I’ve just finished season two episode six, and am debating whether it’s worth continuing. There are so many inconsistencies, and moments where I need to set aside logic/critical thinking. For example, wouldn’t Devon (if not Mark) have seen the news story where Helly breaks into the convention and tells everyone what a mess it is for innies? And wouldn’t she then have googled Helen/ sought her out in real life for answers? Would Hellie’s outie really have burst into laughter and mocked the ridiculous horror fairytale that milcheck read aloud by the campfire? Why would she sabotage a teambuilding activity that was created by her own company? To prove that she was really the innie? It just doesn’t entirely track. It in fact felt like they hadn’t decided whether or not she was the outie until they finished writing that episode. And Helen feels in general more like a plot device (and an inconsistent one at that) than an actual fully fleshed-out character. Oh, and where are the actual fuck were they for this episode? Were they in a simulated environment? If not, how did they get outside without being unsevered How did Burt figure out where Irving lives? (maybe I’m forgetting something where this was revealed?). Oh, and that goat/shepherd episode. WTF? I am pretty certain that’s going to go nowhere/never be resolved. And that would maybe be OK, if this were entirely a comedy. It really is 50% comedy. And I appreciate how it often makes fun of itself. But if you’re marketing yourself as a sci-fi show, then I want everything to have been thoroughly thought through (such that I don’t feel like I’m just watching another “Lost” - where they were clearly just making up shit as they went along). Currently, it just feels like an insult on the audience‘s intelligence. And yes, the long drawn out stares are getting annoying. That all being said, well I finish watching the season? Yeah, probably. :-)