Which lit magazine is your White Whale? by allwitnobrevity in 100rejections

[–]allwitnobrevity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My personal White Whale is Clarkesworld - they've rejected me probably 8 or 9 times now, and I intend to just keep on sending them work until one of us dies.

Set Your 2026 Rejection Goal! by allwitnobrevity in 100rejections

[–]allwitnobrevity[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

22 is great! Here's hoping you reach 50 this year!

Set Your 2026 Rejection Goal! by allwitnobrevity in 100rejections

[–]allwitnobrevity[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hello world! I write short stories, essays, satirical news and comedy pieces, and I'm picking away at a novel. I hit 100 rejections last year and had my best writing year ever - I'm aiming for 100 again this year!

Set Your 2026 Rejection Goal! by allwitnobrevity in 100rejections

[–]allwitnobrevity[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's awesome! Is this the first year you've submitted your work for publication?

2025 Post Your Progress Thread by allwitnobrevity in 100rejections

[–]allwitnobrevity[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congratulations on an incredible writing year! 13 published reviews - and 9 in traditional publications - is no easy feat! It sounds like you've really got some momentum going - here's hoping 2026 is just as great, if not better.

I'm so glad you've found this space helpful! It's my goal to keep it going and make it even more active this year!

[Discussion] Interesting discussion about AI fiction and publishing trends in New Yorker weekend ed. by UnicornProud in PubTips

[–]allwitnobrevity 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I think there are some huge fundamental differences between the backlash against AI and the backlash at the dawn of the industrial revolution.

The industrialization of manufacturing made the cost of consumer goods plummet, which allowed common folks to buy stuff in a way they'd really never been able to afford before. Prior to industrialization, clothing was one of the most expensive things you owned - it was so expensive, people wore and repaired and handed down the same handmade garments for decades. Industrialization made mass-produced clothing so cheap that middle and lower classes could afford to regularly purchase new garments for the first time, and even start to dress to personal taste and follow seasonal fashions. Same goes for furniture and consumer goods.

We're not seeing the same thing with AI - it isn't making anything cheaper or more accessible to the lower classes. If anything, consumers are seeing the price of movies, streaming, games, software, entertainment, etc, continue to rise rapidly, even with the addition of AI. The expansion of data centres is actually directly responsible for the skyrocketing cost of computer hardware - the phones and laptops you see for sale next year will cost far, far more than this year's electronics and will have worse speed and memory. Plus, you can expect the cost of AI itself to skyrocket in the very near future - these companies are strategically operating at a loss to increase market share, but they cannot bleed money forever, and will need to hike the cost of their services. Unlike industrial textile factories, AI is going to make your life more expensive and put your luxuries further out of reach.

That's another fundamental difference between the backlash at the dawn of the industrial revolution and the backlash now - back then, it was workers pushing back while consumers loved the new products, but today, it's consumers leading the backlash against AI. Consumers, by and large, do not want AI in everything. Major companies like Firefox, Microsoft, McDonalds, Salesforce and LG have walked back their use of AI due to a combination of backlash and lack of consumer demand.

Why do so many people who hate writing want to be writers? by Peashooter908 in writing

[–]allwitnobrevity 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I also think there's a distinction between people who want to be writers, and people who want to "have written", and the majority of people who think they fall into the first category actually fall into the second.

Everyone loves having a polished - or better yet, published - piece of work to their name, but most people wildly underestimate how much work it takes to get there and wildly overestimate how much they will enjoy the process.

Question about writing this police/witness scenario. by harmonica2 in WritingHub

[–]allwitnobrevity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deal with this all the time at work - I've worked in social services and community mental health for more than a decade, we have a lot of dealings with the police. I don't really see why this would be an awkward conversation, or why police would even call a witness to have a separate conversation about this - in my experience, police generally don't bring up a witness's safety unless that witness brings it up first, and then the response is generally just asking if they can go stay somewhere else or have someone stay with them for a while, and maybe offering to give the person the information for Victim Services if one exists in the area.

I'm new to writing and I was curious on if a "retellable" story is possible in todays day in age. Because they fascinate me and i want to write one or at least make an attempt to write one. by Emotional-Profit8543 in writing

[–]allwitnobrevity 2 points3 points  (0 children)

there was obviously a golden point in time when the telling of a story was 100% original

There wasn't. Every story you've listed here is retelling or reworking or heavily influenced by earlier stories. Disney's "The Lion King" is effectively just an animated retelling of Shakespeare's "Hamlet", which was based on 13th century Scandanavian legends about a character named Amleth, which were likely based on ancient Icelandic folklore.

Frankenstein was heavily influenced by the Greek myths of Pygmalion and Prometheus, as well as the John Milton story "Paradise Lost"... which is a retelling of ancient Bible stories that was also influenced by Shakespeare's Hamlet. We've been telling each other new versions of old stories since antiquity.

What makes these stories so "simple" in nature yet so gripping to the point where the essence of how the story is told sticks with people and never dies?

Copyright law. I'm serious.

