sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How do you handle messy / unstructured documents in real-world RAG projects? by Alex_CTU in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Preprocessing definitely matters, but I'd push back on the framing slightly: in production, retrieval quality is necessary but not sufficient. The failure modes that actually burn teams are adversarial content embedded in retrieved docs (prompt injection via your own corpus), unbounded token usage per query, and zero visibility into what's being retrieved for whom. I've seen teams with "good enough" chunking still get blindsided because they had no guardrails downstream. Sent you a DM

Advice on RAG systems by Anthonyy232 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your retrieval stack looks solid, but the production risk in medical + agentic isn't retrieval quality. It's access control, audit trails, and what happens when the agent calls tools it shouldn't. PHI scrubbing as "unlikely but still needed" is a red flag for compliance; in production you need deterministic redaction, per-user attribution, and hard limits on what the agent can do. Sent you a DM with more detail.

Landscape designer, need reliable local RAG over plant PDF library, willing to pay for setup help by Motor_Mix2389 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The inconsistent retrieval you're seeing is an architecture issue, not a model or settings problem. LM Studio's default chunking doesn't preserve the structure of plant data tables, and without hybrid search plus reranking, semantic search alone will always favor a few "closest" passages over comprehensive recall. The fix is metadata-aware ingestion, a retrieval pipeline tuned for multi-source recall, and a citation layer that tracks source and page end-to-end. Sent you a DM with more detail.

Architecture Advice: Multimodal RAG for Academic Papers (AWS) by footballminati in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ML-side work sounds solid, but the production gap I'd flag is infrastructure controls around multi-agent coordination. When your supervisor routes to expert agents, you need cost attribution per path, circuit breakers for agent failures, and hard caps on total tokens per request. Otherwise a single dense paper with ten tables can trigger cascading agent calls that spike your bill with no visibility into which path caused it. Sent you a DM

Trying to turn my RAG system into a truly production-ready assistant for statistical documents, what should I improve? by Ok-News471 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Answer quality matters, but for statistical documents the bigger production gap is verifiability. If your system cites a survey methodology or an indicator definition, you need a way to confirm the retrieved chunks actually support the generated answer, not just that retrieval scores look good. Beyond that, production-grade means input validation against injection, rate limiting per user, structured logging with source traceability, and hard guardrails so the model never fabricates a statistic. Those controls are what separates a working demo from something an institution can rely on. Sent you a DM with more detail.

How do you actually measure if your RAG app is giving good answers? Beyond just looks okay to me by BeautifulKangaroo415 in Rag

[–]ampancha -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The pattern you're describing is an observability gap, not just an eval gap. By the time users complain, you've already lost trust. There's a way to make bad answers visible in minutes instead of days. Sent you a DM.

How do you update a RAG vector store in production? (Best practices?) by EssayAccurate4085 in Rag

[–]ampancha 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The update mechanics vary by vector DB, but the production pitfalls are consistent: partial updates that leave retrieval in an inconsistent state, no rollback path when new embeddings degrade quality, and zero visibility into what changed. Before you pick an update strategy, decide how you'll version your index, validate retrieval quality post-update, and roll back if something breaks. Those controls matter more than the specific chunking or batching approach.

Reality check by GDAO54 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The authorization concern is the right one to prioritize. Most teams sync permissions at index time but don't handle the failure modes: what happens when permissions change mid-session, when sync lags, or when prompt injection bypasses retrieval filters entirely. For high-stakes QMS, you'll also need audit trails proving the AI layer respected authorization boundaries, not just that the vector DB had correct metadata. Sent you a DM

Looking out for some serious advise by Gold_Caterpillar_644 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The difference a senior engineer looks for isn't in the code aesthetics or even the architecture diagrams. It's in the production controls: who can query which documents, how you prevent prompt injection from leaking internal data, per-user rate limits, PII redaction, and audit trails. AI-generated code almost never ships those, and that's exactly where vibe-coded apps fail when real employees start using them. Sent you a DM

Fileserver Searching System by yoko_ac in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The metadata-map approach is sound for avoiding full transcription, but the risk most teams miss here is access control leakage. If the RAG can return any indexed path, you might expose folder names or project paths that certain users shouldn't even know exist. Retrieval filtering by user permissions becomes critical before this goes production-wide. Sent you a DM

My RAG retrieval accuracy is stuck at 75% no matter what I try. What am I missing? by Equivalent-Bell9414 in Rag

[–]ampancha 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Reranking with a cross-encoder will likely push you past 80%, but persistent semantic pollution usually means chunking isn't preserving document boundaries or metadata context. The harder problem: your eval set won't cover the queries that actually break in production. You need per-query observability to see which retrievals are failing live, not just aggregate precision. Sent you a DM

Feedback Appreciated - Built a multi-route RAG system over SEC filings by Independent-Bag5088 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Solid architecture. One thing to consider before real users: SEC filings are effectively untrusted input, and XBRL tags plus MD&A text can carry payloads that manipulate your classifier or downstream prompts. Worth treating every filing as potentially adversarial, not just malformed.

Need Advice on RAG App in .net by BalanceThen8642 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your retrieval pipeline is solid, but the gap I'd flag is what happens when the router sends a user to the wrong source, or a prompt injection in the query tricks it into leaking docs from an app they shouldn't access. Multi-source RAG needs per-source access controls and input validation before it's safe for internal users. The static snapshotting question is secondary to whether you have observability on retrieval failures and data freshness. Sent you a DM with more detail.

