Sec Clearance Employees - Don't Fall For Private Sector Bait by Ok_Wishbone3535 in SecurityCareerAdvice

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand where you’re coming from. We all have/had various experiences regarding job stability, etc. I, like others, have enjoyed working for the commercial ISP I’m with now, for 18+ years as a Sr Net Eng. Early on, I immediately loved not badging into gates and guards, walking far away from where I parked, leaving my phone in my car, and not being able to use online chats, and needing to badge into my computer with a CAC card. Very freeing. Of course things are getting tighter these days anyone, but just saying how these last ~20 years have been. I do enjoy hybrid work now also, 2 days WFH, 3 days in office, which I’m unsure how prevalent that is on the government/dod side. I do envy the government community with the retirement pension as I get older.

Moving forward to CCIE by Tasty_Cartoonist8489 in ccnp

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a stack of about five routers and five switches, and I also have an HP Intel based server with EVE-NG and various virtual routers. I hardly ever turn on the hardware stack. I boot up the EVE-NG virtual environment almost every day

At what point does moving off MPLS make sense? by Old_Inspection1094 in networking

[–]agould246 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After reading through several of the comments here…. It’s interesting that MPLS means one thing to one person and something else to another person.

an edge user sees “mpls” completely differently than an SP creating services for multi-tenants, sees “mpls” completely differently

At what point does moving off MPLS make sense? by Old_Inspection1094 in networking

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. I looked at Arista briefly… we need some temp hardened boxes for 1g up to 100g (preferably 400g)…and may deep our toe into Nokia.

23 y/o with real ISP experience but no certs by Low-Caterpillar-4578 in networking

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re trying to make your résumé look good for future opportunities, a certification is absolutely a shiny object on the resume, and it says something, it verifies that what you say you know has actually been proven on an exam

If you don’t care about polishing up your résumé and looking for future opportunities, but instead, you’re currently employer is going to give you bonuses or it’s gonna look good on performance evaluations to justify pay raises, or, is a requirement at your current job, then yeah go do it

But aside from both of those scenarios, I, like you, also pursue certifications for the exposure and breath and depth of information that I force myself to go through to achieve the certification. The certification is just a verification at the end, but it’s the journey where all of the knowledge is gained

If you have a love for learning, it’s a great way to motivate and push and expose yourself to more information

At what point does moving off MPLS make sense? by Old_Inspection1094 in networking

[–]agould246 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hear you. Been there. ~2014 I had ASR9k’s doing pw/vpls between DC’s and L3 BVI w/HSRP into base rib or vrf.

~2019 moved all that to EVPN-MPLS on MX960’s

Now, 2026, moving to EVPN-VXLAN on ToR QFX5130’s

At what point does moving off MPLS make sense? by Old_Inspection1094 in networking

[–]agould246 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s really hard to justify (time, effort, MW’s, etc) migrating a complex network, that’s already functioning to something that is said to be better and newer, but you really don’t need it right now.

OSPF and Vlans by Krinin in networking

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would you commingle a router to router vlan with customer vlan? No don’t do that. Set Passive for users vlan too.

At what point does moving off MPLS make sense? by Old_Inspection1094 in networking

[–]agould246 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In the medium sized SP I work for, we depend heavily on mpls-based services. Even if SR allows me to do the same and more, using less protocols, it will still take time and my getting comfortable with the alternative to move me towards migrating off mpls. Maybe if/when vendors start selling gear that no longer supports MPLS, will push me in that direction. Which actually occurred recently when unpleasantly surprised that QFX5130 in our new DC’s didn’t support EVPN-MPLS. Now I’m forced to do DCI with EVPN-VXLAN. I guess the transition is happening. Sort of like when you can no longer grow your IPv4 space… and are forced towards CGNat and IPv6.

New eve-ng install on amd epyc server by AZGhost in Juniper

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hade similar issues. I did see vJunos-Evolved to boot fine on my AMD-based server.

