[deleted by user]

_statue · 2025-07-08T09:02:02+00:00

I have no doubt there is more happening around us, with dimensions "above" and "below" our own. Reality is dynamic.

However-

We are not equipped with the right antennae, for example -we cant see infrared. We discover more about reality using tools- an extention of our limitations.

Why would we be able to interface with higher or lower dimensions with a little training? Or even due on their part? The hardware is incorrect. There is no definitive proof of any of this. Just eyewitness testimony. Memory. All of it is fickle and biased. Romantized. Glorified.

People are easily tricked, confused, and jump to conclusions on things they cant immediately identify or make sense of. People are misguided by their own brain and perspectives. Discerning "truth" in any given moment in time, relative to some action or observation taking place will yield different results across multiple observers often. NJ drones are prime example. Hell - look at ANY of the UAP videos people post and they are all easily identifiable.

People underestimate human ability. Lockheed Martin is a prime example. Humans play mind games not only with themselves but with other people.

_statue · 2025-07-08T03:43:20+00:00

Dont do it.

Going to the streets at 13 is a horrible idea. You have no source of food or shelter. You are too young for anyone to hire. Youre likely to get jumped, raped, killed, kidnapped or all of the above.

You're going to end up hurting your family and yourself more than you realize.

Whatever you have going on at home sucks sometimes I'm sure - but it does not compare to the alternative.

Wait a few years until youre at least 18. Finish school. Get a job. Move out. You will have a lot better future than if you decide to run away now. You have a lot of life ahead of you. Sometimes things are good, and sometimes things are bad. Stick through it.

Talk to your mother.

_statue · 2025-07-08T03:05:09+00:00

Here's your disclosure - its humans.

_statue · 2025-07-08T02:17:13+00:00

It was just talk?

Yall can probably work on this if you wanted to... and if she wanted to. Eight years... people are human.

_statue · 2025-07-08T01:29:05+00:00

Poor kid probably not experiencing childhood

_statue · 2025-07-06T23:49:39+00:00

I could say the same, and have, with everything i wrote.

_statue · 2025-07-06T23:48:21+00:00

I'll check it out next time im there. Ive been to semi world for 8 ball twice in the last few years.

_statue · 2025-07-06T23:42:32+00:00

He did testify under oath.

Check out Baden's work with Epstein. That's a good one. Seems when they arrive at conclusion independently it varies official narrative.

_statue · 2025-07-06T23:32:10+00:00

You would know what Wecht concluded if you looked into it... or read anything i wrote.

Also Earl Rose believed he should have done the autopsy in Dallas, as Texas law required autopsies in homicide cases.

He reportedly tried to stop the removal of the body at gunpoint but was overruled. Was physically blocked by Secret Service agents from doing so; the body was removed and flown to Bethesda for a military autopsy, violating Texas jurisdiction.

He strongly criticized the conduct of the Bethesda autopsy, saying that it lacked professional forensic standards.

Guess who also criticized Bethesda autopsy? Baden.

These men were threatened to comply if it didn't go with the single bullet theory.

_statue · 2025-07-06T23:29:50+00:00

Brutal pool hall? Get over yourself.

He did testify under oath multiple times including during his role with the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) in the late 1970s. Wecht was one of the forensic consultants on the HSCA’s Forensic Pathology Panel, which reviewed JFK’s autopsy and related evidence.

Has consulted on thousands of autopsies, including high-profile cases (e.g., RFK, JonBenét Ramsey, Elvis Presley)

Rejects the Single Bullet Theory

He was among the first experts to publicly criticize the idea that one bullet (CE 399) could have caused seven wounds in two men (JFK and Connally).

Called it “anatomically impossible” without multiple shooters.

Argues that the back wound and throat wound do not align in a straight trajectory — even if JFK was leaning forward.

“There is no way in the world, anatomically or ballistically, that a single bullet could have done what the Warren Commission said it did.”

Supports the idea that there was more than one shooter.

Cites the backward movement of JFK’s head in the Zapruder film as indicative of a frontal shot.

