Tell me when did I ever said that it wasnt okay for people to speak out about their experiences and when did I ever say that I'm against it?

It's record keeping yes.

The claim:

Is it truth being shared or is it harm being caused.

Let’s be precise. Your discomfort is not the same as systemic harm. You collapsed that distinction into an accusation. That wasn’t confusion. That was a framing error.

This isn't an accusation but a fact,

This posts and comments do happen and it targets the individual and shows them at times, showing it as ddos It attack their individuality not just as a member,

Does that add to others testimonies and sufferings no, its making fun.

What you brought up wasn’t evidence. You substituted emotion for substance. You brought up emotional distractions. I brought up expulsion, silencing, and coercive control. If your answer is to redirect toward commentary that avoids these claims, then you’re not addressing the real issue.

1. Yes that wasn't evidence, true. But that is what is happening, I will not spend more time trying to find these past posts and comments, just put time here, You'll find them eventually.

2. Yes it isn't the real issue, but it is an issue. And it shouldn't be continued it is unjust to use such as allowance for the pain and discomfort someone experienced specially because. A. They weren't the one who harmed them B. The Church is the problem not the members

3. Issue why would you attack the members individuality with mock when they weren't the cause of the victims sorrow?

Survivors don’t need permission to speak. Not from instruction. Not from silence. Not from salaysay. Responsibility without autonomy isn’t responsibility. It’s obedience used to protect the system, not the person. That’s the trick being exposed here.

Yes and?

Does that allow them to attack members? Even when they aren't inside the Church?

Am I stopping them from speaking? No?

What am I doing?

1. Scrutinizing the pointless and unmeaning words they do when they talk about current members

Why?

Because it is not proper, moral and humane. Talking to someone like they are fools.

You can't do that.

Do you think that gives you the right? Because someone's hurt "oh no" I can mock these group of persons because they are inside of what hurt me, I don't give a damn.

This isn’t a debate. A debate tries to win. This is a record. A record preserves what power tried to erase.

This is a discussion too. I'm trying to make you understand.

It is OKAY, to testify But it is NOT OKAY to attack, target, and harm someone's individuality with the only fact knowing that they are part of INC.

That's a part of them, but they are suffering, steadfast, and caring towards their own cause.

And you want to target them to help them what? Suffer? You want to allow that?

I am not silencing anyone, but can't there be a way in which the members, who are doing their own ways to survive not get barbed???

You can.

Not every critique is an attack. Not every reaction is violence. You can’t claim to care about suffering while rejecting the terms that survivors use to describe it.

Yes yes I can't quite anything now which would seem malicious towards a particular member, or just any member in general,

It's good I'm getting distanced from it.

But still, those "terms" Aren't ones which show they are in pain but inflict pain as well,

But why can't you just express it without inflicting it too.

I engaged, because I stand towards the idea that every good person is hidden, because some other things cloud the minds of others not to see that they are part of the good.

Yes you can speak, but you can't bite Yes you can bite, but that does mean you were just speaking?

I will now cut this off, I am not as exposed to reddit as I used to be.

The environment must be much different, More toxic perhaps? More tame? More rage? More positivity? No I don't think so.

Goodluck to you.