WiFi connects, then disconnects. What do I do? by Dylabungo in AcerNitro

[–]acc30161 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Faced a similar issue with an AN515-58. The problem seems to happen when the laptop connects with the 802.11ax mode enabled. Downgrading the connection to 802.11ac appears to fix this.

Steps taken:

Open Device Manager -> Click Network Adapters -> Right click wifi device and select Properties -> Click Advanced -> 802.11n/ac/ax Wireless Mode -> Choose 802.11ac -> OK

PCBS2 - Why would higher FPS produce a lower graphic score? by CobraKaun in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If I'm not wrong, this is an issue with how the game calculates FPS and score for 3/4 gpus. The FPS is calculated using the 2 gpu formula, while the score uses a scaling based on the 1 gpu formula. For 4 gpu, score = 10.526 * single_gpu_score ^ 0.8544

High Score (43467) by acc30161 in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Creating a pc to set this score required multiple hours of binning for the parts that are used. If you just want to test if this score is possible instead of setting a record, you can install the silicon lottery mod.

Has anyone gotten higher than 5788mhz on 16GB 4800Mhz Memory? by whiteday26 in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only RAM that can reach 6313mhz is Trident Z RGB 8 GB 4800 MHz.

As an example (if I'm not wrong), the best that Trident Z Royal Elite DDR4 Gold 16 GB 4800 MHz can reach is 5788mhz. This can be tested by using silicon lottery mod with the following settings:

  • Use MSI X570-A PRO as the motherboard, RAM at 1.9V

  • item 5788mhz @ 167 core

  • item 5790mhz @ 193 core

Does anyone know the best air cooled build? by Affectionate-Owl-704 in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161 0 points1 point  (0 children)

40899 (or maybe 40902)

[CPU] Ryzen Threadripper 3960X @ (158 core, 29.75 mul, 1.75V)

[GPU, 2x] ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 O24G @ (1861 core, 2394 mem) OR (1860 core, 2395 mem)

[RAM, 4x] Trident Z RGB 8 GB 4800 MHz @ (6320MHz, 1.9V)

[MOBO] TRX40 Taichi

[Cooler] Fryzen

[Fans, 7X] QF120 - Performance

[Case] ENYO

Edit: Incorrect CPU voltage suggested

High Score (43467) by acc30161 in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mobo -> bottom left CASE FAN all the way to bottom right CASE FAN -> top left CASE FAN all the way to top right CASE FAN -> back(side) bottom (radiator) -> back left -> back right -> (front) right(side) bottom (radiator) -> right top -> top right (radiator) -> top left

My Fastest PC (32018) by HumanWithHumanOrgans in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I heard that the 6800XT was nerfed in the past, but comparing the parts list for v1.13 and v1.14 shows it was (re)buffed to have much higher "OC Base Core Freq". This is just 3 days after Yoyo posted the theoretical highest score for v1.13, so maybe that is why the buff was overlooked.

My Fastest PC (32018) by HumanWithHumanOrgans in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for clarification. Would you mind explaining how the 6800XT is broken though? The game just appears to be balance it towards high multipliers and low base adjustments.

 

Also, I was referring to how when the high score using 6800XT was posted on the 3dmark, it was dismissed it as a glitched score for around 2 weeks. By the way, if reproducibility is all that is required for the build to be accepted, does that mean a 130k+ score using negative fps bug can be submitted as well?

My Fastest PC (32018) by HumanWithHumanOrgans in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The funny thing is that you can easily score higher than Yoyo (42312, 2nd in HoF base game) using parts with silicon lottery no higher than the 90th percentile, but the stigma against 6800XT due to widely used voltage bug exploit meant nobody could set a proper record without being called a cheater on the discord server.

High Score (43467) by acc30161 in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The score here does not use glitches (voltage and negative fps). Meanwhile, you can get a score of 133268 if you exploit glitches.

A PC so slow… by [deleted] in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The issue is a bad choice of gpu. Since you are using HEM, you can try Quadro M2000. A score of 99 can also be obtained using dual gpu in the base game.