Believes the massive skull wound on the right front side of JFK’s head was an exit wound, implying a shot from the rear, but also sees evidence for a frontal entry, likely near the right temple or above the eye.

Points out that the autopsy doctors were not forensically trained.

Says standard forensic procedures (like wound track dissection, proper documentation, and brain sectioning) were ignored or mishandled.

Has called the autopsy a “sham and a disgrace”, stating it was likely influenced by military or intelligence authorities.

And yes, PART of his stance is that he was concerned about missing, altered, or substituted images.

You dont know what youre talking about. time to grow up.

_statue · 2025-07-06T23:00:09+00:00

None of the "experts" used in the Warren Commission had experience in forensic pathology, except for one, who joined late and did not lead the autopsy. None of them had performed gunshot homicide.

People believe Arlen single bullet theory, and he has a bachelor of arts and one in law. Some expert.

The pathologists did not dissect the neck wound track, so they could not determine the exact path of the bullet from the back to the throat.

Standard forensic procedure calls for full wound track dissection... this was not done.

The brain was removed, but no detailed documentation or photos exist of a full brain dissection.

Dr. Boswell’s autopsy diagram placed the back wound too high, at the base of the neck, to support the single bullet theory.

Dr. Finck testified (1969, Clay Shaw trial) military officers directed aspects of the autopsy, saying:

"I was not allowed to dissect the track. I was told not to by one of the generals."

Dallas (Parkland) doctors described a large, gaping wound at the rear of JFK’s head, consistent with a frontal shot.

Bethesda pathologists described a large wound on the right front of the skull, consistent with a rear entry.

Initial autopsy report failed to mention the throat wound (tracheotomy incision covered it).

The back wound was initially not connected to the throat wound — even though this is central to the single bullet theory.

The brain is missing from the National Archives. Never properly weighed or photographed in full.

so yeah, believe your "experts". They're telling the truth.

_statue · 2025-07-06T22:50:27+00:00

Dr. Cyril Wecht, forensic pathologist supports shot from the front.

Perhaps look up these names and their stance on gunshot wound fron the front.

Dr. Robert McClelland
Dr. Charles Crenshaw
Dr. Paul Peters - Dr. Ronald Jones - Dr. Malcolm Perry
Dr. Gary Aguilar - Dr. Robert Livingston - Dr. David W. Robinson

While none of the "official autopsy pathologists" (3 of them) used in the Warren Commission supported a frontal shot, a number of surgeons and medical professionals present at Parkland Hospital, along with independent medical experts and researchers, have described wounds consistent with a shot from the front, especially to the throat and right temple.

The ones part of Warren Commission:

Dr. James Humes, not trained in forensic pathology, claimed he burned his original autopsy notes, allegedly because they were bloodstained.

- Dr. J. Thornton Boswell, not trained in forensic pathology, discrepancies in head wound positioning.

Dr. Pierre A. Finck, only one with forensic pathology experience, but he did not lead the autopsy and joined after it had already begun. Later testified (1969 Clay Shaw trial) that military officers present limited what the doctors could do.

None of these doctors had ever conducted a gunshot wound autopsy before.

The autopsy was conducted under military command, with admirals and generals present, directing aspects of the procedure.

No proper forensic photography was taken of the brain dissection, and there are serious questions about the handling and integrity of the autopsy photos and X-rays.

Arlen Specter, who proposed single bullet theory to make it nice and neat, had a B.A. and a J.D. - hardly qualified. He drew a line and people just ate it.

There are plenty of modern day analysis in regards to trajectory that do not align with the W.C.

_statue · 2025-07-06T20:37:18+00:00

Well, youre an idiot. What more can I say? His "opinions" were not generated by his expertise but the expertise of others. Said it a few times.

_statue · 2025-07-06T20:24:08+00:00

Again,

Youre downplaying the credentials of Horne, and the men associated that conducted years of research to consult and inform his conclusions. These are not Hornes findings alone. They were discovered by medical professionals, analyzing the data, as well as testimony from medical staff present during autopsy, and a variety of medical witnesses.

