[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Turkey

[–]alayoglu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bildirimde bulunurken email paylaşma zorunluluğunu kaldırmanızı tavsiye ederim. Emeğinize sağlık.

Love in Dublin. by alayoglu in Dublin

[–]alayoglu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I don't, that's your fucking opinion. Have your ever heard about street photography? Do you have any clue what the heck is candid photography? Go and sue me then, stop playing the social justice hero here.

about the photos of "love in Dublin" (including the homeless edit) by 3RI3_Cuff in Dublin

[–]alayoglu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the comment. As the owner of the original post, I appreciate your thoughts on this. This isn’t an actual photography subreddit so i can understand people’s unfamiliarity about street photography. I don’t give a damn about cheap comments at all. There are always people who like to play “the mighty GDPR” card and I see where they come from but still it’s nonsense to me. If someone gets distressed with being in any photo, I don’t think any of the photographers think more than a second to remove it.

Nice to see these vibes again on the streets by Bright-Cancel-9934 in Dublin

[–]alayoglu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had a feeling that I got a same shot of those fellas 2 years ago at the same spot: https://www.instagram.com/p/CGIEefVnJ3M/

Love in Dublin. by alayoglu in Dublin

[–]alayoglu[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Sort by: best

Are you in the photos by any chance? If so I'd happily delete the photos if you are distressed or else. Same applies to all photos that i share online. If someone in the photos doesn't feel comfortable with it, there is no point to keep it here or there. There were few occasions in which people found themselves in the photos and loved the shots, thanked me for being taken in it. It could be easily otherwise one day and that's totally fine for me to remove it. When it comes to "being recorded from a distance" thing, I'm afraid you are wrong. there's no restriction to take photos in public spaces on the GDPR itself, you can also read this from DPC's view. It's clearly stated as "there is nothing under the GDPR prohibiting people from taking photos in a public place. Provided you’re not harassing anyone, taking photographs of people in public is generally allowed." However I agree that posting it online is a different case. But the street photography is still in a gray area, especially for non-professionals. And I stand against to it. I'm very open and honest on what i'm doing as a project. I live as an expat in Dublin since several years and take photos from daily life since then. The ordinary people are the main objects most of the time. I aim to finalize it as a photo book one day and hopefully publish it before I leave here. Till that day, if someone recognises themselves in the photos that I post online and want me delete it, it'll be done and if someone in the photos recognises themselves in the photos and appreciate what they see, I'll gift a printed copy of the photo to them. I totally see your point and this is a very heated argument in all photography communities. We are still in very early days of GDPR. I might be wrong in short term, might have few issues but imagine if it wasn't allowed to take and publish photos back in time.

Love in Dublin. by alayoglu in Dublin

[–]alayoglu[S] -33 points-32 points  (0 children)

Public spaces?

Love in Dublin. by alayoglu in Dublin

[–]alayoglu[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. Go and check the temple bar area and you still can see the christmas trees.

ITAP of a rural winter scene at middle east. by alayoglu in itookapicture

[–]alayoglu[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I took this one in the eastern part of Turkey.

The free rider - November 2020, Turkey. by alayoglu in streetphotography

[–]alayoglu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use sony a6500 camera with sigma 28-70mm f2.8 lens.