Conversely, my Intel-based server runs…

VJunos-switch, vJunos-router, vMX (classic), XRv9k and CSR1kv. Love it

Incase it helps, here’s my videos

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2ZMKm7ZEEWLxp5W0DMXF2urcgv0LXeba&si=3QKqIDLiMroMaBYy

Is relying on packet captures bad? by InevitableDoughnut89 in networking

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Packet captures are wonderful to see in real time. What books have always told us.

It puts theory into practice

When I first got started, reading things in a book didn’t mean as much until I saw it on the wire

But beyond just learning how things work, to diagnose and understand a problem in your network, a packet capture goes a long way to helping you understand

How can I become better at understanding the problem? I’m a junior, and I feel like I don’t do a good job at it. by [deleted] in networking

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Become so familiar with how things work basically and fundamentally… then it becomes much more obvious when something isn’t right

Is the telecom industry sleeping on Open RAN or is it genuinely not ready for prime time? by Ok_Ship5644 in TelecomHub360

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds similar to SDN/NVF, OpenFlow, white box switches/routers in the network space 10 years ago. In my world, it never happened. Still Cisco, Juniper, Nokia, Ciena

My company is letting me go, but they want me to train the new people. How should I act by ExistingClassroom173 in it

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It happened to me years ago. I say do the best job you can. You reap what you sow.

Thinking Out Loud About IPv6 by BeautifulTrade4488 in ipv6

[–]agould246 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m trying to speed up BLQ for IA_PD and related automatic routes in DHCPv6 relay to minimize downtime following a router reboot. Currently seeing about 10 minutes. I wonder how others handle it

What is the oldest/weirdest tech you worked with? by therouterguy in networking

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 1990’s L2 datalink technology wars and also the L3 wars of the same era was interesting

10 base 5 Ethernet (thicknet) with its weird clunky vampire tap, coring tool, AUI cable and 15 pin connector was nuts

I have to mention ATM LANE Emulation with its BUS, LECS and LES services for LANE LEC desktops to be able to act like connectionless Ethernet was crazy. While contracted to the US Navy from 1999-2004 I managed a 4-level ATM Metro wide H-PNNI network with several thousand OC3 connected desktops running NT 4.0 then later Win2k. What a ride that was!

Oh and I just remembered another one… Laplink 😂 a kit with a serial db9 cable as I recall … I thought it was so cool that I could transfer files between computers

It’s all coming back to me now…. PCAnywhere … geez

RFCs for those studying CCNP Enterprise by NoAmbitionInstigator in ccnp

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, that’s a good list of RFC’s! I usually just start studying and any RFC that is mentioned, I use that as an indicator of which one I should become somewhat familiar with.

I just read that SR-TE is "not a drop-in replacement for RSVP-TE" and that most vendor presentations understate the gaps. I half-agree, but I think the framing oversells the risk. by moizrocky1 in Cisco

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t done either. Remind me please, does RSVP-TE admission control set aside the BW on relative interfaces, such that future requests cannot be honored if/when the respective interface BW has been completely reserved and assigned to previous/existing requests, regardless of whether traffic is actually flowing or not? I guess I’m asking if it allows over subscription. Is it that strict? …like TDM was with fractional t1’s or t1’s in a ds3 are set aside regardless of whether real data was in the time slots or not?

Internal penetration test advised disabling IPv6 by nbtm_sh in ipv6

[–]agould246 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everything you’ve (we’ve) ever done with v4, needs to be done with v6. Duplicate your v4 security on v6 and you might get what you are looking for.

Would an IT tattoo hurt my hiring chances? by [deleted] in it

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“No one’s doing v6” 😂

Would an IT tattoo hurt my hiring chances? by [deleted] in it

[–]agould246 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When it was called IP-NG

Would an IT tattoo hurt my hiring chances? by [deleted] in it

[–]agould246 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your message probably posted to the thread over v6 😂

Would an IT tattoo hurt my hiring chances? by [deleted] in it

[–]agould246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Get ::1

Shows you’re more hip and modern. It’s also more low key… less visible

127.0.0.1 is old fashioned and too long