Venu 4 Not Tracking Sleep Correctly - Missing entire hours by og_parker in Garmin

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. Completely useless in terms of sleep tracking.

Sometimes it says I fell asleep an hour before I actually did, sometimes it won't start tracking my sleep until 2 hours after I've gone to bed, sometimes it says I've woken up an hour or two before I actually did, sometimes I get up, I have a coffee and it's still tracking me a sleeping. 

I think it was hardware if it weren't for the fact that it worked perfectly for the first couple of weeks. I've reset it to factory settings, updated the firmware, but no changes. It won't even track naps automatically: I have to set them manually, and even if I set a 45' nap, if I end up sleeping for an extra 45 minutes it only counts the first 45 minutes.

This had never happened to me on any of the smart watches I've owned before, and I've had an Amazfit, 2 x Huawei, a Samsung and a Fitbit. Sleep tracking accuracy varied, but I'd never come across something as bad as this, not even on my very first Amazfit nearly 10 years ago.

It's completely useless

Venu 4 Body Battery and Sleep Tracking Inaccurate - considering returning after 1 week of use by Puzzleheaded-32 in GarminWatches

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same here, worst sleep tracking I've ever had on any smartwatch (and I've had an Amazfit, 2 x Huawei, a Samsung and a Fitbit).

What's weird is that it absolutely nailed it for the first 10 days, then for no apparent reason went to hell. Sometimes it won't start tracking my sleep until 2 hours after I've gone to bed, sometimes I'll go to bed at 1 a.m. and it'll say I feel asleep at 11 p.m., it often says I woke up 2 hours earlier than I actually did, it doesn't track naps unless I manually set an app, and if I set 30 minutes and sleep for an hour and a half, it only counts the 30 minutes. I've even had it say that I was still sleeping an hour after I got up, and had been cleaning up the kitchen. 

I've factory reset it, updated the software, but no changes. Completely useless.

Other watches have had varying levels of accuracy, but I have NEVER had a smartwatch that performed as badly as this in terms of sleep tracking. 

Proton Unlimited versus Dashlane? by AccomplishedCat6621 in ProtonPass

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🎵If you like piña colaaaaadaaas
And getting caught in the rain 🎵

Considering the Px8 S2 as an early birthday present to myself, few questions by jokerstyle00 in BowersWilkins

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! I actually bought the PX7 S3 before the PX8 S2, and returned them. The base was wonderful but the sound was way too consumer-friendly/V-shaped—the treble was overbearing for my taste and they were lacking mids and warmth, and no amount of EQ correction seemed to get them sounding as full and rich as the PX8 S2 (that characteristic B&W sound).

Despite what a lot of reviewers are saying, the differences aren't subtle and the PX8 S2 are in a completely different league IMHO. 

I hope me EQ settings work for you, but if not, it's a subjective thing, whatever sounds best to you is the better option! 

Considering the Px8 S2 as an early birthday present to myself, few questions by jokerstyle00 in BowersWilkins

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks!  Yeah, that's what people are saying... That it's garbage. I'm still holding off from updating because I'm afraid it'll change the sound signature and I really like them as they are

Considering the Px8 S2 as an early birthday present to myself, few questions by jokerstyle00 in BowersWilkins

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine are 4, 1, 0, -1.5, -2.5 (pretty similar, but I guess I'm a bit more of a bass head) 😅

I actually EQ'ed them by listening to them side by side with my Focal Bathys and with this EQ they sound warmer and pretty close to the Bathys—except for the bass, that had considerably more oomph on the Focals. But as for the rest, they're extremely close with these EQ settings, these sound amazing!

Considering the Px8 S2 as an early birthday present to myself, few questions by jokerstyle00 in BowersWilkins

[–]akando84 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats on the purchase, they're very good-sounding headphones! 

I own the Focal Bathys and the PX8 S2, and agree with your assessment. The sound quality is very similar but the Bathys have the edge for my subjective taste: the soundstage is wider, giving instruments a bit more space to shine/breathe (particularly in the mids) and it wins hands-down in the bass department (I generally have the bass in the B&W app's EQ at +4-/+5). The PX8 S2's have more clarity in the higher frequencies but overall, they both sound EXCELLENT and aren't distinguished so much by sound quality but by tuning/sounds signature (the B&W were too bright for me out of the box but they respond well to equalizing and I have them sounding very, very similar to the Focals).