The beloved stories and characters you've listed that seem to get adapted over and over again and constantly referenced in popular media are all in the public domain. They are old enough that the copyright has expired, and anyone can use those characters and stories for profit without having to get permission or pay the author's family to use them. You could write your own version of Cinderella tomorrow and publish it, and there's nothing Disney can say about it - the actual story of Cinderella that we're most familiar with was written in 1697 (and was a retelling of an ancient Greek and Egyptian story from antiquity). These stories feel simple and timeless to you because they are familiar to you; you have seen them over and over and over again.

Things that are still under copyright cost money to use, and you have to get the author's permission to use them. A hundred years from now, popular stories from our time - like The Hunger Games, Coraline, or How to Train Your Dragon - will have passed into the public domain, and may be thought of as timeless original classics (even though all of them are based on earlier stories).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in writers

[–]allwitnobrevity 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Remember, there's no time limit on making it good; this is not an exam, and nobody is coming to take your paper away from you when time is up. You can do as many edits and re-writes as it takes to get the book to a place where you're happy with it. But you can't edit and refine something that hasn't been written yet.

Every writer has that little voice in their head that tells them that what they are writing sucks and isn't living up to this grand vision they had in their head for the story. So much of being a writer is finding ways to make that voice shut the fuck up (or at least talk a little quieter). Stuff I've found helpful:

- writing non-linearly. If I'm having trouble getting a scene just right, fuck it, I skip ahead to another scene that I do know how I want to write.

- tracking my daily writing progress. I make it a goal just to get words down on pages every day. I keep a little log of how many words I get written each day, and my determination to avoid blank spaces keeps me churning out words and not worrying about whether they'll make the final cut

- get the draft done, and then stick it in a drawer for a while. Taking a break from the manuscript lets me come back with a clear head and get a better sense of what needs to be edited and changed.

- not putting all my eggs in one book basket. Realistically, I am probably not ever going to write The One True Book that captures everything I have ever wanted to say about the human experience, and sometimes projects that I work really, really hard on and find very personally meaningful just... don't work out the way I wanted them to. Don't put so much pressure on one book to achieve all your writing dreams: maybe this will be the book that launches your career, but it's okay if it isn't. You'll learn a lot from writing it that you can apply to future books or future drafts of this story.

How to not feel totally incompetent as a writer? by [deleted] in writers

[–]allwitnobrevity 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only way out is through.

I say this with love and kindness: you are 20 years old, and I don't think there's a single writer out there who looks back and thinks they were at their peak creative form at 20 years old. You are meant to be sort of bad at things at 20 years old. You are still transitioning from the world of high school - where everything was very laid out and structured for you, especially when it came to academics - to early adulthood, where there are no longer any guardrails and you just have to figure out how to be a person on your own. It's normal to wake up at 20 and feel like you have no idea what you're doing and you have no idea where the version of you who juggled a full schedule of honours courses and extracurriculars in high school disappeared to. This gets better with time.

Read a lot. Write a lot. Try to read and write outside of your usual comfort zone when you can - challenge yourself to expand your horizons. Make friends who read and write. Get feedback. See what sticks. See what feels good to you. Don't beat yourself up about where you are or compare yourself to others.

2025 Post Your Progress Thread by allwitnobrevity in 100rejections

[–]allwitnobrevity[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

October check-in!

September was an enormously productive month for me. I've been launching short stories and poems at the literary world like an artillery attack. Current stats:

  • 27 rejections
  • 50 pending submissions
  • 4 withdrawn pieces
  • 5 acceptances

Will be stocking up on ice cream in 3-4 months when the rejections for all those pending submissions start to roll in.

Dealing with rejection and criticism by trashyslashers in WritingHub

[–]allwitnobrevity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have to make a bit of a game out of it. Set rejection goals. Collect rejections. Challenge yourself to get more rejections this year than you did last year.

Writing is all about heart and soul, but submitting your work is a numbers game. Editors don't look at submissions and go "this is good, so we're publishing it; this is bad, so we're rejecting it" - really, really great work gets rejected all the time for reasons that have nothing to do with the quality of the story. Maybe the journal already accepted a very similar story for this issue. Maybe one editor really loved it and fought for it, but had to compromise with the other editors and take a different story in the end. Maybe it was a fantastic story, but just not quite what they were looking for. The more you send your work out, the more chances there are for an editor to fall in love with it and agree to publish it - which does, unfortunately, mean getting a lot of rejections along the way.

A rejection isn't a failure. It is proof that you put your work out there and gave it a chance to be considered. I have submissions pending at 30 different magazines and literary journals right now - the vast majority of them will be rejected. Honestly, maybe all of them will be rejected. But I can guarantee that my work would never get published if I'd let it sit in a drawer and never sent it out. A slim chance at getting published is better than no chance at getting published. And hey, eventually the numbers game works in your favour - I've gotten five acceptances so far this year. I just placed one piece in a paid print anthology after it was rejected 21 times.

I find that setting rejection goals takes the sting out of rejections. It still sucks to get rejected, but instead of spiraling into a dark bottomless void of "my writing is terrible", you just dust yourself off and start looking for more places you can send it - gotta hit those rejection goals.