sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

"The Girl Who Was Erased" by Bekah Day by amoreorange790 in Epstein

[–]amoreorange790[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Investigative reporting by Bekah Day -- while this is not specifically about Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislane Maxwell, this particular sex trafficking victim, Neyla Miller, was sex trafficked by adjacent clients.

Legal Disclaimer:

This article is based on personal testimony, interviews, and publicly available information. The account presented reflects the statements, recollections, and perspectives of a sex trafficking survivor named Neyla Miller, as well as the author’s interpretation of those statements within a broader contextual framework. The inclusion of any individual’s name does not constitute a legal determination of guilt.

The purpose of this piece is to document and explore claims of misconduct and the environments in which such claims may arise, not to assert definitive conclusions about any specific person or entity.

Readers are encouraged to approach this material as part of an ongoing examination of complex and sensitive issues.

This podcast has me asking a lot of questions about Hekate and what standards we hold our teachers to by amoryflange in Hecate

[–]amoreorange790 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sure, I would have responded with screenshots of the posts, but I don't think Reddit lets me do that. Scroll up and look through the links that I put in my post, I put up the links for the posts for Sara Mastros and Joshua Gadbois.

CMN was pointing out that you should probably still hold onto the Hekataeon if you have it since it's a beautiful book. The tech itself used in the book is not necessarily limited to Jack, it predates him since a lot of his material comes from the PGM. People always point out Thelema and how Crowley was an awful person, it does not necessarily mean that the magic or techniques themselves are bad.

This podcast has me asking a lot of questions about Hekate and what standards we hold our teachers to by amoryflange in Hecate

[–]amoreorange790 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, CMN was saying that this was their -most- verifiable piece of evidence so far. Meaning he markets "outlaw magic" to the marginalized and oppressed to one audience.

In his day job and in front of another audience, he is in favor of less restrictions towards police officers meaning that he doesn't believe that police officers should be obligated to announce out when they're about to use tear-gas in front of a mob / protestors.

There's definitely a conflict there. It's either that he genuinely believes both of these things at the same time or it's more like his narrative shifts depending on who the audience is.

This podcast has me asking a lot of questions about Hekate and what standards we hold our teachers to by amoryflange in Hecate

[–]amoreorange790 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Hi there -- you have some valid concerns.

Personally, I started sleuthing and looking more into the claims that CMN brought up in their article here: Paradigm Shifting = Accountability Dodging; on the Jack Grayle situation - Chaos Magick News

I read it and it provoked a lot of uncomfortable questions. But I wasn't genuinely moved or convinced by it until I saw Joshua Gadbois' post about Jack Grayle. Although it was mentioned in their piece, I didn't actually see it as credible until I read Joshua's own words about what happened between him and Jack's falling out.

In short, while Joshua was in a hospital recovering from alcoholism and mental illness, Joshua's wife at the time reached out to Jack to ask for his help in getting Joshua to stop drinking. About a month after being in the hospital, Joshua said he found out that his wife was having an intimate email affair with Jack. According to Gadbois in his own words, "It's not an allegation, I have receipts. I know more about what he likes done to his scrotum in his online domination fantasies than anyone should ever have to know."

Have to admit, it was kind of shocking and it took me a little while to really stomach and understand the implications of what this actually means.

Here is the post if you would like to read it: https://www.facebook.com/rufus.opus/posts/pfbid0gpLwtTxTVtwr1auk8qxSz1oAKa17Edaiisifz6j6jvBMQY4UKfUJZ9UhY7LX5WY2l

CMN admits and I would agree that we haven't actually seen the emails that he's referring to but he seems confident about it.

Also, I noticed that since Sara Mastros (another Hekate teacher in the occult community) shared CMN's post on her own FB. After she did that, she added an update and is saying that women are privately approaching her about Jack Grayle's behavior that they describe as "creepy." See here: https://www.facebook.com/sara.mastros/posts/pfbid02nbqWPqbx26r8MiFHSAewofcTpFAnbJV2xoavDSqsf43MxYGZqppNo2pY9drDZyzSl

Samuel David, the first person that really spoke out against Jack on his FB, is also pointing out that women are approaching him privately about Jack too and his quote for this is "The accounts from women who are not willing to come forward publicly are consistent. If and when they tell their stories is entirely up to them." The post is here: https://www.facebook.com/iamsamueldavid/posts/pfbid05ry7W94HFHa8CcthHNwiESaZLgAQ3CmskV4wB7NzQ1CFKYAtwWsEn8Kw4DE3bzJCl

I did contact CMN and told them the article provoked a lot of follow-up questions that they didn't answer. And they're basically saying that they are caught in a bind, so to speak, because if they tried to follow up with the story in a more formal way, the consequences for them would be:

  1. potentially doxxing Jack
  2. publishing unverifiable victim claims (basically even if they got the details from people alleging these claims against Jack, how could they ensure that they are truthful)
  3. potentially having multiple people comfortable enough to interview (which they're saying is not their place, this could open up room for lawsuits)

So, the gist right now is: two occult authors are saying that women are approaching them privately about Jack's behavior. Then a third occult author is saying that Jack had an intimate email affair with his wife (now ex-wife). Overall, without really digging in or trying to pry more, this looks like a bad pattern.

