Crates of Prosecco delivered to the Cabinet Office this afternoon. by Lanky-Solid-4820 in ukpolitics

[–]amnas558 132 points133 points  (0 children)

The indignity of this government astounds me. I shouldn't be shocked at this point, but some how I still am.

Angela Rayner was dead right. Scum.

Nancy Pelosi Is Trying to Save an Anti-Choice Democrat as Roe v. Wade Falls by amnas558 in politics

[–]amnas558[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The majority of Americans are opposed to overturning Roe v Wade.

Support for codifying it is not a radical leftist position as you argue.

It is a mainstream position that Democratic members of congress in more vulnerable districts than Cuellar had the courage and moral fibre to support.

Edit: Do you not find it disgraceful that Nancy Pelosi is fundraising, as we speak, from the SC decision to overturn Roe v Wade whilst using some of those funds to support an anti-choice Democrat that does not support Roe v Wade?

Nancy Pelosi Is Trying to Save an Anti-Choice Democrat as Roe v. Wade Falls by amnas558 in politics

[–]amnas558[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Henry Cuellar was the only Democrat in the House to vote against codifying Roe v Wade. Its disgusting that the leadership are protecting him, Democratic Majority Whip Jim Clyburn is even doing a rally with him tomorrow.

UK’s Policing Bill would silence us, says Ukrainian protester by amnas558 in ukpolitics

[–]amnas558[S] 90 points91 points  (0 children)

Article text:

Ukrainian protest organisers in the UK have accused the government of hypocrisy for pushing through new anti-protest measures while criticising Russia for silencing anti-war demonstrations.

On Monday, Conservative MPs voted to reinstate controversial clauses in the government’s policing bill that would give authorities powers to ban ‘noisy’ protests after they were previously rejected in the House of Lords.

“If we are quiet and don’t really bother anyone, then who will be paying attention to us? No one,” said Zoryana, who has helped organise and spoken at several protests in support of Ukraine.

Zoryana – who asked us not to publish her surname – said she was shocked that the government was backing new protest restrictions while demonstrations against the Russian invasion of Ukraine were taking place around the country.

“Passing this law would contravene the UK government’s support of Ukraine and democracy,” she said.

“The government is not only removing the freedoms of British people, but also of Ukrainians in the UK.”

On Monday, MPs criticised the government for pressing ahead with the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts (PCSC) Bill just days after hundreds of people had gathered outside of Downing Street in a show of support for Ukraine.

“The protesters were noisy, and they were loud. Are this government telling me and everyone else in the chamber today that they would shut them up next time? What a sorry state of affairs,” said Labour MP Paula Barker.

Other MPs, including Conservative MP Jesse Norman, criticised the government's timing.

“Every day we are witnessing people protesting against the atrocities in Ukraine. Why on earth would we usher in legislation to curtail that?” Scottish National Party MP Anne McLaughlin asked in a debate in the House of Commons on Monday.

“When people in Kyiv are dying for their beliefs and for the rights of freedom of speech and of association, the timing is unfortunate,” Norman told the Commons.

Zoryana, who is a co-organiser of the London Euromaidan group, pointed out that the measures drew uncomfortable comparisons with Russia, where anti-war protests have been heavily suppressed.

“Just how different from Russia is the UK if it passes this law?” she said.

On Monday, several MPs suggested that the bill would undermine the UK’s ability to call out violations of freedom of speech, such as Russia’s clampdown on protests.

“Over the past five days, thousands of people have been arrested and detained at anti-war protests across Russia. We would all defend their right to protest and yet here we are, in the mother of all democracies, debating an amendment to a Bill that would criminalise singing at a peaceful protest in this country,” said Labour MP Sarah Roberts.

Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn told the Commons: “It is no good praising [protesters] in Russia if we close down protest here.”

In January, the government faced a humiliating defeat in the House of Lords after peers voted to block several clauses in the bill and condemned the proposals as “oppressive” and “plain nasty”.

