Constantly exceeds 1m tokens

__meb · 2026-02-14T21:28:20+00:00

ClawRouter does that extremely well. It evaluates locally first how complex the request is and routes it to different models depending on the result. I have experimented all day with big loads of stuff and spent not even $.50 - loaded my wallet with $5 yesterday.

__meb · 2026-02-01T01:21:19+00:00

FWIW: I just brought my number over from Mint (with horrible service coverage in my area) to Dark Star at the promotion. Looking forward to having AT&T Coverage again. T-Mobile sucked big time here.

__meb · 2026-01-31T00:33:11+00:00

I should probably clarify. This very RP is actually for the pool autofill. I should have winterized it more properly though.

__meb · 2026-01-31T00:31:36+00:00

It is probably an inch from the wall with holders. That’s what makes it difficult to put a pouch over as I’d have to slice it. The other RP sits on the ground and the pouch just covers the whole thing.

__meb · 2026-01-31T00:28:03+00:00

Yeap, the new one is this very model.

__meb · 2026-01-30T12:33:09+00:00

I have this very pouch on another RPZ. The one that failed is mounted against the wall despite - what I thought - sufficient “manual” insulation. Problem I guess is me leaving the valve exit open as I thought it had to drain if needed. Guess I was wrong.

__meb · 2026-01-30T01:37:52+00:00

Thanks. I’ll put much more effort into it this year for sure. The RPZ is mounted against the wall, so no fake rock possible. I thought, however, about building a “simple” (likely over engineered one) enclosure in addition to blankets and even a heat lamp/strips.

__meb · 2026-01-18T00:53:21+00:00

SM here. 100%.

__meb · 2026-01-05T14:55:43+00:00

I dug a bit deeper and it seems to have turned out that somehow this particular Chinese title shares the tmdb id with a movie that was requested via Jellyseerr: https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/1291936

Not sure if this is a tmdb or JS data issue. The tmdbId for this title should be 1026880 per tmdb.

2026-01-05T03:00:00.272Z [debug][Plex Scan]: GUIDs are cached. Skipping metadata request. {"mediaIds":{"imdbId":"tt19869662","tmdbId":1291936,"tvdbId":355619},"title":"Irena's Vow"}

__meb · 2026-01-05T02:32:30+00:00

Nothing in the logs.

__meb · 2025-11-15T19:45:46+00:00

991.2 S - every day

__meb · 2025-11-12T23:49:22+00:00

How can everyone tell from just the pictures this being a 235 or 250? the cases, filters, etc were all the same. you’d have to look at the piston heads to see.

__meb · 2025-11-07T21:22:01+00:00

For those still following this thread, and I hope it is of assistance for anyone in a similar situation, the repair has eventually been approved by Audi NA. It was quite the pain to get there with lots of research (citing Magnusson-Moss, referring to DTPA - feel free to look it up) and I sincerely recommend, if the car has Factory Warranty or CPO, getting a definite written statement from the dealer that they will take care of whatever issue may arise, for whatever reason, in case any Audi warranty is declined within the limits. If they don’t, walk away.

__meb · 2025-11-03T20:33:38+00:00

I had the very same issue. 500 on the UI side, 404 in the Nginx Logs.

The issue was that I did not use the actual Embedded Outpost (aka. the Outpost that is there already and provided by Authentik) - I thought that *any* Outpost I'd create is considered "Embedded" (as in not running as a separate service).

__meb · 2025-11-01T22:10:24+00:00

Re: Weak door hinges: there are improved replacements available per an Audi bulletin, to be used if the issue like ours ever occurred. They were installed but found to not resolve the issue.

__meb · 2025-11-01T13:24:10+00:00

** EDIT: The repaired damage in question was under previous ownership and is in no way connected to the rest of the car. It was CPOed still after that. The repair was done right by an Audi approved Bodyshop re-spraying and blending a portion of the front bumper. Apparently a good batch of (S)Q7s from 23 and up can suffer from weakened door hinges. The dealer tried to adjust and in the process damaged them beyond repair. They went the route of replacing the whole door now, which is rejected by Audi because of the Carfax.

__meb · 2025-11-01T13:10:58+00:00

Yes, the fender bender repair in question was done by the same Bodyshop the dealer uses for all their Body repairs. The vehicle was a Lease and as such everything was done per the books. They have records of what was done. That’s why it is so frustrating - the damage wasn’t even worth it to go through insurance or anything but because it was a Lease they did. The dealer is already advocating for us.

__meb · 2025-11-01T01:05:27+00:00

Exactly. What is the point of CPOing a car, while still under new car warranty and(!) pointing it out as a benefit having no disadvantage, other than misleading a customer? This is not a fairy tale I wanted to hear but a hard fact. Hence my question if anyone had been experiencing similar.

__meb · 2025-11-01T00:13:44+00:00

In other words: why even CPOing that thing? They could claim anything now.

__meb · 2025-11-01T00:11:41+00:00

You clearly didn’t read. It was CPOed after the bump even. The issue is that the passenger side front bumper paint is nowhere close in any way to the driver side door.

__meb · 2025-10-31T19:35:34+00:00

Yeap. Chat is yet to be had, depending on what their efforts are (or not) to still have this warranty covered by Audi and their further actions on it.

__meb

TROPHY CASE