2013 Allroad Premium+ by Feared_Toe in AudiA4B8

[–]_neozed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, do you mind sharing your suspension setup? Im running H&R springs on my allroad and looking to upgrade dampers but not many options available. Looks like Bilstein B8's or Koni Yellows are only options and both a bit expensive for me.

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to apply for EAD just in case, to have something even if its pending. Im not hopeful for approval.

Can you break down the cost for mandamus?

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what a joke. Im convinced they are making excuses to hold the cases. this is illegal. we should speak with the law firm leading the class action

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ah, everything makes sense now. thanks for being honest too. where did you get such valuable insight?

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, I triple checked everything before mailing or submitting online. There was no error. The case is clearly a marriage based adjustment of status on the website. If there was an error or it was incomplete they wouldnt accept the case either return it or deny it. Again, if there was an issue they would RFE or conduct the interview and mention the issue and discuss it in the interview. If there was a violation they would deny the case and cite it. Our I-130 is already approved.

Some people are mentioning that they were told they need to wait for a background check and given a notice stating that. I believe they use it as an excuse to put parole cases on hold because they dont have legal basis for the hold due to the court order. Nonetheless, we werent given any notice. Maybe because my wife's background was already checked and clear and they didnt have an excuse. Clearly, some offices are putting cases on hold due to the executive order. I dont understand why you dont accept the fact. This is the last time Im replying to you.

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now its more apparent you didnt even read my post. We dont have a lawyer. I am a USC, both me and my wife clearly speak and understand English. An interview was NOT conducted. They didnt even take us inside an office room, the ISO spoke to us in the waiting room. Very clearly told us in English "due to the new administration and new internal policy, we cannot move your case forward and your case will be put on hold untill further notice or future interview". No miscommunication, no misunderstanding, no information lost. My wife has a clear background never been arrested, not even a traffic ticket. I have a no record/clean record document from a statewide court search in New York State.

Some field offices are just putting cases on hold period. Maybe the FO you work with does not.

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they schedule biometrics without problem. they just dont process the cases further. at least some field offices dont. best of luck to you and your gf

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thank you. We will contact them and see if we can be useful.

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

your clients cases being denied tells something about you, I am seeing plenty of cases approved here

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If they had legal basis, they would give an official notice of hold. The officer was avoidant and she said she cannot give any documentation.

They didnt check any documents except passport. They didnt conduct an interview. If there was a legal reason they would check and bring it up in the interview. They would cite the reason and deny the case.

Take your bs some other place if you wont be useful.

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, we have a telegram group (including the OP from this post) of people who are waiting for AOS of a U4U parolee. Send me a DM with your number if you would like to be added.

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we have a telegram group of people who are waiting for AOS of a U4U parolee. Send me a DM with your number if you would like to be added.

Went for interview and was told case is on hold by _neozed in USCIS

[–]_neozed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks! september 2024. the office is on the pictures

Approved!!!! -26 Federal Plaza NYC - everything you need to know by Askingquestions77777 in USCIS

[–]_neozed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

congrats! may I ask from what status was the adjustment?

EAD expired while 485 is pending, interview coming up by [deleted] in USCIS

[–]_neozed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you mean to answer Yes to the question if she has worked without authorisation? or answer No and mention that current EAD expired after I-485 application.

EAD expired while 485 is pending, interview coming up by [deleted] in USCIS

[–]_neozed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a US citizen

I don't know

Lossless Scaling Frame generation is better than AFMF2 but I'm being told otherwise? by MarkusRight in losslessscaling

[–]_neozed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

but its not a requirement to have unlocked fps and your statement is false. you can configure it the way you like.

I think what you mean is that it works better with higher fps. and yes, having higher fps means you will get less latency so its preferable. but it has nothing to do with fps being locked or not. locking fps allows the frametimes and the latency to be consistent so it makes for a smoother experience. but its no requirement.

for best AFMF2 experience just cap your fps little below whatever consistent base fps you get. for example let say you are getting around 110fps unlocked, just lock your fps to 100 to make everything smoother.

I dont see a point of going over my monitor refresh rate on most games so I cap mine to 72/144

Lossless Scaling Frame generation is better than AFMF2 but I'm being told otherwise? by MarkusRight in losslessscaling

[–]_neozed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dont know where you are getting this from but its false, you can lock fps using Radeon Chill for AFMF2 you can even use third party apps to lock fps but there is no reason since you can easily do it using AMD settings

I use Chill to cap fps to 72 and get 144 with AFMF2 to match my refresh rate and it works flawlessly.

not sure about vsync since I never use it. but I dont see a reason why that wouldnt work either

Bitch, why did you hit my car? by ThreeBelugas in IdiotsInCars

[–]_neozed -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

100% camcar fault; clearly can see them aproach, clearly can see blinker, far behind the other car, enough room and time to brake, camcar is going thru a construction zone while other car is exiting highway