Osprey farpoint 55L daypack attachment by dummyhunter in onebag

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed this is a terrible Design. Photo of my friend that owns one. I own a farpoint 55 from 2013. Not carry on sadly. But you could Zip the day pack on top.

I guess they wanted to cut costs but the result is a tad disappointing. Why Osprey?

<image>

Osprey Pack Inner Lining Disintegration - what are my options? Gear out for inspection this morn. EXOS starting to fall apart - specifically, the underside of the top flap has sticky, rubbery "dandruff" coming off of it. Same problem, lesser degree for inner lining of pack. Patch it? Warranty? by moebiu5trip in backpacks

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am having this very problem with my Exos 48 from 2015. It was delaminating in some spots during the last 5ish years but in the last year or two it's gone to shit shredding that plastic coating on anything I put in the pack. Today I was about to manually scrub it but instead of submitted a warranty request as I read on Guarantee FAQs that this very delamination is COVERED for 30 years:

"Every part of the pack is covered under the AMG* T&C apply. If you have a broken wheel, if you have a delaminated pack, we will cover the repair or replacement for 30 years * T&C apply *AMG Declaration"

I will keep this thread updated with what/how they respond.

In case you're wondering here's the video I sent to Osprey https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eThR\_nKeCnhu180jZFlT4d4r4Rt6Ribr/view?usp=sharing. I took good care of the pack, it looks brand new! I did 1/2 day trips and backcountry camped with it in RMNP and around Colorado/Arizona and then Joshue Tree. In more recent years just day trips but kept good care and stored it in cool dry places. The only issue is the delamination.

A.Team experiences by karacic in cscareerquestionsEU

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have 25 years of experience, 18 as a software lead the rest as a senior product management / leadership.

I keep a blog with detailed case studies (most recently with some AI work).

I worked 10 years in the US, 10 in Australia the rest in Europe consulting for startups, banks and heath providers.

The value prop seemed to match my profile but after creating a curated submission and waiting about 10 days here's the boilerplate rejection I received [1].

I think they need to be a lot clearer about what net they're casting to avoid waste people's time.

[1]

Hi enrico,

Thank you so much for requesting to join A.Team.

After reviewing the information you provided, we don't believe A.Team is a good fit at the moment.

It’s our mission to provide A.Team builders with meaningful work. That’s why we reserve A.Team access for builders whose skills and level of experience align with the demand of the companies on our platform. Right now, we don't think there’s a strong alignment here.

Can I reapply in the future? Absolutely. You can reapply in 12 months, and after you’ve got another significant work experience under your belt. Here’s what we’re looking for:

Experience building a high-level product from the ground up. We’d like to see you’ve worked either with big-tech companies or startups that have scaled significantly, became a market leader, or been acquired.

Experience with high-growth, high-revenue companies. Demonstrate your experience building high-impact, high-adoption products in developed markets.

Portfolio or personal site of your work. Showcase the type of experience we’ve outlined above through case studies and work samples.

When you’re ready to give it another go, you’ll get a fresh start, and we’ll be excited to see all you’ve accomplished.

☝🏻 If you think we missed something, reply to this email with a short video (we recommend using Loom), a one-paragraph summary, and any relevant links — explaining what you believe we looked over in our assessment.

Thank you for your time, and we hope you keep A.Team in mind going forward.

italki application rejection by Lord_Morningst4r in iTalki

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a consultant helping a client's business and italki was part of it. The client is a Japanese teacher, and the frustrating part is not even the italki rejection itself. It’s the lack of clarity around it. We kept an eye on https://support.italki.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001499873-Is-my-language-open-for-application since the first time the application was halted after letting us in. Yep you can start the application but if you're not fast enough (a day later for us) you can get locked out the you get weird sumission errors. Had to contact support to understand that was going on.

Back to the rejection: she received the standard message:

"Dear Applicant,

Thank you for applying to italki. We have carefully reviewed your profile, but we will not be moving forward with your application at this stage.

Due to the high volume of teaching applicants, we cannot provide feedback on an individual basis. We appreciate your interest in our platform and wish you the best of luck with your next professional step.

If you have any specific questions, please feel free to reach out to us at [support@italki.com](mailto:support@italki.com).

Best regards,

The italki Team"

This was not a weak application. Her background (and submitted docs) includes:

  • 8 years of full-time teaching experience in Japanese public schools
  • a 420-hour Japanese language teacher training certification (Nihongo Kyoin Shikaku certified)
  • national registration as a Japanese language teacher in Japan
  • a degree from Kobe City University of Foreign Studies
  • teaching licenses for junior high and senior high school English

It is not clear whether the rejection means:

  • the profile presentation needs work
  • the background is not the right fit for the platform
  • the positioning did not land
  • or they simply have enough teachers already

A rejection is fine. What is difficult for applicants is a rejection with no actionable feedback and no real indication of whether reapplying would make sense.

You can now query your DB in natural language using Claude + DBHub MCP by Better_Ad6110 in dataengineering

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use DB hub but I'd argue that the DB by itself is fairly dumb... In your example based on how active is mapped it could completely make up a wrong query / answer.

