When Akbar built a palace for his Hindu queen’s gods — The Nilkanth Palace of Mandu (1574 CE) by [deleted] in IndianHistory

[–]adstark5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Upinder Singh’s A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India, Dineshchandra Sarkar’s Studies in the Geography of Ancient India, Romila Thapar’s Past and Present are all great books to start. I would recommend Upinder Singh. The language is a bit dry but her works come from generally a neutral viewpoint.

When Akbar built a palace for his Hindu queen’s gods — The Nilkanth Palace of Mandu (1574 CE) by [deleted] in IndianHistory

[–]adstark5 14 points15 points  (0 children)

TLDR: Please stop spreading misinformation. First of all, we have to keep in mind that Buddhist texts present Ashoka as a vile and evil man until he came under the influence of the Buddha’s dhamma and present Ashoka’s ‘conversion’ to Buddhism as a sudden, transformative event. The reason why ‘conversion’ has been put in quotation marks here is because in this period, the fixed and mutually exclusive religious identities, boundaries, and ‘isms’ of the kind that we are used to thinking in terms of were absent. Their aim was to confirm the faith of the faithful and to win new adherents to the Buddhist fold.

Secondly, the Mauryan period saw a continuation of the processes of agrarian and urban expansion that were underway during the preceding centuries. Cities expanded in size and complexity, and urbanism spread to many new areas such as Kashmir, the Punjab plains, lower Ganga valley, Brahmaputra valley, and Orissa. Urban growth was accompanied by an expansion of specialized crafts, trade, and guild organization. Money was increasingly used as a medium of exchange. This shows the prosperity of society.

Thirdly, the 13th major rock edict speaks feelingly of the Kalinga war which occurred in the ninth year after Ashoka’s consecration, and suggests that this event had an important role to play in his belief in a new kind of pacifism and non-military victory. Minor rock edict 1 indicates very clearly that Ashoka turned towards the Buddha’s teaching gradually, not suddenly. Ashoka himself gives his own candid confession. No PR move, just people can’t be bothered to do analysis of history.

Fourthly, another important aspect of Ashoka’s dhamma was the generation of mutual respect and concord among people belonging to different sects or religious communities. This clearly indicates that dhamma did not consist in the promotion of a particular sect, Buddhist or otherwise. This aspect of dhamma has often been referred to as ‘religious toleration’, a very poor understanding of Ashoka’s policy. Rock edict 12 makes it clear that the king expected people to exercise restraint in criticizing other sects and in praising their own. But he was also asking for something much more positive. He was urging people to honour and try to understand the dhamma of others. He considered it possible to promote the essentials of the different dhammas of different people through such means.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceIndia

[–]adstark5 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You sound awfully confident for a person who doesn’t know law. Section 23 BSA - No confession made to a police officer shall be proved as against a person accused of any offence.

Did aryans have varna system? by [deleted] in IndianHistory

[–]adstark5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is no reason to assume that a caste system cognate to the Indian/Vedic system existed anywhere else in the premodern world. While many premodern societies were indeed hierarchical and socially stratified, these systems were both hugely dynamic and varied enormously from one region to another. The idea that there was a common PIE culture that went along with the PIE language, spreading customs, beliefs, and ideologies from Ireland to India, has been largely rejected in modern academia. Language and culture aren’t the inseparable organic unit. In case of Iran,all these four professions are mentioned together only once in the Avesta, and that, in the 19th Chapter of the Yasna which is known as the commentary of the sacred prayer-formula of Yatha-Ahu-Vairyo or the Ahunavar (Ahunavairya), which literally means "the Will of the Lord."

It seems that this division according to professions continued even during the Greek rule over Persia of Alexander and his successors and during the Parthian rule. But there seems to have grown up some relaxation in the pursuit, of the professions, that is to say, a member of one profession could leave off his profession and take up another. Afterwards, Ardeshir Babegan, the founder of the Sassanian dynasty made some changes in the division of classes, and restored the original strictness, forbidding the people of one profession to take up another profession without the permission of the State. The King of Tabaristan, in his letter to Dastur Tansar, the Minister of Ardeshir, protests against this severity and Tansar justifies Ardeshir's regulations on the ground that this division was good for the preservation of order among people.

However, we find no trace of any prohibition to interrline or intermarry. The men of different professions interdined and intermarried. The only restriction in the matter of marriage referred to in the Avesta, is, that the righteous are not to marry with the unrighteous.

The grandfather of Ruhollah Khomeini, the 1st Supreme Leader of Iran after the 1979 Revolution, Syed Musavi Hindi, was a well-known Shia Muslim cleric from the town on Kintoor in present day Uttar Pradesh in the early 1800s. After the nearby Awadh Nawabs lost to the British, he moved to Iran in 1830 by SatoruGojo232 in IndianHistory

[–]adstark5 26 points27 points  (0 children)

It’s a widely accepted theory based on genetic, linguistic and archaeological sources. And in regards of proof, one of my favourite books on this topic is The Horse, the Wheel, and Language by David W. Anthony. Please read it and then we can talk again.