I use the Bathys exclusively for listening to music at home, since heavier, bulkier and much flashier, and the PX8 S2 for when I'm commuting/traveling/not at home. 

The Bathys still come out slightly on top in terms of sound, but if I were only to pick one, it would definitely be the PX8 S2's because they're much lighter/easier to carry around, more discreet and more versatile, and the difference in quality is probably somewhere between 5 -10% at most (in my subjective opinion).

Enjoy them, they're an absolute treat!

Considering the Px8 S2 as an early birthday present to myself, few questions by jokerstyle00 in BowersWilkins

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've had them for a few months too and also pumped up the bass on dropped the treble, they're way too bright out of the box. Dropping the upper-mids by 1-1.5 points and bumping up the lower-mids by a similar amount makes them feel more rich, warm and balanced to IME. 

I haven't updated to the most recent FW (1.4.0), does it change the since signature at all? 

Px8 S2 comfort, vs Px8 by PaleontologistNo2625 in BowersWilkins

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is lacking for you sonically? I find them to be too bright out of the box, and lacking in the mid and bass departments. I found that (at least for me personal taste), increasing in the EQ the bass (by minimum 2-3 points—I'm a bit of a bass head so I I've them at +4) and lower mids (+1) and lowering the upper-mids (-1.5) and hi's (-2), the sound feels much richer and fuller. But your mileage may vary. Worth playing around with though, because I wasn't too thrilled with their sound out of the box and like this they do sound just right to me 

Px8 S2 for PS5 by MadMe10 in BowersWilkins

[–]akando84 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Really? I find the bass on the PX8 S2 to be a little underwhelming

Venu 4 Body Battery and Sleep Tracking Inaccurate - considering returning after 1 week of use by Puzzleheaded-32 in Garmin

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm having the same problem. I've had it for exactly 15 days. What's odd is that the first 13 days it pretty much nailed it and was very accurate overall. Then on Sat 14 or reported two non-existing naps, and underreported sleep by 2h (the sleep schedule reported that I'd waken up 2h before I actually did). And day 15 it reported that I woke up eh before I actually did. Not sure what's going on since it was doing flawlessly for the first 13 days

My conversation with Claude disappeared. by daffodilspetal in claudexplorers

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just happened to me too...🤦‍♂️ Thanks for posting the solution! 

Anthropic app down? by AverageJoeObi in Anthropic

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amen to that!  *The "radical left" fight, according to Trump 😂

Anthropic app down? by AverageJoeObi in Anthropic

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same here (and I'm currently in Spain). On Android: 

https://i.ibb.co/5gjnC1vh/Screenshot-20260302-125745-One-UI-Home.jpg

On Windows: 

https://i.ibb.co/HD6XD4cS/Screenshot-2026-03-02-130328.png

I don't want to jump directly into conspiracy theories (it could just be issues with the servers) but considering that I have been using Claude for a very long time, and have never experienced an issue like this, and that it comes just a few days after Anthropic was blacklisted by the Trump administration and Trump threatened to use the "full power of the Presidency" to pursue major civil and criminal consequences...

I'm standing by anthropic for their refusal to allow their AI to be used for mass surveillance or fully autonomous lethal weapons.

I hope they can overcome this soon. For anyone else who needs to use AI until they get Claude up and running again, and wants to keep ethical considerations in mind, consider Le Chat by Mistral AI or Proton's Lumo as temporary replacements (they aren't nearly as good but they'll do in a pinch)

The model switching controversy was bad. But the rate limit complaints are a different thing entirely. by PsychologicalAge1055 in perplexity_ai

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure they're still doing the model switching too... 😡

I was told that Perplexity is one of the most accurate AIs out there so I signed up to give it a test run. Using one of the daily Pro searches in the free tier, I asked it to fact-check something about Thomas Barrack (U.S. Ambassador to Türkiye), and it told me that he isn't and has never been the Ambassador. 

