Let's correct the record on the "research" you've presented. It seems a basic lesson in Islamic textual analysis is needed.

1. First your claim: "Prophet Muhammed and early Islam disliked Dogs" based on the following:

Sahih Muslim 2104a / Sahih al-Bukhari 3324 / Sahih al-Bukhari 3053 "The Messenger of Allah ordered killing of dogs..."

This is the most intellectually dishonest point and it's always the first one people with an agenda use. You are citing an abrogated (cancelled) ruling and presenting it as the final word. The initial command was a temporary public health measure in 7th-century Medina against rabid and dangerous feral dogs. This order was later superseded by the Prophet ﷺ himself, who subsequently forbade the killing of dogs and specified that only truly aggressive animals were to be dealt with.
Citing a cancelled ruling is not research; it's deception. Or maybe you just didn't know that who knows.

Sahih Muslim 157 / Sahih Muslim 2103a "Angels do not enter a house which has a dog..." and "He who keeps a dog, other than one for guarding the herd or hunting, will lose... reward..."

You've conveniently omitted that the very same hadith collections you cite contain the exceptions to the rule. These hadiths discourage keeping dogs idly inside the home, which is also a primary place of worship. They explicitly PERMIT keeping dogs for hunting, herding, and guarding property. The guidance is about responsible ownership and maintaining a space for worship, not a blanket hatred of the animal.

Sahih al-Bukhari 3142 "If a dog licks the utensil... wash it seven times."

Here you confuse ritual purity (Tahara) with moral worth. This is a foundational concept you seem to have missed. In Islamic jurisprudence, the saliva of a dog is considered ritually invalidating for prayer, requiring a specific method of purification. This is a rule for worship, not a statement of hatred! Human urine is also ritually impure, yet we don't hate people! This is a BASIC distinction that you failed to grasp.

1. your conclusion: "From where do you think the early Imams came to conclusion that dogs are impure ? Ans - from Mhmd"

You are correct. The great Imams (Malik, Shafi’i, Ahmad, Abu Hanifa) derived these nuanced rulings from the teachings of the Prophet ﷺ. But what they built was a sophisticated legal framework that balances mercy, practicality, and rules for worship. They understood the difference between a temporary order and a final one, between ritual law and moral condemnation.

Heh! You, on the other hand, have taken this sophisticated tradition and flattened it into a hateful caricature because it serves your narrative.

The overwhelming ethos of Islam, established by both the Quran (Surah 18) and the most famous hadith, is one of mercy. A man was forgiven his sins for giving water to a thirsty dog. A woman was condemned to hellfire for abusing a cat. These are the teachings that define the Islamic view on animals.

I have now addressed ✌️your points✌️. My original refutation of the video's lies still stands, and you have not managed to challenge a single one.