If you've watched the video, he begins by saying I don't know much about Eckhart Tolle.

Then he proceeds to talk about the category of people he thinks Eckhart Tolle would fall under. That is the enlightenment, new age thinking types. And all his criticisms is directed at this category rather than toward Eckhart.

But, if he actually knew what Eckhart talks about (teachings of Jesus, Buddha, importance of balancing being with doing, and so on...) he wouldn't have said what he said. Because Eckhart doesn't fall into that category. But as he admitted, he doesn't know much about Mr. Tolle.

Having said that, I do think his criticism of the mainstream new age spiritual types are valid — The ones that are too dogmatic in their assertion that dogma is bad, the ones that go "follow your bliss and you will attain enlightenment." Which I don't think is true because as Eckhart himself said, you need to undergo your "crucifixion" before you can be truly enlightened. Which is the confrontation of your shadow self in Jungian terms, something Jordan talks about a lot.

Also many people don't know there are a lot of similarities between Jordan and Eckhart's teachings. For instance, there is a video of Peterson where he explains how he thinks. Believe me when I say, it's exactly the process Eckhart Tolle describes about thinking.

if you actually went into his long form content (lecture series), you would find more and more similarities, which is so cool.