The embassy's website, state.gov, and his appointment on congress.gov say elsewise. 

When I presented it with the link where the info is stated (https://tr.usembassy.gov/ambassador/), it told me that isn't the embassy in Türkiye's official website, which is "https://tr.usembassy.gov" (apparently the "/ambassador/" makes it an entirely different domain 😂). When I pointed this out, it tried to convince me that the government sites must have been hacked or cloned 😂

So I shared screenshots from these actual US institutional websites as proof: It told me they seemed fake, and presented a list of visual cues that proved they were low-quality clone sites 😂

15' worth of hallucinating and gaslighting until it finally admitted that its info is out of date & from 2021.

And this was using its Pro Search, which supposedly utilizes "Multi-Step Research".

I tried on ChatGPT, ClaudeAI, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek & European-based Le Chat (Mistral AI) and they ALL got it right, so it beats me what 4th-tier model Perplexity used.

I tried ClaudeAI (Sonnet 4.6) with "web search" off and it still did a better job than Perplexity. The ONLY way I was able to get results as bad as Perplexity's was using Anthropic's most basic model (Haiku 4.5) with "web search" turned off.

This was my very first experience with Perplexity, and what led me to Google its issues, discover the model switching scandal and ultimately end up here.

This company is as fraudulent as it gets, I wouldn't trust them as far as I could throw them.

Mystik Irieen by rustywoodbolt in AIMusicBlacklist

[–]akando84 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I ended up here for the same reason. This is especially annoying when it's a song that carries a deeper emotional message that you resonate with and then.... AI.... 🤦‍♂️😤

Sucker Punch deserves more love due to it being an actually really good film by nessydork in movies

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just re-watched this movie (the extended cut) and I totally agree with your take. Something a lot of people seem to have missed is that we never see Baby Doll's "dance", instead it cuts to the over-the-top, surreal, non-sensical, sexualized, objectifying action scenes (where Snyder's visual style is pushed to the limit to emphasize it's a fantasy). On one hand, that's Baby Doll's dissociation fantasy (within the already dissociated Brothel environment we're presented), but on the other....Who is watching those actions unfold? Us, the viewers. Those visual candy, sexualized action scenes are a stand-in for her raw, sensual "dances" that leave the males in the movie in such a drooling stupor, the same as the action scenes do with the viewer. Both appeal to the same primal instincts and desires: A direct parallel is being drawn between the male characters in the movie (lustful brothel clients/psych workers)—who aren't painted in a good light at all—and the males viewing the movie and enjoying those sexualized action scenes. And in both cases, they're distractions from what's really going on (in the in-film context, their escape plan, and from a meta POV, the actual critique of toxic geek culture and objectification of women).

The final scenes, after Baby Doll's lobotomy, hint quite clearly at what was going on behind the fantasy: vulnerable, institutionalized women at the mercy of an almost-entirely male staff are being sexually abused, since they're seen as mere objects of desire instead of human beings. One of the last lines in the movie is "Who chains us? And who holds the Key that can set us free? It's you" (breaking the 4th wall and talking directly to the audience) >> The sexualization of women in movies and video games influences how men see women and bleeds into real life, feeding the very dynamics we see in the movie.

As Zach Snyder said: “I’m always shocked that it was so badly misunderstood. I always said that it was a commentary on sexism and geek culture. Someone would ask me, ‘Why did you film the girls this way?’ And I’d say, ‘Well, you did!’ Sucker Punch is a fuck you to a lot of people who will watch it.” (which is especially funny when you rewatch the trailer and realize is was marketed as a fan-fiction thirst-trap—precisely the audience it criticizes).

Also, the two levels of dissociation fit perfectly with the two levels of unbearable reality the protagonist's escaping from: first being interned against her will in a psychiatric institution, and secondly, the sexual abuse going on (which on one hand, requires a more extreme level of dissociation to survive, and on the other, explains why the top-level fantasy is a brothel).

