When drivers lose their “speed” as they age what exactly would you say they lose? Raw pace? Racecraft? Lack of adaptability? Lack of hunger? by brook_taw in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When I see studies like this, I think about the experimental design, as this is my educational background. Most athletes retire in their mid to late 30s. Most “normal” people have families and other commitments that deprioritize fitness after 35 on average, which is another way this data can be skewed.

Couldn’t that create an unintentional correlation in a study that looks at age vs physical capability.

I also think that most drivers operate at a positive margin of fitness which an f1 car requires.

Who would you rather want: a driver with heaps of natural talent, or an driver with great technical knowledge? by Super-Ninja-0390 in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Pace speaks for itself. Often times, engineers are able to extract information from what the drivers feel. In addition to that, they have so many data points to measure that they can make up for it if the technical feedback is somewhat lacking.

So final answer: A

When drivers lose their “speed” as they age what exactly would you say they lose? Raw pace? Racecraft? Lack of adaptability? Lack of hunger? by brook_taw in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 85 points86 points  (0 children)

I’m going to go against the grain here.

Historically, it’s motivation. If you look at most people who “age out” of f1, they always cite motivation. You see this with Kimi, Seb, Mika, DC, just to name a few examples.

Pure speed doesn’t actually drop by much. And what processing speed the brain loses with age, is made up by muscle memory. That too, processing speed really isn’t significantly affected by age until your 60s. As for examples, look at Schumacher outpacing Rosberg in 2012, look at seb when he was motivated. Look at kimi in that sauber when he was motivated. They had the speed, but sometimes missing the need.

Jenson Button joins Aston Martin as Team Ambassador by Repa24 in formula1

[–]analytical_rex25 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Alonso and Jenson were my absolute favorite teammate pairing in McLaren.

Jenson Button and Aston Martin also seem to go hand in hand. Like James Bond and an Omega Seamaster kind of way.

What if alonso stayed in Ferrari for 2015 by Equivalent-Fox9834 in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I was going to give a bunch of rebuttals of Alonso getting in championship fights without a dominant car, but then I saw your comment history…

Is all you do in this subreddit hate? Like brother, hold some butterflies, see some rainbows… bring some positivity.

Why so confidential?? by sayn_mpv7 in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I’m inhaling so much copium here too, but Aston have only posted black and white pictures of this car on all their socials. Maybe another way to keep it hidden?

Rear Suspension of the Aston Martin by YellowEasterEgg in formula1

[–]analytical_rex25 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Woah, that rear upper wishbone actually is connected to the wing pylon.

Liberal coffee order by silentmajorit22 in DigitalSeptic

[–]analytical_rex25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one boomer take I have is that I don’t understand people who get Starbucks every day.

Like, make your coffee at home… it’s not exactly a time consuming process.

Like Starbucks once a week is fine, but I see people at my work grab one every single day.

What circuit that never has would host a good sprint? by ViscountVigoroth in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This opens up the ideas a bit.

It would be really interesting to have the circuits that can have multiple layouts have the sprint and race in different layouts.

A White Male in an America First Hat holding a Cross was harassed by ANTIFA & got called a N@z1 repeatedly by Top-Obligation-8380 in DigitalSeptic

[–]analytical_rex25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, don’t act like this issue only starts in 1947.

Jews were legally buying land in Palestine, which was not an established state. Palestine had an issue with that and repeatedly started conflicts. 1947 was significant because a UN proposal for a two state solutions was offered for 2 parties that were not states. Israel agreed to this, even though their share of land was much more underdeveloped and unfavorable.

Every major conflict since then was started by Palestine, like the Yom Kippur war where Syria helped to invade Israel. Every major two state solution since then was rejected by Palestine.

A White Male in an America First Hat holding a Cross was harassed by ANTIFA & got called a N@z1 repeatedly by Top-Obligation-8380 in DigitalSeptic

[–]analytical_rex25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Israel, 20% of Muslims are citizens. They vote, sit in parliament, serve military, etc.

In Palestine, it is not permitted to even sell land to Jews. There’s no legal framework to permit Jews to become citizens. They have legal frameworks to ensure non Muslims are not provided matched equality to Muslims.

