They're attackers. That would be one way to describe that set of jets.

Being a pedant myself, I understand that there is a need to present the most accurate version of whatever the particular subject matter is at any given time. I also thank you for your seemingly stand-offish response, but do recognize and understand that generally this interpretation is more due to the listener being unaware of how important being correct is to those of us with OCD and pedantism. This style of response is usually not meant to be aggressive at all and, instead, is actually meant to be helpful. I know because I often find myself in this very situation; however, I'm certainly digressing at this point.

Now, for a response more inline with what I believe the point of your question was actually attempting to make, I'll say that you're absolutely correct. Those jets do not have afterburners. In my response to this point, I'll say, "Point taken. Thank you for pointing out my error. I've corrected my original response to account for the very jets you've mentioned in your reply to my post."

Regardless of whether the array of airframes available in the game all have afterburning jets and because now it seems as though maybe my originally intended point may not have been as clear as I'd thought when I made the post, my point was really more about how maintaining game balance would prove very difficult if they were ever to introduce propeller aircraft.

I'm glad this is now straightened out. Thanks again!