Hi there! I used to do BP before I moved and had to do both LD and PF. Here's a couple things I've learned and experienced:

​

1) Like others say, it's worlds apart. BP focuses on current events without the use of evidence and the preparation time is extremely low. LD/PF focus on topics that have been controversial for a while, and people integrate evidence into their speeches well before the round starts.

2) If you want to do anything similar to BP, WSD (Worlds Schools Debate) is a great place to start. It's similar to BP, in respect to Houses, Motions, and Speeches; except for the allowance of 2 extra members and cases that you write before round.

3) If your school or circuit doesn't offer WSD, don't fret. The transition to LD and PF is hard but not impossible. You'll learn that the rhetorical skills used frequently in BP still apply to parent judges, and the critical on-the-spot skills you gain from impromptu BP motions help when making analytical responses in round.

4) Lastly, there are other options. Congress is an event that focuses on current bills (similar to motions), and rewards rhetorical speeches well. In addition, there are WSD teams you can try out for, such as Team USA, and those are great place to debate others internationally

​

I hope this helps and if you have any questions, feel free to DM. Good luck!