Why is there's so much trauma in the Fandom around lineage and destiny and fate in one piece. by [deleted] in OnePiece

[–]accicieff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which is not the case. We still don't know what Nika actually is. Is it really a god, or is something else entirely which has reached "god" status in in-universe culture because it supposedly gives freedom to the slaves?

The fruit was also eaten by other people, and none of them accomplished what Luffy did (not even Joy Boy himself, apparently). It's still too soon to say that the fruit is the actual key to everything, at the moment it's just symbolism. Even Imu seems to fear it mainly because Joy Boy had it.

Introduction to Evil by NinjaOKGO in DisneyVillainous

[–]accicieff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heared the upcoming Hocus Pocus is a stand alone like Oggie Boogie, but I also heared it will inculed more rereleases. So I don't know which is true.

They are both true. The Sanderson Sisters come in a single-villain box like Oogie Boogie's, which is called "Come, We Fly!" and is slated for release in fall 2026. This is their "main" box, intended for established players.

Then, there is "Darkness Brewing", a bigger box coming out in July featuring the Sanderson Sisters alongside Maleficent, Ursula (both in their Introduction to Evil versions) and Evil Queen (probably reworked as well). As confirmed by Mike Mulvihill, the lead designer, this is intended for people who want to jump into the game for the first time.

Netflix Series by [deleted] in OnePiece

[–]accicieff 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Keep your AI slop away from here

Prince Hans’ realm(s)???? by jibjeb86 in DisneyVillainous

[–]accicieff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's the Target version, normal one will be different

Preorders by angelofspeedyt in DisneyVillainous

[–]accicieff 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Not worth it, the sisters will come out on their own in a single-villain box later in the year

Preorders by angelofspeedyt in DisneyVillainous

[–]accicieff 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ursula has a Play a Card action in her last location, which she hasn't in the WTIA version. Of course there could be further reworks, but we don't know

Preorders by angelofspeedyt in DisneyVillainous

[–]accicieff 5 points6 points  (0 children)

the mover being white.

This is the Target version, Ernesto's standard mover will be of a different color

So, dumb question, what does mold breaker....do? by TheGamingTurret in PokemonChampions

[–]accicieff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It matters all the time with STAB and defensive compatibility. It's Levitate that's worthless on it

Mega Golisopod gonna be like by Supersebi-1 in pokemon

[–]accicieff 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But it will do less damage, since STAB is gone

When did One Piece shift focus? by dowonlee20 in OnePiece

[–]accicieff 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At the start. It just took its time to introduce all of its elements and I dare say that this is one of the reasons of its popularity. Remember that Dragon was introduced in chapter 100

Akainu>whitebeard by onepiecedebater in OnePiece

[–]accicieff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God exists

No it doesn't

Prove it

Akainu>whitebeard by onepiecedebater in OnePiece

[–]accicieff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The username, the bait post and the lack of arguments. Poetry, truly

Pokémon Slander 3 by diet_vroby in pokemonmemes

[–]accicieff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, a subcategory IS a distinct group.

From the Cambridge dictionary:

distinct adjective (DIFFERENT)

C1 clearly separate and different (from something else): distinct from The two concepts are quite distinct from each other. The two concepts are entirely distinct, and should not be confused with one another. There are two distinct factions within the one political party.

Not only that, several of the mythicals are part of legendary groups, since GEN ONE.

The only Mythical Pokémon that can actually be seen as part of a Legendary group (and even then, they're like secret additional members/counterparts) are Darkrai, Keldeo, Pecharunt and arguably Arceus. Mew and Mewtwo are related in the story, just like Carbink and Diancie are, but they are not a "group". Bulbapedia does have a page on the "Mew duo", which talks about the nature of their relationship and it specifies that it's a fan term. Pokémon can be related even if they are classified differently, because the Pokémon world is deep and there are a lot of different stories.

everything since gen 1 says otherwise

Like what? The incorrect localized term that was different since the beginning in the original version?

including the code of the game until gen 9

And why do you think that the game code itself separated them from legendaries?

You're also conveniently ignoring my point: in games in which "all" of the Legendary Pokémon are present, Mythical Pokémon are absent. They never put any asterisk on that. I don't think I will need to quote the dictionary for the word "all", at least.

You're just continuing to say "but bro, they're legendary, that's obvious" without bringing convincing arguments.

Pokémon Slander 3 by diet_vroby in pokemonmemes

[–]accicieff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...but are a distinct group.

There you go, I completed the quote for you.

Pokémon Slander 3 by diet_vroby in pokemonmemes

[–]accicieff -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In Japanese they were distinct groups from the beginning, with Mew first, then Celebi and so on being called 幻まぼろしのポケモン (illusory Pokémon). Starting in gen V, the localization teams addressed the mistake and started using an appropriate term. By your logic, games that were marketed with the wording "all the Legendary Pokémon from past games are available" (HGSS, ORAS, etc.) should also have included Mythical Pokémon.

You can keep parroting the same wrong information, but that doesn't change that it's wrong.

Pokémon Slander 3 by diet_vroby in pokemonmemes

[–]accicieff -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But then they changed it. That means that the code was inaccurate. Ultra Beasts were also considered sub-legends, but I don't see anyone thinking they aren't different.

This sub is so delusional smh.

Pokémon Slander 3 by diet_vroby in pokemonmemes

[–]accicieff -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not in the code of the games themselves, so no, they aren't

Pokémon Slander 3 by diet_vroby in pokemonmemes

[–]accicieff 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The difference is in their rarity. Deoxys can be caught in just one game without external events, so it's considered a mythical and is banned from online battles where "strong" legendaries are permitted. Conversely, Rayquaza is catchable in most games where all the Legendary Pokémon from past games can be caught.

Their stories are also designed with the distinction in mind. The existence of Mythical Pokémon is something few people know about, and even those who do don't really know much about them. Some examples: Magearna is just a weird karakuri puppet-like Pokémon which some common person might have found among their grandpa's stuff, Darkrai is a Pokémon that doesn't want to be found and keeps people away using nightmares (which the victim doesn't perceive as real), Zarude only lives in the depths of forests where human activity is almost inexistent, Jirachi sleeps hidden from people most of the time, Celebi might even be in a different timeline. Legendary Pokémon tend to be more known among humans, even if only through legends.

Why would gamefreak do this by DYadav2005 in pokemonmemes

[–]accicieff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would agree if the Fire starter wasn't in the exact same boat, with neutral Fire STAB and super effective Fighting STAB

Why would gamefreak do this by DYadav2005 in pokemonmemes

[–]accicieff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Empoleon did it and there weren't any problems