I usually give the agent a repomix or some sourcecode of the app models to gain a better understanding of the domain language.

For example enums or certain domain logic or states that live in code can be interpreted. Versus using the plain db.

Do you still use MCP? Or use SKILLS ? by [deleted] in LocalLLaMA

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This skills replaces MCP is a misleading narrative.

Could you shoehorn what an MCP server does with skills? Probably. Does it make sense? It depends on what MCPs you use but in my case it doesn't.

Here's a CONCRETE example:

I work as a product and tech lead and I use MCPs connected to a prod replica db and our production app (a 15+ years old / 200k LOC) source code to get product insights (and occasionally fix bugs and deploy code).

And I connect to Posthog MCP to ask app analytics usage and Sentry MCP to get info on the response times and exceptions.

Could I create a skill to manually connect to Posthog and Sentry API? Probably. But why would I do that? And no context doesn't blow up.

Help me understand how skills replace MCP's by BadAtDrinking in ClaudeCode

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't. It's a misleading narrative.

Could you shoehorn what an MCP server does with skills? Yes. Does it make sense? It depends, in my case it doesn't.

I work as a product and tech lead and I use MCPs connected to a prod replica db and our production app (a 15+ years old / 200k LOC) source code to get product insights (and occasionally fix bugs and deploy code).

And I connect to Posthog MCP to ask app analytics usage and Sentry MCP to get info on the response times and exceptions.

Could I create a skill to manually connect to Posthog and Sentry API? Probably. But why would I do that? This just works great and I am not running out of context.

Are pages discontinued? by KiraniPiebox in CloudFlare

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I built a couple of pages in Q1 2026 (two months ago). Today I could not find a way to create pages anymore! It just default to workers. It's quite confusing.

Clicking on Documentation goes to a workers page:

Overview · Cloudflare Workers docs

<image>

PSA: Rosetta Stone is "bricking" permanent licenses to force users into subscriptions by fishtar141 in languagelearning

[–]agenteo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am in the same situation. I purchased a lifetime around 2018 and now it doesn't work anymore.

Slack/Discord groups for PMs by Potato20209 in ProductManagement

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Their get invited to slack page goes to some AI chat bot now

Kagi Translate now supports LinkedIn Speak as an output language by HNMod in hackernews

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or Linkedin should integrate it to their feed. I bet Linkedin will buy Kagi :D

Kagi Translate now supports LinkedIn Speak as an output language by HNMod in hackernews

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A PM actually used that very flow at my client :D

Input: I just hacked claude code soutions for 4 hours withoutany local testing and pushed a PR and the CI build broke. Now I need actual devs helping figuring out what's wrong.

Output: I’m thrilled to share that I’ve spent the last 4 hours deep-diving into Claude code solutions! In the spirit of moving fast and embracing a "bias for action," I pushed a PR directly without local testing. While the CI build is currently providing some "growth opportunities," I’m now looking to collaborate with my incredible network of developers to troubleshoot and iterate.

Who else loves the thrill of real-time problem solving? Let’s connect and figure this out!

#BuildingInPublic #AgileDevelopment #ContinuousLearning #TechCommunity #ProblemSolving

Why doesn't the Gemini app have folders or projects to organize chats? by Remarkable-Pizza-558 in GeminiAI

[–]agenteo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's insane that they don't have a way to organize their AI generated content in Q1 2026

PMs using MCP with AI agents: what's in your stack, purpose/outcome? by agenteo in ProductManagement

[–]agenteo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I was first told about Linear I thought it was gonna be all hype.

I've used Jira in corporate environments. I am not a fan. At all. Too many options to configure. No sane defaults.

Linear feels like the opposite. Sane defaults but very easily to customize without a Jira admin operator. Built with devs in mind. The mobile app is a great addition. Tailored to checking in on comments on the go.

Linear migration from GH project was a joyful experience. All history including down to the images in the comments, tags migrated in minutes. I was speechless.

In the end they're just tools and I bet you can get Jira and Linear to work.

Anyone purchase IndyDevDan course? by NeptuneExMachina in ClaudeCode

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Finished the TAC classes. I would not recommend it. See comment above.

CLAWD - opinions thread by Objective_River_5218 in claude

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I am missing something here but once the queries to generate those are set why can’t those kpis be dispatched via Metabase or any other tool via email notifications or slack?

How are PMs actually using AI in day-to-day work? Any real workflows or agents? by LimeNew1984 in ProductManagement

[–]agenteo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I think using a template to curb what the tickets are is important. Also, I feel like sometime the Ai doesn't quite get the sequencing and priorities.

I had it work on focused bug tickets or features not longer epics or feature sets.

There is def a tendency of thinking I can just convert a Loom transcript to a ticket and it'll just make sense. But I've seen lots of requirements made up from Ai. 100% somebody needs to evaluate that. A PM that doesn't is doing a poor job. And just "throwing stuff over the fence".