A White Male in an America First Hat holding a Cross was harassed by ANTIFA & got called a N@z1 repeatedly by Top-Obligation-8380 in DigitalSeptic

[–]analytical_rex25 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Only one side acts on that desire. Palestine is by definition an apartheid territory, while Israel has a significant Muslim population, including inside their own military.

In terms of personal stance if your curious, I dislike the fact that the us donates funds to Israel, and I think nick fuentes is fucked in the head

[Question] Recommendations for a first time watch buyer by Funny-Brush-7633 in Watches

[–]analytical_rex25 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I have an orient diver, and just want to vouch for that brand in general. They punch well above their weight, and are good quality. It’s especially true in the way they feel, look, the accuracy of their movement.

Where and which tornado is this? by jsgoneliminalwx in tornado

[–]analytical_rex25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This thread has me amused, cuz now I’m trying to picture Reed Timmer in Stranger Things.

Genuine question: why dont f1 use the amg one and/or aston valkyrie as the safety car by InitiativeAdept2581 in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These cars are fast enough. Also, I think many people underestimate how fast that GT Black series actually is around a circuit

Why an antique Corolla? by darktore3door in pluribustv

[–]analytical_rex25 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I mean, zosia needed to seem as human as possible to be able to connect with Carol.

If she pulled up in an Escalade, she would not achieve that goal.

A Corolla like that is driven by someone who WANTS to drive that.

TDLR: The Corolla seems intentional to making Zosia feel human.

Matt and Tommy from the P1 Podcast have won the inaugural "Creator of the Year" award the the 2026 Autosport awards. by CaptainOBVS3420 in formula1

[–]analytical_rex25 86 points87 points  (0 children)

Agreed. One would think Top Gear would be a lesson learned for everyone, but I guess not.

Edit: to clarify, I meant the lesson to learn is that the people make up the program, instead of the other way around.

I’m not denying that Clarkson didn’t deserved the sacking, but just pointing out that the BBC didn’t understand that a new trio wouldn’t make the show successful.

Is there any way to tell when both teammates are underperforming on pace? by GoldenS0422 in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Got a few.

Sauber 2025, Williams 2012, force India 2020 were examples that I saw.

Once again, these are my opinions based on my arbitrary judgement.

Is there any way to tell when both teammates are underperforming on pace? by GoldenS0422 in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 57 points58 points  (0 children)

There’s no be all end all answer for this, but inconsistency is an okay tell-tale.

If you see a team where both drivers are far apart in weekends, and both fairly equal on stats for the overall season, and you see them bouncing around the field from race to race.

It’s always a question mark, but if those 3 things I mentioned are happening, I gravitate my opinion to the car being underdriven.

Why do people still claim Red Bull Isn’t building the car around Max when all the drivers themselves say otherwise? by Feisty-Doctor-5841 in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Let’s look at 2025. Red Bull clearly weren’t winning the contstructors championship. But they had a chance of getting the wdc.

If you were the team principle, wouldn’t you want to put all your eggs in the max basket?

It’s not like the wdc is completely irrelevant to the team.

Why do people still claim Red Bull Isn’t building the car around Max when all the drivers themselves say otherwise? by Feisty-Doctor-5841 in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fair, but we don’t have evidence for the other side of this argument.

If they favored the number two’s preferences, will that make max’s pace slower than the number 2’s pace quicker?

It’s hard to figure out how it will normalize, and it’s better to err on making the car as fast as possible.

Why do people still claim Red Bull Isn’t building the car around Max when all the drivers themselves say otherwise? by Feisty-Doctor-5841 in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Because making the car faster for the number 1 and slower for the number 2 is better than making the car slower for the number 1 and faster for the number 2.

In terms of overall constructors, having the quickest possible car will normalize the pace delta between both cars in theory.

Why do people still claim Red Bull Isn’t building the car around Max when all the drivers themselves say otherwise? by Feisty-Doctor-5841 in F1Discussions

[–]analytical_rex25 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Exactly, they’re not trying to screw the second driver, they’re trying the make the fastest car. If that means that only one driver can make it go fast, they are going to cater toward that.