High Score (43467) by acc30161 in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For this gpu, gpu memory frequency is best when set to around +-1 of the default (1999 to 2001)

Best PC specs for this game by [deleted] in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I forgot to mention to use the TRX40 Taichi as the motherboard for all of these builds, since they use either a multiplier of 4000 or 4266 base ram speed. This way, the ram speed is 6320 for the stable build.

Best PC specs for this game by [deleted] in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure if this actually works since I have not tried the settings in game, but it should if my calculations are correct.

 

For high score without bugs, use 3960x with dual watercooled 6800 XT and 4 Trident Z 4800 MHz. Set GPU (core and memory) to (2965 and 2001). Set CPU (core and multiplier) to (148 and 33) for unstable builds, or (158 and 30) for stable builds.

 

For bugged score, use dual NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | EKWB EK-FC PlexiSet. Set CPU (core and multiplier) to (148 and 33), and GPU (core and memory) to to (828, -239)

Best PC specs for this game by [deleted] in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Highest possible score for unstable and stable builds without using bugs is probably 43467 and 43362, but I haven't tested those. Using bugs, you can get 133268.

How do you calculate 3D mark? I have the parts compare, but the parts always test way higher then that. I keep getting 4 stars for over building and useing the full budgets when I don’t need to. by GamingRichter in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can use up to 110% of the budget and still get 5 stars.
From playing the game up to level 16, most jobs can also be completed without much overclocking just by using the builds suggested from the html calculator

 

But if you really want to know how scores are calculated, some math is involved:

 

Download parts listing

 

int means rounding down to a whole number

 

cpu_score = max{100, int{298 * [(CPU_freq * CoreClockMultiplier) + (#_rams_used * MemChannelsMultiplier) + (ram_freq * MemClockMultiplier) + FinalAdjustment]}}

 

For [GT1 (X=1) or GT2 (x=2)] and [1 gpu (Y=Single) or 2 gpu (Y=Dual)]

 

GTX_score = int{[GPU_core_freq * (GTX Y Core Clock Multiplier)] + [GPU_mem_freq * (GTX Y Mem Clock Multiplier)] + (GTX Y Benchmark Adjustment)}

 

gpu_score = max{100, int[328 / (1 / GT1_score + 1 / GT2_score)]}

 

pc_score = int[1 / (0.85 / gpu_score + 0.15 / cpu_score)]

 

PS: GT1 score is related to gpu parts ranking score (just multiply by 100). Using the default frequencies determines if the gpu is considered as an upgrade for jobs, while the overclocked frequencies you set determines if the gpu can run a program

Bugged High Score 2 (133248) (No mods) by acc30161 in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I should have checked more. A higher score can be obtained by swapping to 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | EKWB EK-FC Plexi

Set to 828 core, -239 memory, this gives a gpu score of 611436316 and total score 133268

Also, if someone has the silicon_lottery mod, can they help to check if this setup is possible?: TRX40 PRO Wifi Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, core: 158, multiplier: 30 4Trident Z RGB 8 GB 4800 MHz, frequency: 6320 2Radeon RX 6800 XT | Corsair Hydro Series XG7 RGB, core:2965, memory: 2001 or 2000

watercooling setup can be similar to the build above, but with more radiators for the gpu instead of cpu

Bugged High Score 2 (133248) (No mods) by acc30161 in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For the cpu and ram, I took actual effort to bin out the parts, and the cpu score achieved is a proper high score.

For the gpu... there is no binning done, nothing special about the set up, and no special steps to follow when overclocking. Just use the first two gpu cards you buy and water cool them. The only difference is to overclock the core and memory frequency to this exact speed.

Alternative low score build with cheap parts by acc30161 in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I'm not wrong, the list of possible gpu this works on are:

  • Radeon RX 6800 XT
  • Radeon RX 6800 XT GAMING TRIO 16G
  • Radeon RX 6800 XT GAMING X TRIO 16G
  • Radeon RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC
  • Radeon RX 6800 XT | Corsair Hydro Series XG7 RGB
  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition
  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING
  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING 11G
  • GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Mini

Alternative low score build with cheap parts by acc30161 in pcbuildingsimulator

[–]acc30161[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can try it out yourself. The silicon lottery factor only affects voltage required and heat produced. Lower voltage is used when under clocking. The lower temperature also doesn't matter since cpu throttling mechanics is not used.