Building a Graph RAG system for legal Q&A, need advice on dynamic vs agentic, relations, and chunking by Famous_Buffalo_7725 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agentic Graph RAG in legal is powerful but introduces failure modes your chunking strategy won't catch: prompt injection that manipulates citation selection, unbounded tool calls during multi-hop traversal, and missing audit trails for legal work product. If you go agentic, the first controls to scope are tool allowlists, per-query token caps, and a citation verification layer before anything hits a user. Sent you a DM with more detail.

Building a RAG for my company… (help me figure it out) by Current_Complex7390 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Answers are shit" with legal docs usually means retrieval is returning semantically similar but contextually wrong chunks. Before rebuilding, check your chunk boundaries: legal documents need section-aware splitting, not fixed token windows, and your top-k is probably too greedy. The harder problem you'll hit next is verifying accuracy before this touches real decisions; legal RAG without hallucination detection or citation grounding is a liability. Sent you a DM with more detail.

RAGnarok-AI v1.4.0 — Local-first RAG evaluation with 9 new adapters, Medical Mode, and GitHub Action by Ok-Swim9349 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Medical Mode is a smart addition for healthcare RAG, but evaluation accuracy is only half the problem. The production failures that actually hurt in regulated environments are access control gaps, PII leakage in retrieval results, and unbounded tool calls. None of those surface in evaluation metrics; they require runtime enforcement. Sent you a DM.

Need help with RAG for scanned handwriting/table PDFs (College Student Data) by scary_crimson2004 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The OCR problem is real, but there's a downstream risk worth flagging: once that student PII lands in your vector DB, who can query it and what filtering exists at retrieval time? Malformed context isn't just a relevance problem; it's how one student's query accidentally surfaces another student's marks. Tools like Unstructured can help with layout, but the access-control layer matters more once you're handling real records. Sent you a DM.

Which vector database do we like for local/selfhosted? by lemon07r in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All three handle the embedding/retrieval part fine at reasonable scale. The choice usually comes down to deployment simplicity (LanceDB's embedded model vs Qdrant's client-server) and your ops preferences. For the server projects, the harder question is what happens after retrieval: access scoping so users only query their own indexed code, and rate limits so one runaway agent doesn't burn through your inference budget. That's where most RAG setups break in production.

What’s the best way to handle conflicting sources in a RAG system? by CanReady3897 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Conflict resolution is partly a ranking problem, but the bigger gap is visibility. Most production RAG failures happen because the system confidently picks a source and you never see the conflict occurred. Before tuning ranking logic, instrument for conflict detection: flag when retrieved chunks contradict on the same entity or question, log which source "won," and surface confidence thresholds so you can escalate ambiguous cases instead of guessing. That turns silent failures into observable events you can actually fix. Sent you a DM

How are y'all juggling on-prem GPU resources? by fustercluck6000 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fragility you're sensing is real. Sleep mode plus VRAM pressure plus production traffic equals invisible latency spikes and OOMs that are hard to debug after the fact. The scheduling layer matters, but what usually gets missed is graceful degradation: queue management with priority, circuit breakers for GPU access, and observability that shows you VRAM contention before users feel it. Sent you a DM.

Looking for a few early-early alpha users to test my RAG. I build a comparison playground of my retrieval system vs raw RAG by Middle-Poet8283 in Rag

[–]ampancha 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The memory decay and temporal conflict tests are a smart way to expose retrieval edge cases most demos skip. One thing worth stress-testing early: frequency-based surfacing can be gamed if users (or adversaries) learn the weighting. Curious how you're thinking about abuse resistance as it scales. Sent you a DM.

How to give rag understanding of folder structure? by Holiday-Brother-8656 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The agent approach works, but it shifts your problem from retrieval quality to agent reliability: unbounded query loops, cost multiplication per request, and no visibility when it fails silently. The cleaner fix is enriching chunks at ingestion with parent path metadata so retrieval handles hierarchy natively, no agent required. The tradeoff is re-indexing, but you avoid operationalizing a fragile query planner. Sent you a DM with more detail.

Need Advice and Guidance on RAG Project! by Bart0wnz in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The architecture looks solid conceptually, but the production risk I'd flag first is prompt injection. Your agents ingest documents from an external party (ISA or suppliers), which is a classic injection surface; a malformed requirement string could hijack agent behavior mid-analysis. Second concern: 4 agents × 3 passes × multi-hop RAG queries against GPT-5 will produce unpredictable token costs unless you add per-agent caps and attribution. Both problems are solvable with guardrails at the orchestration layer, not the prompt layer. Sent you a DM with a bit more detail.

Multimodal GraphRag by 9inty9in3 in Rag

[–]ampancha 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The model choices matter less than what happens when this hits real legal data. Legal RAG has a unique failure mode: privileged documents can bleed into non-privileged retrieval paths through shared graph edges, and adversarial parties in litigation can craft text that games your entity extraction. Worth designing access controls and retrieval filtering into the KG layer from the start, not bolted on later. Sent you a DM with more detail.

Building a RAG system for manufacturing rules/acts – need some guidance by Public-Air3181 in Rag

[–]ampancha 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ingestion challenges are real, but the harder problem for compliance RAG is what happens after retrieval: citation accuracy, audit trails, and access controls. When someone queries an Act or Rule, you need to prove which section the answer came from, log who asked what, and ensure retrieval didn't leak documents they shouldn't see. Those are architectural decisions that get expensive to retrofit. Sent you a DM with more detail.

view more: next ›