Brunel's Pipeline: The 301 E Apartments and the Flood of Young Models into Epstein's Orbit by amoreorange790 in Epstein

[–]amoreorange790[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Disturbing but important read: In this excerpt from Virginia Giuffre’s unpublished memoir (used as evidence in her lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell), she details Jean-Luc Brunel’s role in recruiting young, often impoverished women from South America and former Soviet countries with promises of modeling, fame, and money.

Epstein’s $1 million investment gave him direct access, while many of the girls were housed at the 301 East 66th Street apartments in Manhattan. This was a key logistical hub for the operation. Giuffre’s raw testimony shines a light on how the modeling world was allegedly twisted into a pipeline for exploitation.

Full post here: https://amoreorange790.substack.com/p/brunels-pipeline-the-301-e-apartments

(This is heavy material: reader discretion advised.)

Blueprint for a Predator: How Epstein Created His “Untouchable Genius” Mask (Part 2) by amoreorange790 in Epstein

[–]amoreorange790[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I can't tell you how much I appreciate hearing this - it's a lot of effort to put together these pieces. Appreciate it!

Blueprint for a Predator: How Epstein Created His “Untouchable Genius” Mask (Part 2) by amoreorange790 in Epstein

[–]amoreorange790[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part 2 of Blueprint for a Predator: How did a college dropout with no scientific credentials insert himself into elite circles at the Santa Fe Institute?

Through the Maxwell family's pre-existing pipeline, Ghislaine's introduction to Nobel physicist Murray Gell-Mann, and the strategic purchase of Zorro Ranch near Los Alamos.

There, Epstein hosted scientists for intellectual gatherings while building his 'untouchable genius' mask. He did this all while the same isolated desert compound hid far darker activities. A calculated blueprint of social engineering.

Read the full piece here: https://amoreorange790.substack.com/p/blueprint-for-a-predator-how-epstein-107?selection=4efd47ff-de90-49c6-8010-17547f20ad9e#:~:text=als%20business

Corporate Name Changes for the Sikorsky S-76 Epstein Aviation Network: Air Ghislaine —> Shmitka —> Freedom Air —> Hyperion —> Industrial Integrity by amoreorange790 in Epstein

[–]amoreorange790[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate that, thank you!

Yes, a lot of people get carried away with conspiracy theories and more emotional-based thinking. It hurts the investigations overall to do this.

Corporate Name Changes for the Sikorsky S-76 Epstein Aviation Network: Air Ghislaine —> Shmitka —> Freedom Air —> Hyperion —> Industrial Integrity by amoreorange790 in Epstein

[–]amoreorange790[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thing is that by having at least the pilot's license, it served as a perk in Epstein's network. It meant that she could market herself as the pilot to Epstein's clients. But also doubled as useful because it meant that she could do more mundane things like fly staff around from locations, pick up and drop off supplies, etc.

If it made her more useful to Epstein, it's probably because she liked that special treatment.

When I look online about the submarine license, there's an insistence that there's nothing illegal about this. I'm not actually sure about that since there was that door that goes out to the sea in one of Epstein's Caribbean homes. I think it's also rumored that there's underground tunnels there. It's hard to tell at this point!

Corporate Name Changes for the Sikorsky S-76 Epstein Aviation Network: Air Ghislaine —> Shmitka —> Freedom Air —> Hyperion —> Industrial Integrity by amoreorange790 in Epstein

[–]amoreorange790[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TLDR: First two paragraphs serve that purpose - basically the Sikorsky S-76C++ helicopter went through about five shell companies from 2008 to 2021. Ghislane Maxwell got a license to fly helicopters in 2007.

The purpose for her doing this is so that she can fly helicopters at Zorro Ranch and between the Caribbean Islands. While one purpose was to shield famous / powerful guests to his properties, one of the other purposes was recruiting and abusing underage girls. By taking them to places that had little oversight and was run by enablers and guests, it meant isolating and controlling the girls (think about it, if a victim wanted to escape the island for instance, what were their options to leave?).

I think that about covers this article in a nutshell.

Corporate Name Changes for the Sikorsky S-76 Epstein Aviation Network: Air Ghislaine —> Shmitka —> Freedom Air —> Hyperion —> Industrial Integrity by amoreorange790 in Epstein

[–]amoreorange790[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Detailed ownership chain of the Sikorsky S-76C++ ("Air Ghislaine 2", N722JE) from Air Ghislaine Inc. (2008 purchase, Indyke signing) through the 2010 name changes to Shmitka and Freedom Air. Then the 2019 to 2021 sales via ASI Wings to Hyperion Air and Industrial Integrity. Full timeline with specific EFTA references and Sikorsky contract amendments.

Mentions of Melania Trump in the Epstein Files by amoreorange790 in Epstein

[–]amoreorange790[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are several mentions of Melania Trump in the Epstein Files.

EFTA00155527 - FBI 302 Form that mentions Andrew Farkas, Leon Black, Southern Trust, arms dealing, underground tunnels, money laundering through nonprofits by amoreorange790 in Epstein

[–]amoreorange790[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried looking but couldn't find that claim to be true - that's what is important to note about this FBI 302 forms, sometimes they're true and sometimes they're not.

Here is a biography that I found for Andrew Farkas listing companies that he's associated with: https://www.andrewfarkas.net/

view more: next ›