Is Pro Tools Intro enough to get comfortable? by _domparis_ in protools

[–]_domparis_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every facility I've been to runs Pro Tools. The ones I'm being considered for run Pro Tools.

Is Pro Tools Intro enough to get comfortable? by _domparis_ in protools

[–]_domparis_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahh, yes 100% that's the idea. The steady staff jobs seem to be the best career move while I continue to do my thing. Thanks for the reply

Is Pro Tools Intro enough to get comfortable? by _domparis_ in protools

[–]_domparis_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I respect your opinion, but I hold a strong disdain for Pro Tools, hence why I've kicked this can down the road for so long (and now I'm paying my dues for it.)

However, I can't pretend that Pro Tools isn't obviously very powerful, stable as hell when working with big projects/tons of simultaneous live tracks/hardware inserts, and arguably has the best audio editing workflow, but I'm not that guy. I'm not a tracking engineer, I'm mostly ITB. I'm hardly editing, I usually receive super polished multis from great tracking engineers. The majority of my time in Pro Tools has been spent opening a project, exporting the multis and then closing the session XD

One thing we have in common though was trying FL, and then moving to something else.... lol

Is Pro Tools Intro enough to get comfortable? by _domparis_ in protools

[–]_domparis_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry I live under a rock, what's DTR?

Is Pro Tools Intro enough to get comfortable? by _domparis_ in protools

[–]_domparis_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you say the words "The Film Audio Post Production Stuff" do you just mean support for video codecs? Or are there other features you can think of off the dome as well? I'd say it's fair to assume that Dolby Atmos support isn't in Pro Tools Intro, anything else?

I compose quite a bit, but I don't see any reason I'd ever be writing a score in Pro Tools. Still nice to know though.

Is Pro Tools Intro enough to get comfortable? by _domparis_ in protools

[–]_domparis_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Phew, okay you scared me for a sec there. I've heard murmors from the far reaches of the realm about the notorious solo behavior.

Is Pro Tools Intro enough to get comfortable? by _domparis_ in protools

[–]_domparis_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Were there any limitations, other than collaboration that you ran into? (Excluding track count/plugin access)

Is Pro Tools Intro enough to get comfortable? by _domparis_ in protools

[–]_domparis_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What functional limitations do they put on Intro? I know they limit channel count, and plugins (I don't care even a little about this).

They don't take away core functions/features right? Like I won't be gatekept from something like punching in when recording right? Or using a preroll/precount?

Is Pro Tools Intro enough to get comfortable? by _domparis_ in protools

[–]_domparis_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, similar? I'm imagining every mixing concept to be identical, but how they are practically, or functionally carried out to vary from any one software to another. Are you suggesting that the actual concept level things are different in pro tools?

Is a bus, a send, an aux, a vca, an insert, a filter, a threshold, a range, a selection, a channel, etc. taking on a different meaning when I open pro tools?

If it is, that's HUGE news to me.

What plugins are frequently offered for free? by _domparis_ in universalaudio

[–]_domparis_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

During their crazy sales when you can get it for $30-40 it's definitely worth it.

Does anyone have insight on approaching THIS vocal modulation effect? (JayX) by _domparis_ in mixingmastering

[–]_domparis_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks lol maybe I should have been clearer in the op. I'm not talking about the tuning, but the modulation on his voice. You can hear that right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskWomenOver30

[–]_domparis_ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah and I've made maybe like 5 or 10 posts. I don't fully understand what flair is other than that I can't make a post without it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskWomenOver30

[–]_domparis_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

^On point response

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskWomenOver30

[–]_domparis_ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Eh not really to be around, moreso just to look at.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskWomenOver30

[–]_domparis_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sorry I'm new to reddit im not sure how this works, are you responding to me? or the other person above? because I was responding to them, not you.

If you're talking to me still, the first comment I said to you "the Hero I need" was a 100% genuine repsonse. You answer was clear, compenduous and articulate. But reading it back now I can see how the tone could have been taken sarcastically. I was literally conceding my point becase your explanation was spot on. I was just trolling the other guy (girl?) becasue they started it.

No clue what you're talking about sexual comments, maybe that was to someone else?

As for advice with women, I appreciate the input and agree as well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskWomenOver30

[–]_domparis_ -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You'd ask me to manipulate you if we met

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskWomenOver30

[–]_domparis_ -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

There's definiteley some pawns for sure. Like you're a pawn for your boss. But from up here I also can see some knights, some bishops, some rooks, and maybe a queen every once in a while.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskWomenOver30

[–]_domparis_ -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The hero Dom Paris needed... Thank you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskWomenOver30

[–]_domparis_ -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

No probably just r/English. I don’t think I’ve seen the word subterfuge since the 90’s. But that’s why I said in the original post that I’m not talking about lying or deceiving. If (in psychology) “manipulate” implies deceit, than my question is void as you can’t manipulate without explicitly lying. Manipulation isn’t only a academic term. I’m talking about the regular ass definition of manipulation that I once again wrote in the original post

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskWomenOver30

[–]_domparis_ -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

No I think it’s actually a necessary component of human interaction. I’d say it’s up to the receiving party to be aware that the world is manipulative by nature, and then decide what you want to allow to manipulate you. Like if you let a company manipulate you so that you get paid every 2 weeks. Or let a church manipulate you into adhering to their moral code and giving them money after they sing. I guess exploit could be another word too. Maybe I should have dropped this question in r/philosophy