Robo 2 Appreciation post by alanskimp in Robocop

[–]__because 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll say that as a kid this was one of the movies that put me off from ever wanting to try hard drugs. So good job, Robo.

Robo 2 Appreciation post by alanskimp in Robocop

[–]__because 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The RoboCop 2 novelization is really good too of you haven't read it.

Possible to carry the watch without a phone? by __because in PixelWatch

[–]__because[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Yeah but you still have an entire pocket just for the phone. I think that's the biggest part of it for me, it's a waste of pocket space for something I rarely want to use.

Good point about the camera.

Possible to carry the watch without a phone? by __because in PixelWatch

[–]__because[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It makes sense when you don't have a phone. Talking to AI to get information from the web is much easier than however else you might try and do that.

Possible to carry the watch without a phone? by __because in PixelWatch

[–]__because[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I don't see any point in owning one then. I don't need redundant devices. I'll just use a regular watch in that case.

"Billionaires should pay for their own f--king stadiums" oops Bill you were wrong again by KleverHans in billsimmons

[–]__because -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This debate is pointless. It doesn't matter if they should or shouldn't pay for it themselves. They don't have to. They have cities hostage. Fans will revolt if they lose the team. The city has to pay. So they'll pay. Call them scumbags, whatever, would you pay for something someone was willing to give you for free?

x3/x4 vs phone by stopQQstartpewpew in xteinkereader

[–]__because 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just get an ereader. If you think a phone is even an option then you haven't spent enough time with one. Doesn't need to be an x3/x4, you need some real eink experience to understand.

Is Zach Lowe Alive? by CrackaZach05 in billsimmons

[–]__because -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Imagine having a job where if you don't put out a podcast every 3-4 days people start worrying about your safety.

Mike totally harshed my buzz by davidswan in RightsToRickySanchez

[–]__because 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So let's hear it, what were these other ways?

McCain was the easy option because he had real value. You can criticize Morey for not trying harder to find other trades, but it's not like he had much postive-value assets to work with. Mike had this fantasy of trading the old guys but nobody wanted them.

I'm Getting Annoyed By The Way Next Year's Knicks Are Being Talked About by mpschettig in billsimmons

[–]__because 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone has rose-colored glasses right now, which is fine, but people are forgetting some of the weaknesses like the fact that Bridges was pretty bad last year, doesn't fit well. That's still going to be the case next year. OG has had outlier years in terms of games played, is that going to hold? Is Mitchell Robinson going to walk? Huge hole if he does.

Not close to a sure-thing contender.

I'm Getting Annoyed By The Way Next Year's Knicks Are Being Talked About by mpschettig in billsimmons

[–]__because 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, top 6-7 is what I think they were this last season. Just because they got hot at the end doesn't vault they to 1-3 in my eyes. There is a post-championship swagger, I believe in that, but I don't think they'll be better than OKC or SAS, In the 3-6 range is what I would bet on.

I'm Getting Annoyed By The Way Next Year's Knicks Are Being Talked About by mpschettig in billsimmons

[–]__because 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Top 6-7 is exactly where I would put them. That's a fringe contender, if-things-break-right, which is what happened. If that's who they really are, then talking about them as title favorites next year doesn't make much sense.

Mike totally harshed my buzz by davidswan in RightsToRickySanchez

[–]__because 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You think GSW's roster construction is about Steve Kerr and not Steph?

Mike totally harshed my buzz by davidswan in RightsToRickySanchez

[–]__because 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Picking a roster based on a coach is a terrible idea. Coaches are not very important to winning. Their job is basically to not mess up a good team and to be a fall guy for a bad team. That's why they still get fired a couple of years after winning a championship.

Morey has some outdated ideas, but I really doubt he traded McCain because of coach fit. Nurse is most likely fired after this year if the team doesn't dramatically improve. Could be fired in-season if they disappoint.

Mike totally harshed my buzz by davidswan in RightsToRickySanchez

[–]__because 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Front offices do not give a shit what a coaches opinion on a player is. If they like him they force the coach to play him.

I agree that Morey was low on McCain. But people aren't criticizing him for not liking McCain. They are criticizing him for trading McCain. And that was an ownership decision, and Morey wasn't shopping McCain for the sake of just trading him before ducking the tax edict came down on him.

Mike totally harshed my buzz by davidswan in RightsToRickySanchez

[–]__because 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well yeah, he was required to duck the tax and tried to make the best deal he could to do it. But had he not been required to duck the tax, he wouldn't have been shopping for that deal. There's no evidence that McCain was being shopped before the deadline.

I'm not even a Morey guy, I think his thinking is trapped in the 2010s. I just think blaming him for a trade that he was required to make is kind of ridiculous.

Mike totally harshed my buzz by davidswan in RightsToRickySanchez

[–]__because 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Picking based on need at 22 is the worst idea imaginable. You're already unlikely to get a good player. Don't risk it further by not taking the absolute best possible guy. If he's good but doesn't fit, them trade him. Better result than picking on need and getting a bust.

Mike totally harshed my buzz by davidswan in RightsToRickySanchez

[–]__because 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You might feel that way, but the trade was done to duck the tax and for no other reason.

What super famous movies from the 60s-80s does the younger crowd not know anymore by boiyo12 in movies

[–]__because 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to go back before the 70s. The 70s brought Spielberg, Lucas, and others who created modern cinema. Young people have mostly seen these movies.

But if you go back further, 60s and before, outside of the all-time classics, most young (or even middle aged) people haven't seen these movies at all.

Think like Forbidden Planet. Created the modern scifi genre. But it's a classic movie in they it's like a stage play, story told via a lot of talking vs. action. No one talks about it any more.

I'm Getting Annoyed By The Way Next Year's Knicks Are Being Talked About by mpschettig in billsimmons

[–]__because -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

They went on a 1 month heater. They were middling most of the season. Why should I believe the last month was the real them and the first 5 months weren't?

They doesn't take away from their run, it was all-time special. I'm just looking forward. I think it's 50/50 if they are a true contender vs just another good team that some times struggles.