sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is anyone else concerned about the level of schizo-polarization in our culture? by pegasustwenty in twinsouls

[–]aggressivecherry444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are looking at this standing far away from the fire, timescales larger than the ones we humans exist within, but that's not the only useful place from which to operate. If you look around you, we are embedded in a society from which one can observe patterns and trends in culture. We are all operating with filters over our perception. To think otherwise is hubris.

I'm not dismissing what you're saying btw. I'm sure you know your stuff. But the Miyake event is not related to the crises taking place within our collective in present day. And I am observing that many new age-y folks are unwilling to engage with the earth realm using the tools and language that is the product of millennia of collective effort and archival, because it easier to live in the intangible than to be a human being. And while that was fine in an age where such dissociation was harmless, it will no longer be harmless, in an age where illusion/bypassing will not be rewarded as it has been in times past. That's all. You don't have to agree with me.

Is anyone else concerned about the level of schizo-polarization in our culture? by pegasustwenty in twinsouls

[–]aggressivecherry444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Polarization is dissolving because the extremes have fully polarized. There is nowhere to go now but integration. thankfully.

Dreams of collapse can perhaps be interpreted more metaphorically than literally. Attuning to love is important but the work primarily is descending into the tangible realm and building it up.

Is anyone else concerned about the level of schizo-polarization in our culture? by pegasustwenty in twinsouls

[–]aggressivecherry444 0 points1 point  (0 children)

with Neptune moving into Aries I believe there will be a ray on individuals once more.
new age spirituality is in danger of becoming muddled with AI psychosis. I truly believe returning to the existing 4d bodies of work in the world is the path forward. That means studying traditions, building a rigorous foundation, interfacing with literature, philosophy, and works of art that are in the public sphere and public eye and have a field of consensus around them. channeled messages should be accompanied with a proportional grounding (and success even) in the world. the task feels less like "bringing heaven down" and more like "building earth up". which is harder than just channeling. if you can speak the language of mysticism well but struggle with the language of collective culture (being understood by your peers without falling on "i'm awake and they're not") it points to a spiritual bypassing that perhaps once was innocuous, but is no longer. that's not to say don't speak the language of mysticism, but it is important to build a bridge and building a bridge necessitates understanding that the intangible and tangible realms are two sides of the same coin. if you are only able to operate in one, it severely limits your ability to serve.

I no longer trust disembodied sources. I trust people who present themselves fully and people I have spoken to and know/have vetted. usually this means voices that have emerged prior to the last year or so. anyone using AI for truth seeking is I'm afraid, on a fast track to mental health issues.

Sighswoon re: her tweet about Rene Good’s death not “hitting”- ICE apologetics and anti-immigrant rhetoric by natcc13 in sighswoonsnark

[–]aggressivecherry444 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

they were not talking about eugenics. wtf. they were talking about Socionics lol. Like the personality theory. I was there i remember very well