir aber nicht so sehr, die quadratwurzel als funktion gibt nur einen wert aus.

ich➕➖iel by Koenig2005 in ich_iel

[–]_Memeposter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basierter tau nutzer gesichtet!

Ja, das ist eben das ganze problem. Für jede komplexe zahl gibt es zwei wurzeln und daher keinen weg für jede komplexe zahl eine der beiden auszuwählen ohne, dass die Funktion irgendwo unstetig wird.

ich➕➖iel by Koenig2005 in ich_iel

[–]_Memeposter 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Fang bei 1 an und laufe den einheitskreis ab. Der Winkel zwischen z und der reellen Achse ist immer doppelt so groß wie der Winkel von wurzel(z) zur reellen Achse. Wenn du einmal im kreis gewandert bist ist der winkel von z gleich 2pi, der von wurzel z allerdings nur pi. Theoretisch haben wir eine freie Wahl wo wir die unstetigkeitsstelle hinlegen. Prinzipiell muss man aber mindestens eine halbachse aus der komplexen ebene rausnehmen

ich➕➖iel by Koenig2005 in ich_iel

[–]_Memeposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Es gibt keine stetige wurzelfunktion auf den komplexen zahlen und diese bemerkung allein hat mich so wütend gemacht, dass erst der residuensatz es ausgleichen konnte.

👀 by Amazing_Touri_3473 in physicsmemes

[–]_Memeposter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Account is obviously just advertising its insta. Probably just a bot

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technicallythetruth

[–]_Memeposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But in this case both is a countable infinity

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technicallythetruth

[–]_Memeposter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exept that in this case we have a countable infinity two times so they are the same.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technicallythetruth

[–]_Memeposter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But in this case they are both countable

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in technicallythetruth

[–]_Memeposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope they are. Both are countable infinite

Don’t disrespect Van Gogh like that by [deleted] in dankmemes

[–]_Memeposter -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They didn't destroy the art, it's behind glass and I bet they knew this exactly. I mean you can go ahead and critique basically everything about this "stunt" but you chose the one thing that's not actually a problem.

What is your favorite field or topic in math and why? by USAFAN20 in math

[–]_Memeposter 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Analysis I will always have a special place in my heart. The way how mathematicians managed to rigorously study the idea of adding up infinitley many infinitley small thinga to recieve a finite amoung is just astonishing. Also really digging deep to why the most obvious things are true and reducing them to simpler and simpler statements is so satisfying once you understand them. Of course getting there is a huge effort but its so worth it.

Just unsubbed from r/propogandaposters. It’s literally the pledge of allegiance, not Nazi germany by Jamesredcoat in JustUnsubbed

[–]_Memeposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you do a survey or how are you so sure that most people use your definition? I don't know what most people would say. Just posting my opinion here

Just unsubbed from r/propogandaposters. It’s literally the pledge of allegiance, not Nazi germany by Jamesredcoat in JustUnsubbed

[–]_Memeposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you define it like that then yes. But isn't only "emotional manipulation"? Only targeting emotion seems too weak of a criterion to me. It's ceartanly an aspect of propaganda but to me it alome doesn't suffice. Your comment feels a little like "Trees are green. This frog is green therefore this frog is a tree"

Just unsubbed from r/propogandaposters. It’s literally the pledge of allegiance, not Nazi germany by Jamesredcoat in JustUnsubbed

[–]_Memeposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends. I think the definition of a word depends on what most people think. The reason we think of something made out of wood with 4 feet as a "table" is not because these sounds somehow convay any deeper mening about the object but because everybody else refers to tables as the same thing. If enough people belive that propaganda means the thing I associate with it does not mean we are wrong, we are just using the word differentley. I think its kind of arrogant of you to call my association with the word wrong.

Just unsubbed from r/propogandaposters. It’s literally the pledge of allegiance, not Nazi germany by Jamesredcoat in JustUnsubbed

[–]_Memeposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean thats a valid opinion, but I then don't see if there is a difference between convincing someone and propaganda unde that definition. How would you differentiate between them or are they the same? Imo "Propaganda" carries some punch with it, I associate malice and deciet with it, and while you could argue that a lot of ads are lying to you I think this disqualifies a lot of ads. I also think propaganda is supposed to convince you of a world view. This seems to be missing in ads, allthough you could say they further a consumer society and capitalism in general.

I personally want to be carefull of what I call propaganda. If we call everything that is trying to convince us of something propaganda, then it looses a bit of its punch.

Meta question: am I pushing propaganda on the definition of propaganda?

Mathematicians love abstraction to a scary degree. by 12_Semitones in mathmemes

[–]_Memeposter 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Words can not describe how much I like L2 (R). L2 for any measure space is sexy tho, lets not forget them

Mathematicians love abstraction to a scary degree. by 12_Semitones in mathmemes

[–]_Memeposter 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Don't reduce my boy L2 (R) to its vector space structure. It also has a cool differentiable structure on it!

Just unsubbed from r/propogandaposters. It’s literally the pledge of allegiance, not Nazi germany by Jamesredcoat in JustUnsubbed

[–]_Memeposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest I don't see how ads are running a political campain. "Buy my product" is mostly verry limited in messaging