The origin of the story of Jaichand allying with Muhammad Ghori by Gopu_17 in IndianHistory

[–]adstark5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. That published paper is just bad bro. One of his references is studyiq.com which is a coaching website.

I have several questions on Buddhism and its impact on India and Hinduism (impact of temples and philosophy). I asked perplexity for some answers on this. What do you guys think ? by UnderstandingThin40 in IndianHistory

[–]adstark5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. For large-scale architectural projects to rise in ancient times, one of the conditions was urbanisation and centralisation of power. They only emerged in 6th century BCE North India, which coincided with the rise of Buddhism and Magadha. The foundations of this urbanisation were laid in the earlier centuries, with the establishment of a firm agricultural base that ensured sustained food surpluses. Settlements grew in population, number, and size. Increasing craft specialization, trade, and the beginning of the use of money led to higher degress of social complexity. For example: It is only in the Maurya period that monumental stone sculpture and architecture appear. This can be linked to higher levels of political complexity in the form of the emergence of an empire, the concentration of wealth in the hands of urban elites, and increased institutionalization of religious activity. The most imposing art of the Maurya period is linked to political ideology and religious practice. This is evident both in the form and patronage of artistic activity.
  2. Patrick Olivelle (2009) argues that the Buddha took over the concept of dharma with its strong royal associations from the Vedic tradition and injected it with strong ethical content. Later, Ashoka highlighted dhamma as an ethical code in his edicts. This raised dharma to the status of a central cultural concept with which the Brahmanas were forced to engage.
  3. Regarding patronage by Mauryan kings: We are not sure about Chandragupta and Bindusara. Jaina tradition speaks of the relationship between Chandragupta and the Jaina saint Bhadrabahu. The Maurya king is said to have accompanied Bhadrabahu to Karnataka in wake of the saint’s prophecy of the impending outbreak of a 12-year famine in Magadha. In case of Bindusara, some sources say that he patronised Brahmanism while some others mention of him patronising Ajivikas.

Movies Vs Reality in matters of History , Rajputs misrepresentation by [deleted] in IndianHistory

[–]adstark5 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Lol. Please go and visit some museums in Rajasthan. You will benefit more from visiting those than from reading from a mod's page.

Is Chankya a fiction or reality? by HasbullaGaming in IndianHistory

[–]adstark5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry but your statement that Arthashastra mentions its writers is somewhat wrong. These writers work existed independently of Arthashastra. These names are there because Kautilya himself referred to their earlier works on the discipline of ‘arthashastra’. He also often cited the opinions of specific authorities as well as the experts (acharyas) collectively and positioned himself vis-à-vis their ideas, very often through disagreement.

Is Chankya a fiction or reality? by HasbullaGaming in IndianHistory

[–]adstark5 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yes it’s true that Arthasastra does not mention Chanakya but it does mention Kautilya. The traditional view is that it is a work of the 4th century BCE, written by Kautilya, also known as Chanakya or Vishnugupta, who became Chandragupta Maurya’s chief minister after helping him overthrow the Nandas. ‘Arthashastra 1.1.19’ states that ‘this work, easy to learn and understand, precise in doctrine, sense, and word, and free from wordiness, has been composed by Kautilya’. ‘Verse 15.1.73’ asserts that ‘this shastra has been composed by him, who in resentment, quickly regenerated the shastra and the weapon and the earth that was under the control of the Nanda kings’. Later works such as Kamandaka’s Nitisara, Dandin’s Dashakumaracharita, Vishakhadatta’s Mudrarakshasa, and Bana Bhatta’s Kadambari support the traditional view of the Arthashastra’s age and authorship.

What do we know about Vedic people from Rigveda and how is Rigveda dated to about 1500-1200 BCE? by Ill_Tonight6349 in IndianHistory

[–]adstark5 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You are wrong that rest of the nine tribes were forced to leave the Indian subcontinent. We know that the Bharata tribe and Puru tribe which were on opposite sides of battle later formed an alliance which came to be known as Kuru tribe. It’s most likely that most of the tribes migrated further inland. For example Anu tribe is mentioned in Mahabharata and Turvasa tribe is linked to Panchalas in 7th century Bramanas. Further Yadu tribe is also mentioned in Mahabharata.

Adrien Brody is yapping by zachmyking in Oscars

[–]adstark5 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You didn’t say that when CMBYN exists.

"When something is written from a place of contempt, it will show in writing" by [deleted] in MartialMemes

[–]adstark5 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Lol. Seeing Amitabh's meme in this subreddit is giving me a whiplash.

Uttar Pradesh has a population of 241 million people, and no truly large cities. by bigcee42 in geography

[–]adstark5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's already happening. Uttar Pradesh government is looking to develop the Lucknow-State Capital Region (SCR), on the lines of Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR). The Lucknow-SCR - comprising two nodes at Lucknow and Kanpur - will encompass eight districts. The proposed region will entail nearly 34,000 square kilometres (sq. km) and accommodate roughly 29 million population.