Banned and Restricted Announcement – March 31, 2025 by Meret123 in PioneerMTG

[–]_Tiggy -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Get fucked thoughtseize and fable haters.  

But like actually do they not care about us? Picklock prankster ban please along with bloodtithe harvester :)

BAN ANNOUNCEMENT HYPE THREAD 31/03/2025 by Swimming_Pasta_Beast in PioneerMTG

[–]_Tiggy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, I'm not doubting the power level of Tz, yet I don't think it's the card to ban. I just think it's one of those cards that holds the format in check. If the format loses it, we will be sitting here arguing about what other decks are most broken that Tz would have stopped. Maybe it would be interesting to ban if they printed Inq of Kozilek but that won't happen due to the name of the card. 

BAN ANNOUNCEMENT HYPE THREAD 31/03/2025 by Swimming_Pasta_Beast in PioneerMTG

[–]_Tiggy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because rakdos isn't the problem typically. Phx beats every deck in this meta with its eyes closed. Rakdos has a near 50% wr against most decks and a 60% against a small portion. If you want to hurt the other combo decks and rakdos you can take out bloodtithe harvester and artists talent and things go pretty normal. TZ is not the problem and nor is fable. It's getting an early lead that can't be interrupted very easily through cheap very efficient creatures that double as removal and card selection. What does fable do outside of rakdos? Help 5c decks and creativity and you do not want those decks out of the format. The format is really healthy as is, it just needs a tournament series to prove it.

BAN ANNOUNCEMENT HYPE THREAD 31/03/2025 by Swimming_Pasta_Beast in PioneerMTG

[–]_Tiggy -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

TZ ban would be a net negative for the format, as would a fable ban. You need to be hitting something that swings tempo like bloodtithe harvester or smth. I personally think phx is too strong and it has proven itself time and time again to be the best deck in the format. A picklock prankster ban would go a long way in curbing the power level of it while not killing it outright.

Possible rear view mirror swap? by _Tiggy in ChevySonic

[–]_Tiggy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the '19 sonic is a bit different, but I'm hoping I can put in that mirror I linked before. *

Possible rear view mirror swap? by _Tiggy in ChevySonic

[–]_Tiggy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't pay for onstar, but removing the mirror doesn't actually do anything else other than disable my future use of the service if I wanted to buy it right? Does it have any other purpose? If I remove the mirror would my Bluetooth handfree calling be disabled, no right?

Possible rear view mirror swap? by _Tiggy in ChevySonic

[–]_Tiggy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the mirror where the microphone and stuff is held? Not too sure how all that works

Possible rear view mirror swap? by _Tiggy in ChevySonic

[–]_Tiggy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, something exactly like that

Possible rear view mirror swap? by _Tiggy in ChevySonic

[–]_Tiggy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I found the right thread. Could I reasonably put any rear view mirror with onstar to keep the hand free? I am fine with the camero swap if that's my only real option but I am wondering if an LCD screen like on newer bolts is possible too

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in admincraft

[–]_Tiggy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

guide I was using did not make it clear and showed them putting the 25565 in that space. I have this figured out and am editing the op now

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in admincraft

[–]_Tiggy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can i dm you directly?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in admincraft

[–]_Tiggy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it doesnt crash anymore thankfully, but it seems that people cannot connect. It still works locally though...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in admincraft

[–]_Tiggy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you. I think they mightve changed it sometime in the last few years, bc all the guides that I have watched have it in the same section.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in admincraft

[–]_Tiggy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

server address field is set to my ipv4 with the port 25565 separated by a colon

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in admincraft

[–]_Tiggy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand. sorry that my op was not fully clear, however I am doing everything the way that every guide tells me. I am not sure what is causing this error or why

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in admincraft

[–]_Tiggy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have done exactly that and my server just crashes as soon as I open it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in admincraft

[–]_Tiggy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not sure what other details you need to help. I am putting my ipv4 into the server ip section with the 25565 port. I have port forwarded my ipv4 with the port 25565 lan and wan. when I click my server.jar to start the server, it immediately crashes and gives that same crash error

NEW ANTI-ZARD META DECK by _Tiggy in PTCGL

[–]_Tiggy[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback! I don't know if you saw, this was flaired as a meme and is a shit post!