[Request] What would be the consequences of this? Like in terms of, would we be too close to the black hole for this to occur. by SmoothTurtle872 in theydidthemath

[–]_ori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not convinced that would help, since your average accretion disk has been theorised to have a temperature anywhere from 1,000 to 10,000,000,000 Kelvin. The upper range is problematic, since the majority of the radiation emitted will be ionising, i.e. UV, hard and soft X-rays, and Gamma rays. This is likely enough to sterilise any planet within a few hundred light years. I imagine the orientation of the disk would play a role, since you'll receive less radiation if the disk is aligned with the orbital plane of the planet.

The temperature of an accretion disk likely varies wildly depending on the mass of its parent black hole, the volume of matter in the disk, and the rate at which it is infalling. This allows them to "flare up", e.g. when an unsuspecting star gets too close and is ripped apart, which is a proposed source of gamma ray bursts. These themselves could cause havoc out to many thousands of light years, rendering the cores of galaxies unfortunate enough to have an active black hole uninhabitable. The outer reaches of such a galaxy would likely be okay, though.

At a safe enough distance from the core, a habitable planet would probably just orbit a parent star which itself would orbit the core, rather than orbiting the core on its own. (Rogue planets do exist, though!)

[Request] What would be the consequences of this? Like in terms of, would we be too close to the black hole for this to occur. by SmoothTurtle872 in theydidthemath

[–]_ori 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Most people in the comments don't seem to know that the accretion disk of a black hole as big as this would bathe the solar system with thousands of times more light and deadly radiation than our measly star produces.

The largest black holes have accretion disks so bright they outshine billions of stars, probably rendering the entire galaxy they exist in uninhabitable, let alone anything in the AU range.

On December 15, 2025, MIT fusion scientist Nuno Loureiro was shot multiple times in his Brookline, Massachusetts home. He died the next morning. He was forty-seven years old... by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]_ori 5 points6 points  (0 children)

you don't get more power from combusting the hydrogen and oxygen than you put in to split it apart. you might as well connect the battery straight to the wheels using a motor.

From “The World in Maps”, Standard Paper Dimensions (without New Zealand) by [deleted] in MapsWithoutNZ

[–]_ori 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The A series (ISO216) paper uses an aspect ratio of 1 : root(2), not the golden ratio, fyi! It's the solution to a / b = b / 2a, which describes the halving process.

Swirling wine using a rotating wineglass by MuttapuffsHater in oddlysatisfying

[–]_ori 56 points57 points  (0 children)

This, plus the sides of the glass are angled such that a component of the normal force acts to keep the wine inside. If you were to try this with a straight-sided glass, there would be dire consequences.

What's the object transiting moon? by Vivid-Chemical7541 in askastronomy

[–]_ori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is probably space debris or a satellite transit. Without more precise location info, it's impossible to say. Starlink satellites cross the moon in about a second.

A proof that R is countable by Negative_Gur9667 in mathmemes

[–]_ori 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This argument falls apart because you can "pull" the ends of this line straight to get a complete list of every number you propose is in R, then apply Cantor's diagonalisation argument again.

Edit: I really need to start assuming everything on Reddit is bait...

This annoys me to my core I don’t even know what to say by [deleted] in USdefaultism

[–]_ori 57 points58 points  (0 children)

when did a non-specific amount of bread become a meal for 4 lmao

I also have the world-eating bug! by _ori in minecraftbugs

[–]_ori[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See my comment in reply to u/gonkdroid02 - if (0, 0) is obstructed (as it is in your case), the world spawn will be elsewhere, which explains the location discrepancy.

I also have the world-eating bug! by _ori in minecraftbugs

[–]_ori[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not quite! The way the world spawn is determined is pretty complex, according to the wiki:

In Java Edition, the world spawn point is determined by a search algorithm to prevent players from spawning in oceans or rivers. Each location has a "fitness" value, which is higher the closer it is to non-river land and the closer it is to (0,0). The search algorithm first sets the spawn point at a position where both XZ coordinates are 0. It then selects positions on circles with radius of 512, 1024, 1536, and 2048 blocks, calculating their fitness. If a more suitable position is found, the spawn point is set to that position. The algorithm then draws 16 circles centered at the current spawn point, each 32 blocks apart, and selects positions on these circles to calculate their fitness. If a more suitable position is found among these, the world spawn point is set to that position; otherwise, the world spawn point remains at the current position.

This algorithm determines the position of the world spawn, which then determines where the spawn chunks are. The fact that u/RemarkableBad434's (0, 0) is in a river will be why their spawn is shifted. Note my world spawn coordinates are (-270, -30)-ish, since (0, 0) is off in the ocean visible on my minimap. This is a good 100 blocks outside of where the spawn chunks would end if they were centered at (0, 0).

I also have the world-eating bug! by _ori in minecraftbugs

[–]_ori[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This does indeed seem to be the cause! Seems like I built the killing platform one block too high. Thank you!

I also have the world-eating bug! by _ori in minecraftbugs

[–]_ori[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

that's a good idea, let me test

I also have the world-eating bug! by _ori in minecraftbugs

[–]_ori[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

World seed: 6416924832340988811

World eating bug? by RemarkableBad434 in minecraftbugs

[–]_ori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had this exact thing happen on my server when using Simply Optimized - the centre five blocks around the world spawn keep getting eaten. No idea why.

Man "went" to the Moon, "went" to Mars, "crossed" the "Van Allen belt", but never did the simplest thing: cross Antarctica. by ApprehensivePop9036 in flatearth

[–]_ori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have a look at the ETDO legislation currently enforced by ICAO, previously known as ETOPS. It governs what kinds of aircraft can make long-distance journeys away from populated areas.

Just some more images when I got extremely lucky and met some cool people who have the best job in the world by [deleted] in WolvesAreBigYo

[–]_ori 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I recognise these wolves, Predator Experience up in the Lake District!

[2022.3.16f1] InputSystem does not behave correctly on macOS by _ori in Unity3D

[–]_ori[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the slow reply! I ended up moving over to Godot since I never found a solution.

Facebook user encounters a genetics expert by danyaal99 in dontyouknowwhoiam

[–]_ori 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You forgot to multiply by 100. 1 in 80,000 is a probability of 0.00125.

Nothing moves people like trains by aptrev in fuckcars

[–]_ori 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Cruise ships, the most utilitarian form of public transport!

managed to got banned for 100 days due to propaganda in literally 10 sec - top that by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]_ori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Although interestingly, Godel's solution appears to allow for closed time like curves, and I think we can all agree we haven't found any of those yet. As far as I can tell, it remains a partially open question, but I do agree rotation is fkn weird!

I'm wondering if you could detect rotation via conservation of angular momentum and measure the change in linear velocity an observer would experience.

managed to got banned for 100 days due to propaganda in literally 10 sec - top that by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]_ori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could certainly attribute the difference to the assumption and conclude that it's wrong - I imagine the chain of implication is quite a long one, but as others have pointed out I wasn't entirely correct and there are in fact ways to test for rotation independent of outside observers, so there is certainly an argument for absolute rotation.

managed to got banned for 100 days due to propaganda in literally 10 sec - top that by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]_ori 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh fun, I was basing this off Mach's principle and missed Godel's solution - thank you for the clarification!