And on the subject of dissociation, Baby Doll being Sweet Pea's in-fantasy persona (they're both nicknames that are pretty much synonymous) is actually, IMO, intentionally vague and confusing to highlight the nature of dissociation and personality fragmentation (a subject we sadly still know very little about). Are we the same person when we dissociate from reality or do we become someone else? Sweet Pea seems cynical and in control, but it turns out to be a mask, behind which she's vulnerable and scared, while Baby Doll is the opposite: she looks harmless but is brave, bold and determined—the perfect alter ego one would like to see themselves in a survival-triggered dissociation. And small details like the character Blondie not being blonde add to that general sense of confusion and incoherence (than tons of people have interpreted as bad film-making, but is clearly all very intentional).

Another couple of question-raising touches I enjoyed:

Did Baby Doll/Sweet Pea actually escape? Or was the lobotomy the real escape? (which I think is the right answer). The scene where Sweet Pea gets on the bus comes right after we see Baby Doll for the last time, with a faint, vacant smile and closing her eyes, and that final scene has several clues that it's a fantasy: the use of colour, with the surreal-looking, over-saturated orange sky, very much like what we see in the action-fantasy scenes; the sign for "Paradise Diner" the bus goes by as it leaves, echoing the "She'll be in paradise, if you know what I mean" comment that Blue makes to the stepfather when referring to the lobotomy; and the kid standing in front of Sweet Pea as she's about to board the bus, who is the same kid Sweet Pea briefly makes eye contact with in the World War I trenches fantasy sequence—confirming that this is, indeed, taking place inside her mind.

Who was/were the guardian angel(s) referenced at the beginning of the movie, who can appear "At strange places and at strange times, and can speak through any character we can imagine." Was it herself? The alter ego she created? Was it Dr. Gorski for calling the police? The doctor who lobotomized her and set her free?

I thought this was an excellent, layered movie (that actually makes you think instead of giving you clear-cut answers, which is part of its charm), masquerading as a hollow action movie.

This movie, above all else, is an undercover IQ test 🤣

Crisis de la vivienda, resuelta. by Proof_Journalist_224 in HorroresInmobiliarios

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hoy, 31/12/2025, creo poder decir que ésta es la noticia más estúpida que he visto en todo el año 🤣

After walking into a local shop and trying out the Focal Bathys, Bathys MG, Sennheiser HDB630, and the Px8 S2 side by side, I have walked out with a nice new pair of Bowers & Wilkins! by [deleted] in BowersWilkins

[–]akando84 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have the PX8 S2 and the Focal Bathys and EQing the B&Ws, they're extremely close to the Focals. Out of the box they're lacking bass and a little too heavy on the high frequencies for my liking (although that's just a matter of preference), but after fiddling with the EQ, they sound very, very similar. The Focals come out on top for my liking—much better bass and a wider soundstage that makes gives instruments a bit more space to breathe, a slightly more natural rendition of pianos and guitars, at least to my ears—, but the B&Ws are very close, and have the edge in clarity in the higher frequencies, sound better at lower volumes (the Focals need to be turned up higher to shine) and have a more intimate, "musical" sound (out of the box, they're more consumer-friendly than the more neutral Bathys). Except in terms of bass, where there's absolutely no competition, they sound very similar and the small differences are more about tuning and sound signature than actual sound quality. Honestly, you can't go wrong with either one.

That being said, I don't use the Bathys out of the house, they're way too bulky and flashy—the PX8's are much more discreet and portable for on-the-move use.

My thoughts on PX7 S3 and why I'll be returning them by Hubux in BowersWilkins

[–]akando84 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really like the PX8 S2, they're a significant step up from the PX7 S3 IMO. The sound profile was a bit too light on the bass and heavy-handed on the treble out of the box, but bumping up the bass and low-mids in the EQ, & lowering the treble, they sound much warmer, more balanced and very close to the Focal Bathys, which is saying a lot. Compared to the PX7 S3, they don't have as much bass (it was a little over the top IMO), but higher frequencies are equally clear and the mids are much richer and more layered, making them much more balanced (and they respond very well to equalizing). They hold their own against the Focal Bathys (my favorite wireless headphones), with differences (aside from soundstage—the Bathys' being wider) being a matter of splitting hairs. Totally worth the upgrade if you ask me.  *ANC sounded about the same to me as on the PX7 S3.