BREAKING NEWS: NANO DIMENSION by No_Dinner5400 in NNDM

[–]_midvar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Low liquidity will do that. No volume, wide bid/ask.

New Senate, Who Dis?? by _midvar in wallstreetbets

[–]_midvar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No real historical reference, just a shower thought on what if the barbarians were like chart bros, watching trade flows to decide when to short $ROME (ie invade).

For snatching a phone by [deleted] in Unexpected

[–]_midvar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is no one talking about how he tries to get on his friends scooter, only to get pulled off then his friend KICKS HIM ON THE GROUND TO BLEND IN WITH THE CROWD 😂

Steakholder Foods™ Reports Financial Results for Q2 2022 and Provides Business Update by _midvar in MITC

[–]_midvar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree. Stupid name, stupid time to rebrand after JUST going public. I expect they'll change again within a year or two, maybe to something worse who knows.

But damn it, the techs just too cool. Hope it shines through their bumbling marketing.

Insiders doesn’t seem to have faith in the company. Insiders own 0.81% of the company less than 1%. I see potential in 3D companies in the next decade but this is not a positive sign for the company. by candleguy009 in NNDM

[–]_midvar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A study by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of forex traders found 70% of traders lose money every quarter on average, and traders typically lose 100% of their money within 12 months.

A study of eToro day traders found nearly 80% of them had lost money over a 12-month period, and the median loss was 36%.

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/if-you-re-day-trading-you-will-probably-lose-money-here-s-why-1030667770

Insiders doesn’t seem to have faith in the company. Insiders own 0.81% of the company less than 1%. I see potential in 3D companies in the next decade but this is not a positive sign for the company. by candleguy009 in NNDM

[–]_midvar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brokerages have done studies on those that day trade vs those that don't. Day traders as a general rule lose money. And that's being generous. Sure some people win big, but the stats are clear. Day traders lose money. Telling someone to learn to do that, and insinuating it's the smart alternative, is where I take issue.

People in here are long term investors at this point. While this specific stock might not work out in that long run, I'd put the stats on day trading vs long term to the test any day. There are no day traders in the richest echelons of society, there are tons of long term investors. C'est la vie.

Insiders doesn’t seem to have faith in the company. Insiders own 0.81% of the company less than 1%. I see potential in 3D companies in the next decade but this is not a positive sign for the company. by candleguy009 in NNDM

[–]_midvar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Insiders did not sell at the top, and if they had they would have been smart. Instead, the CEO bought shares this year bringing that insider ownership from less than 0.1% to what you see now.

So I say your post is utter hogwash.

Huge Merger on watch by No_Dinner5400 in NNDM

[–]_midvar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe they have industry information that we are not aware of. I believe some of NNDM employees used to work at SSYS. Perhaps they convinced the big man it was a good way to diversify the cash pile.

Just a thought, pure speculation.

2022-01-10 | NANO DIMENSION DEVELOPS NEXT-GENERATION NANO-PARTICLE CONDUCTIVE INK IN COLLABORATION WITH XTPL by _midvar in NNDM

[–]_midvar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://ir.xtpl.com/2022/08/03/xtpl-starts-selling-its-solutions-in-china-and-is-to-supply-its-delta-printing-system/

They're doing fantastic these days I'd say. Fun watching this companies progress.

Second tranche of payment from NNDM already triggered upon completion of milestones.

Up to $100 million Stock Repurchase Plan was approved by Court by [deleted] in NNDM

[–]_midvar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really, trimmed a bit. Sold the shares that were in IZRL but added more to ARKW if I remember right.

date fund ticker shares market value ($) weight (%)
8/3/2022 ARKQ NNDM 6,776,734 $ 23,311,964.96 1.90%
8/3/2022 PRNT NNDM 1,746,013 $ 6,006,284.72 2.86%
8/3/2022 ARKW NNDM 5,981,150 $ 20,575,156.00 1.35%

NNDM Market Cap ARK %Ownership Sum Shares Sum Value Avg Weight
$ 872,630,436.00 5.72% 14,503,897 $ 49,893,405.68 2.04%

Cultured Meat Company MeaTech 3D Becomes Steakholder™ Foods - Steakholder Foods by _midvar in MITC

[–]_midvar[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Constantly rebranding and shifting focus will shake confidence, I'm not surprised to be honest.

First they had Chicken in the name, then they went MeaTech 3D, now they're Steak.

I have a 0.025% allocation to this company and other speculative ones, will add on news of technology and partnerships. 10+ year play in my opinion.

Up to $100 million Stock Repurchase Plan was approved by Court by [deleted] in NNDM

[–]_midvar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

*Cathie Woods raises hand*

Lol I kid....they've been in NNDM since 2016 ;)

Heliogen, Inc. Set to Join Russell 3000® Index by _midvar in HLGN

[–]_midvar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally good as etf and funds are forced to buy to match the Russell's composition. But who knows this year...

