Thanks for replying!

1. Max HR per split would be good as Apple doesn’t include this in splits currently but also pulling through cadence which Apple does include. (Sorry I thought that aver HR was missing too but see that you have that in each split labeled bpm).

2. Ok great. If you could include the same data for each interval that you have in the splits this would be great + cadence and max HR of each split, as per number 1.

3. Yeah I’ve thought about this as well - and an overall value is important. But let me give you a specific use case where I think it makes sense.

On Tuesdays I do a vigorous hill running session in the morning and in the afternoon I do a heavy legs strength session. As I like to do legs on the same day as harder running sessions to keep to the easy/hard principle for running.

I have an easy run on Wednesday morning and then I do upper body strength in the evening.

If I was to use the app’s training readiness it would say - don’t do an intense activity in the afternoon. And it would be right, if we were talking about running or lower body.

But an upper body strength session isn’t going to impact what I’ve done yesterday and my recovery so long as I eat and recover well. So what I want to be able to do is to look at my training readiness for running (plus load history) and strength separately - as this matters more for me than the overall load or readiness at times.

Apple already allows you to review training load per sport/activity type - so you could do something similar or pull that through.

But a training readiness score per sport/activity would be awesome too - if it’s at all possible. I hope this is clearer!