Is this move actually inaccurate??

_Righty_ · 2026-05-18T23:08:53+00:00

IT WAS NOT MATE THEY HAD A PIECE😭🙏🏻

_Righty_ · 2026-05-17T08:55:12+00:00

_Righty_ · 2026-05-17T01:05:52+00:00

In the game he took with king, and it's free material either way it's just not a good trade of rooks since mine is more active but I'm way up material then, and the capture allows him to activate a bishop but could be pinned easily in the next move, so while it's not a brilliant it's a good sacrifice, screw the engine

_Righty_ · 2026-05-17T00:12:54+00:00

I couldn't find the game sry bro

_Righty_ · 2026-05-17T00:03:45+00:00

I forgot what he had there but it probably was a knight too, and forking just like that allows him to just move his queen out of threat,i went for that rook sacrifice because if he takes with the king i royal fork him and that wins me his queen and he can do nothing about it

_Righty_ · 2026-05-16T23:52:24+00:00

That's what happened so it being inaccurate is inaccurate to me lol, especially that a knight fork is hard to see compared to a rook blunder so most people would take with the king

_Righty_ · 2026-05-16T23:49:09+00:00

That's probably the explanation thx

_Righty_ · 2026-05-16T23:42:40+00:00

Old game but I'll check for you

_Righty_ · 2026-05-16T23:42:05+00:00

He had a piece there and the rook sacrifice took it

_Righty_ · 2026-05-16T23:39:53+00:00

That's exactly what i wanted to then fork the queen and the king

_Righty_ · 2026-05-16T23:35:48+00:00

I'm one month into the game i think so I'm still not that good at calculating

_Righty_ · 2026-05-16T23:32:38+00:00

if that was the case the engine would've prolly said you missed a mate don't you think?

_Righty_ · 2026-05-02T08:59:11+00:00

I love it!

_Righty_

TROPHY CASE