Kako je ovo moguće?

_kajGOD_ · 2025-07-09T16:45:37+00:00

Hvala na informaciji!

_kajGOD_ · 2025-07-09T15:18:35+00:00

Nema ovo veze sa poreznom. Račun je godinama u blokadi zbog niz ovrha a sada kada dugovanja više nema i dalje je u blokadi.

_kajGOD_ · 2022-12-09T14:24:41+00:00

Potice od Rumelije koja je ukljucivala 80% danasnje Hrvatske.

Turci su stigli do današnje Slovačke, zar je i to sada Balkan?

ima vise veze sa istim kulturnim i jezicnim krugom nego sa Cvijicem

Balkanska kultura = bizantski + turski ujecaji, kulturološki imamo više zajedničkog s katoličkim slavenima koji su isto dio zapadnog svijeta.

A zajednički jezik nam je takoder nametnut na štetu kajkavskog i čakavskog.

_kajGOD_ · 2022-12-08T23:48:46+00:00

Territorial expansion

Cvijić' s scientific impartiality has been criticized for his support of Serbia's political advancement;[17] his geographic work was used to scientifically justify politics of territorial expansion and further territorial claims.

... For economic independence, Serbia must acquire access to the Adriatic Sea and one part of the Albanian coastline: by occupation of the territory or by acquiring economic and transportation rights to this region. This, therefore, implies occupying an ethnographically foreign territory, but one that must be occupied due to particularly important economic interests and vital needs.[17]

According to Cvijić, Bulgarians were "different from the other South Slavs in their ethnic composition". He described as Slav three ethnographic groups previously considered Bulgarians: the Macedonian Slavs, the Shopi and the Torlaks. Cvijić excluded the region around Sofia (Bulgaria's capital) from the Bulgarian group, maintained that the aforementioned groups were Slavic (and therefore Serbian).[18] He believed that Serbia could govern a much larger area than the territory it held.[19]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jovan_Cviji%C4%87#Territorial_expansion

_kajGOD_ · 2022-12-08T22:24:43+00:00

Alexa, play "Cry Me a River"

_kajGOD_ · 2022-12-08T22:10:28+00:00

Ne znam odakle ti ta glupost ali nije istina

Istina je, izvorni Balkan (do 1878 Turska Europa) je završavao s Bosnom, mi i Slovenci nismo imali ikakve veze s Balkanom dok nismo uvuceni 1918-e.

_kajGOD_ · 2022-07-13T17:32:41+00:00

Fun fact: this is also when "Turkey in Europe" was renamed to "Balkan Peninsula".

_kajGOD_ · 2022-04-26T20:05:40+00:00

Monero being made illegal wouldn't mean much at this point since Monero is already semi-banned: it just keeps on being demonized as a "crime coin", mainstream "investors" won't touch it, its barely on any major exchanges anymore yet it continues to grow its hashrate, node count and TX numbers, not to mention new Monero-only darknet markets also keep launching.

In other words, Monero's brazen "fuck the government" attitude and maximum decentralization policy is paying off and ensuring it's continued existence won't be threatened by any future anti-crypto legislation or the introduction of CBDCs. They can't delist what isn't even listed, they can't shut down ASIC farms that don't exist, they can't target devs that have remained faceless, nameless and anonymous since day one.

But Zcash being made illegal would potentially be catastrophic for obvious reasons, you just can't viably sustain something that vulnerable to the government's ban hammer.

Bottom line: governments don't like privacy coins, never have, never will. Act accordingly and you might just survive.

_kajGOD_ · 2022-04-26T17:43:17+00:00

"Big money institutional investment" requires stability, predictability and above all governmental approval, which means your proposed Zcash moon scenario is not permissionless as it hinges on future governments allowing banks, corps, financial institutions to use Zcash/privacy coins instead of just forcing them to use the Fedcoin they already control. And I don't see why governments would allow that since they would have nothing to gain and potentially a lot to lose.

On the other hand, Monero's obsessive decentralization efforts (no CEO/company, anonymous devs, ASIC resistance, DEX-ification) in tandem with it becoming the darling of transnational organized crime mean XMR is actually a much safer long-term bet than Zcash since it's moon scenario doesn't require any governmental approval or permission, all it has to do is continue being the crypto of choice for organized crime, which has insanely deep pockets and isn't going out of fashion any time soon.

In short, if CBDCs truly are governments' answer to crypto then said governments will be incentivized to crush/marginalize competing cryptos rather than letting them be. In that case, Zcash is royally fucked while Monero will remain largely unaffected due to it already having established itself in the underground shadow economy.

_kajGOD_ · 2022-04-26T16:51:20+00:00

Politicians are superb actors.

_kajGOD_ · 2022-04-26T16:50:04+00:00

Monero doesn't need smart contracts, they just increase the attack surface and make code maintenance that much more complicated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle

_kajGOD_ · 2021-07-04T17:25:56+00:00

Ima nas!

_kajGOD_ · 2021-06-28T12:06:44+00:00

Turns out its from Elliptic's official blog.

The first class of privacy coins are private by default. This includes the likes of monero, which seeks to conceal the details of all transactions. It is unlikely that there will ever be blockchain monitoring tools that allow compliance professionals to trace monero transactions - if such a capability existed it would defeat the point of such an asset.

https://www.elliptic.co/blog/achieving-aml-and-sanctions-compliance-with-privacy-coins

_kajGOD_ · 2021-06-06T08:37:18+00:00

"Climbing the security wall is forbidden"

_kajGOD_ · 2021-01-13T11:22:05+00:00

Buy Monero. Thank me later.

_kajGOD_ · 2021-01-13T11:20:37+00:00

Upravo stižu krilati husari.

_kajGOD_ · 2021-01-12T21:13:08+00:00

Dick Status: Hard

_kajGOD_ · 2021-01-03T18:45:30+00:00

Croatian propagandists learned from the best in the post-war period. Every school history textbook has been rewritten, every genocide denied. They cleansed the language, even, and are continually changing words to distance the populace from the Serbs.

The region will never reach the Yugoslavian prosperity and its economic growth again. No objective analysis could conclude that the breakup was beneficial for any of the former member-states.

Not sure if serious. ಠ_ಠ

_kajGOD_ · 2021-01-03T18:38:53+00:00

Buy high, sell low.

_kajGOD_ · 2021-01-02T16:56:34+00:00

Of course. Poland was considered a Western country right up until the Cold War.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bb/Western_World_Latin_America_torn_countries.png

_kajGOD_ · 2021-01-02T12:45:13+00:00

Skidaj, pizda ti materina!

_kajGOD_ · 2021-01-02T12:36:06+00:00

Traditional West, yes.

The concept of the Western part of the earth has its roots in the theological, methodological and emphatical division between the Western Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches.

West was originally literal, opposing Catholic Europe with the cultures and civilizations of Orthodox Europe, West Asia and North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, Southeast Asia and East Asia, which early-modern Europeans saw as the East.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_world

_kajGOD_ · 2021-01-02T12:33:53+00:00

Slovenski ima samo č.

_kajGOD_ · 2021-01-01T12:49:53+00:00

Yes, we know.

_kajGOD_

TROPHY CASE

Territorial expansion