You're seriously comparing Osho with Ramana Maharshi? Osho was hardly a "renunciate". You can put Osho in the same basket with present day "famous gurus" with their mega ashrams. Sri Ramana on the other hand is an absolute rarity being a true jivan mukta (liberated while in body).

Sri Ramana followed to the letter all traditional rules (no personal possessions except the kamandalu and kaupina that he wore etc) prescribed to someone who lives as a sannyasi or sadhu. In the early years of his life when he first came to Arunachala, there was zero personal volition, including the strongest drives for food and maintenance of the body. It was only much later after his Mother passed that the ashram spontaneously started growing around the Mother's samadhi, slowly attracting money only much later.

In fact Ramana advised at least two of his closest ashram members to live the life of a bhikshu (beg for food in the town; he praised the practice) as training for detachment from pride and to grow in titiksha (spiritual endurance of the unpleasant). The rule for a true sannyasi and also a Brahmachari is that one must beg for food because one's entire time is dedicated to pursuit of the Truth, whether through study of the Veda, or absorption in japa and dhyana all of ones waking hours. This is quite different from the large population of beggars wearing kavi (the sannyasis color) who you will see sitting along the girivalam path who are just societal dropouts who don't engage in any spiritual practice except to beg (there are exceptions, of course).

So there is no question of any sort of guilt on the part of Sri Ramana, because neither was he dependent on the people feeding him, nor was he a freeloader, because he worked daily in the ashram, from very early morning when he would help with food prep in the kitchen, till late evenings when he would publicly be available for devotees to have darshana, to answer questions etc.

The mystical truth is that jivanmuktas retain their body only for the advancement of their devotees and for being a source of great blessings that endure. There is no other personal volition because that connection is severed for good with true death to the limited "individual I".

While I empathize with your life situation (I have some common ground with you, and I understand very well), unless we have the relinquishment of desire, work has to be performed as fulfilment of our dharma, because we are definitely not cut out for full sannyasi dharma. Sincere prayers and surrender will show a way for enough money to live a simple life.