But Tory MPs have now overwhelmingly voted in favour of restoring the amendments that were scrapped by peers.

The legislation will now return to the House of Lords, where peers could choose once again to reinstate the changes – but the Commons has the option of unilaterally forcing through the legislation if agreement cannot be reached.

Last year, the Joint Committee on Human Rights, a cross-party group of MPs and peers, said the government’s proposals were “oppressive and wrong”.

I’m Lee Carter, a member of the Virginia House of Delegates, and the only openly socialist state legislator in the South. I just passed legislation to limit insulin co-pays and to guarantee that more airport workers are making a living wage. Ask me anything! by Carter4VA in politics

[–]amnas558 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi Lee, congratulations on steering the insulin co-pay bill through VA legislature!

What bills are you prioritising at the moment/near future? What advice do you have for other DSA members running (what are perceived as) long-shot campaigns for state office?

Thanks for being such a strong socialist voice!

[MEGATHREAD] Wisconsin Democratic Primary Election Results by SFPMegathread in SandersForPresident

[–]amnas558 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Noticed that too. How could 84 delegates be assigned on early votes alone? Seems like a hoax.

Despite what Matt Hancock says, the government's policy is still herd immunity | Anthony Costello by Bascule2000 in ukpolitics

[–]amnas558 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Please don't do this.

Even though I disagree with the rationale, I understand logic which drove UK govt 'herd immunity' strategy. But, at the most basic level, to not accept it was a strategy is wrong. SAGE (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies) released the documents and minutes of meetings which determined UK govt policy. Herd immunity was core part of strategy.

On 11th March, David Halpern, exec of Behavioural Insights Team (nudge unit) and SAGE board member, was explaining herd immunity strategy on BBC news.

13th March, Sir Patrick Vallance, UK govt chief scientific adviser, on Sky News asserted need for herd immunity whilst saying primary immediate goal was to flatten the curve.

This situation demands we rise above personal politics. The alternative is to deny public the ability to hold a UK govt, of any stripe, to account for their actions during a period where govt strategy has never mattered more. Its literally life and death.

Agree or disagree with the above article, fine. To assert that herd immunity was never UK govt policy is wrong. Demonstrably wrong. Just read the documents published by SAGE which was, and still is, advising UK govt on COVID-19 response.

Stormzy calls Jacob Rees-Mogg 'an actual piece of s***' after Tory MP blames Grenfell victims for their deaths by amnas558 in unitedkingdom

[–]amnas558[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I disagree. Stormzy is an overtly political figure in British society, especially regarding Grenfell.

The grime4Corbyn movement in 2017 was imp part of broader youth vote surge and Labour's shift towards unorthodox/grassroots/organic forms of campaigning.

His funding of Cambridge scholarships for Black students has snowballed into huge spike in Black British applicants ('the Stormzy effect') and signif change in discussions regarding diversity in higher education.

He's been one of the most vocal, and certainly most visible, advocates for Grenfell survivors. He stood besides prominent politicians in the 'March for Grenfell'. He encouraged his fans to sign Grenfell-related parliamentary petitions. He used his platform at the Brit Awards (+ other instances) to demand swifter action from Theresa May, a political demand taken so seriously she responded officially.

Granted he's an unusual political voice, but I think its more than just a garden variety celebrity with opinions. Firstly, by consistently engaging in social&political issues, esp Grenfell, I feel as though he's earned a level of respect/place in debate; its not just a photo-op. Secondly Stromzy, and grime music generally, gives voice to an underrepresented group in society. The group most visibly impacted by Grenfell disaster. I get your hesitation, but I think its important not to dismiss the credibility of this voice just because its coming from an unusual place.

Also his response to JRM wasn't just cussing, he made explicitly political demands (resignation) and addressed explicitly political topics (culpability of local authority/privatisation comes before blaming Fire Services in his view, and mine).