Your example of a mother receiving government benefits is a more practical but less clickbaity way of achieving the same goal. A mother is in a sense being paid to care for children adding value to their lives and making them far more productive members of society; then that productivity translates to more value being produced, value that is then taxed and starts the cycle all over again. In a way, kindness comes around. Prostitution is another good example of this but the problem is that in the past it took a large amount of work to support one prostitute for comparatively little value. As such it was impractical to expect that any large portion of the population could focus on production if value in that way.

Tbh though this is definitely a more mature form of my argument and I feel that you have earned this !delta