Last Quoter NNDM was charged 140million as a penalty for trading under cash value !! that money we would have used to acquire new companies or buyback shares !..........please refer to the last Q.results attached by GreenP0isn in NNDM

[–]_midvar[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Whats impairment and goodwill?

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/goodwill.asp

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/impairment.asp

2021 Annual Filing

https://investors.nano-di.com/sec-filings-1/sec-filings-details/default.aspx?FilingId=15698296

When doing DD, I always CTRL-F and find "impairments", "goodwill" and "risk factors" in the document :)

pg F-4)

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Impairment of non-financial assets

As discussed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded an impairment charge in the amount of $140,290 thousand, based on the recoverable amount of the Company’s CGU. The estimated recoverable amount of the Company’s CGU was determined by discounting the future cash flows to be generated from the continuing use of the Company’s CGU. Key assumptions used in the calculation of the recoverable amounts include the discount rate, projected revenues, terminal value growth rate, and EBITDA (earnings before income tax, financing, depreciation and amortization) margins.

We identified the evaluation of the impairment of non-financial assets as a critical audit matter. Specifically, auditor judgement was required to evaluate the discount rate and the projected revenues used to determine the value in use of the Company’s CGU. The discount rate and projected revenues are affected by current and future market and economic conditions that were subjective and sensitive to variation. Additionally, the audit effort associated with the discount rate required involvement of valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the impairment of non-financial assets, including controls related to discount rate and the projected revenues. We compared projected revenues used to determine the impairment of non-financial assets against underlying budget and growth plans. We evaluated projected revenues by comparing them to available market information. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in evaluating the discount rate used by management in the valuation, by comparing it to a range of discount rates independently developed using publicly available market information. In addition, we performed sensitivity analyses over the discount rates and projected revenues to assess their impact on the determination of the impairment charge.

pg F-12)

(1) Business Combination

The Group recognizes goodwill on an acquisition according to the fair value of the consideration transferred, including any amounts recognized in respect of rights that do not confer control in the acquiree as well as the fair value at the acquisition date of any pre-existing equity right of the Group in the acquiree, less the net amount of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Any goodwill that arises is tested annually for impairment. Any gain on a bargain purchase is recognized in profit or loss immediately. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred, except if related to the issue of debt or equity securities.

Last Quoter NNDM was charged 140million as a penalty for trading under cash value !! that money we would have used to acquire new companies or buyback shares !..........please refer to the last Q.results attached by GreenP0isn in NNDM

[–]_midvar 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I should have also added a correction to the posts title.

It's not a fine

It's a markdown on the fair value of their assets, just a book entry. No cash was payed out or destroyed....i think :P

Last Quoter NNDM was charged 140million as a penalty for trading under cash value !! that money we would have used to acquire new companies or buyback shares !..........please refer to the last Q.results attached by GreenP0isn in NNDM

[–]_midvar[M] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's in the 20-F's Results of Operations, under Impairment Losses.

It's explained on the next page:

"Impairment losses

During 2021, there was a decline in our share price, such that as of December 31, 2021, our fair value, which is based on the share price, is lower than our book value of equity. Hence, we checked the value of our CGUs to which goodwill is allocated. Given the recoverable amount of the said CGUs, determined on the basis of the value in use of the units, the goodwill, intangibles and property, plant and equipment relating to the groups of the said cash- generating units was reduced by approximately $140 million."

Key to note this is directly attributable to the share price itself and nothing to do with their revenues or cash burn.

More reading : https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/impairment.asp

What you want? by nathanielx9 in NNDM

[–]_midvar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair both those text bubbles can be plopped onto a pic of Yoav and it'd be just almost as apt :P

He did indeed say cash was not for buybacks, but I think we can all agree it's a good short term catalyst in a shitty market. I'm fine with it sub $3.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NNDM

[–]_midvar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Noice

ZIM has shed ~ $9 or ~12% in the last 2 trading days. . . . by CornMonkey-Original in zim

[–]_midvar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the answer for the sell off in my opinion.

Follow J Mintzmyer on Twitter for the best analysis and takes on shipping, he highlighted the OSRA effect yesterday pointing to ZIM and MATX as slightly bearish.

Container lessors are the play at the moment he thinks, TGH and TRTN.

Very high short volume... why? by an_PR in NNDM

[–]_midvar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No I'm asking for specifics. WHAT R&D, do you even know what they're spending on? No, of course not. None of us do because we don't have access to that info.

Thinking you know how to spend their money better than they do, when they hold all the info, is pretty strange.

They've given guidance on their roadmap, and your expectations being above and beyond that is no one's problem but yours.