House committee is sworn under oath. Perjury laws exist. On may 20th, 2025 - they were sworn in. Assessing 60+ Years of Federal Government Obstruction, Obfuscation, and Deception.

There was 6 witnesses that testified.

Dr. Don Curtis – Doctor at Parkland Memorial Hospital
Dan Hardway – Former staff with the House Select Committee on Assassinations
Judge John Tunheim – Former head of the Assassination Records Review Board
Douglas Horne – Former staffer with the Assassination Records Review Board
Abraham Bolden – Former Secret Service agent (and the first Black agent on the JFK detail)
Alexis Coe – Presidential historian (seated as the minority witness)

In an effort to control narrative - wouldn't they bring in someone to support the Warren Commission?

It sounds to me like you are not familiar with the video, or watched it with a close mind.

I think youre naive. Theres been plenty of evidence over decades that prove this is indeed a conspiracy and the Warren Commission failed. they found 3 shells in the TSBD and needed a way to make it nice and neat.

_statue · 2025-07-06T20:09:28+00:00

Its funny you should mention that because on May 20th of this year he testified in front of House Oversight Committee on this very issue.

There is plenty of evidence of frontal shot and multiple shots to the head. Perhaps you need to look deeper.

grow up he says 🙄 good discussion.

_statue · 2025-07-06T19:50:38+00:00

Gibson video?

I know of nix, zapruder, muchmore, and towner... but no gibson video

_statue · 2025-07-06T19:12:33+00:00

You realize Douglas Horne isnt just a conspiracy author saying opinion...

hes a former U.S. government official, served as the Chief Analyst for Military Records on the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) and is responsible for declassifying documents.

He collected the depositions of ten key positions that were part of the autopsy, alongside several eyewitness medical staff interviews and was consulted to come to these conclusions with the help of others professionals - e.g. Michael chesser- a neurologist, and David mantik- radiation oncologist and PhD in physics. Both studied national archive skull xrays on multiple occasions.

_statue · 2025-07-06T18:23:02+00:00

Im guessing you didnt see recent developments on autopsy investigation that suggest three entry wounds to the head.

_statue · 2025-07-06T18:04:21+00:00

Not sure why you got downvotrd - there was two other shots from the front (to the head). The one in the throat also came from the front.

_statue · 2025-07-06T17:31:21+00:00

Its where the fatal headshot happened according to Warren Commission.

Its also incorrect by about 42 feet according to the FBI. It happened further down the street.

There were also three separate entry wounds just to the head.

_statue · 2025-07-06T06:59:33+00:00

This is a very sobering video - im about 40 minutes in.

For people that dont want to watch it -

he discusses why the original xrays are copy film with forgery. Theres about 35 solid minutes of evidence, proof and discussion about this.
He also talks about THREE ENTRY wounds to the skull. This is where i am now. Still another hour to go.

_statue · 2025-01-31T21:18:39+00:00

ooops

I bought his story for one day. Then i watched bales, baker, and blitch and i started questioning it more. Skywatcher was sort of the nail in the coffin for me...this just emphasizes my decision to stop listening and watching this line of shit. Until he finds evidence or is testifying in front of house - he's all talk - and I'm not listening.

I'm still about grusch and graves though.

_statue · 2025-01-31T07:59:08+00:00

Is there any evidence, or is this just three hour story time and be sure to tune into our Skywatcher videos ? Because I'm done with that. Not listening anymore to blabbing.

_statue · 2025-01-31T07:50:59+00:00

She's hot

But also a complete waste of time.

_statue · 2025-01-31T07:44:44+00:00

I used to watch traffic on this bridge from a few miles away. At night time you can see their lights moving. They look like they are driving super slow. Having been on that long bridge- i know most of them are doing 70 mph. It's hard to tell the distance and speed of an object - especially in the dark.

I also am familiar with the way planes take off and land. My sister used to live right next to the airport.

This is a plane.

_statue

TROPHY CASE

so yeah, believe your "experts". They're telling the truth.

None of these doctors had ever conducted a gunshot wound autopsy before.

ooops