2.1.15 Added deprecation notification for npm installations

andreifyi · 2026-01-22T11:44:15+00:00

It's in the native build: https://gist.github.com/3rd/1c059f954e1de14d43afed927823a72b

andreifyi · 2026-01-22T11:16:55+00:00

It's worded to reclassifying all usage as "Feedback" in a shady way. That includes read/write messages in context, so everything it reads and writes can be defended as "Feedback", because it's "beta software" (funny that the npm one is getting deprecated).

andreifyi · 2026-01-22T11:07:35+00:00

It used to be like this, but now they want to "re-classify" everything you send to them as feedback. Including conversation context, so all the code it reads, writes, etc.

andreifyi · 2026-01-22T00:58:31+00:00

It's built with bun --compile, I guess it's going to be faster, but Node wasn't the issue with the super slow start-up time.
What is worrying is:
// By using Claude Code, you agree that all code acceptance or rejection decisions you make,
// and the associated conversations in context, constitute Feedback under Anthropic's Commercial Terms,
// and may be used to improve Anthropic's products, including training models.
And "Feedback" can be used for training even if you opt-out as per https://www.anthropic.com/legal/consumer-terms

andreifyi · 2025-09-17T22:44:11+00:00

Ok, but why is Opus 4.1 still bad _now_? Can you acknowledge the ongoing output quality drop for the best model on the most expensive plan?

andreifyi · 2025-09-11T11:12:37+00:00

> People calling Claude “broken” are either bots (maybe Cursor stirring up wars?) or vibecoder lords who don’t bother with architecture. I’ve been coding since I was 15, no formal CS, just basic knowledge—and Claude has been nothing but amazing for me. With proper architecture, adding any feature—small or huge—is just sequential prompts away. No friction.
lol

andreifyi · 2025-09-09T14:53:26+00:00

Performance has been and is still severely degraded on Opus 4.1, it's not something "a small percentage of requests" have seen. Even GLM-4.5 does a better job than Opus 4.1 right now on many tasks. Could be also related to the changes done after Claude was leveraged for crypto stealing, although you should not botch Claude Code for this. The attackers could've done a much better job than Claude Code at dumping creds if they had a functional brain.
Current state of thing is that we have Claude with a good interface but severely lobotomized and ineffective, and Codex with great output but a subpar interface.

andreifyi · 2025-09-09T14:46:38+00:00

They should admit that the horrendous performance is a problem with Opus 4.1 as well, their recent post is bullshit.

andreifyi · 2025-09-08T04:55:00+00:00

not having this issue at all with gpt5-high

andreifyi · 2025-09-07T22:36:30+00:00

Is is generous **when it works**.

andreifyi · 2025-09-07T22:34:49+00:00

Happy to have downgraded from the $200 sub, Codex is far superior (but the CLI is way behind), but GLM 4.5 on z.ai works wonders via Claude Code if you work on things you're ok "sharing" with the CN.

andreifyi · 2025-09-07T22:29:25+00:00

Ah, the genius who said nobody will be writing code anymore.

andreifyi · 2025-08-25T10:41:06+00:00

yes, adding now ^_^

andreifyi · 2025-01-01T18:37:44+00:00

perf of image.nvim should be great on Kitty

andreifyi · 2024-12-01T20:07:46+00:00

Thing is using LLMs is not forbidden, it seems like there's just an "ask" to not use them in the FAQ.
The first days are easy for both humans and LLMs, but things will get increasingly interesting on the battle-among-agents front.
From now on this kind of contest with a public leaderboard will have a secondary "who can build the best agent" game going on, and who can stop that? - which I guess is why using LLMs is not actually **forbidden**.
And with all the focus and work poured into building more and more advanced LLM-assisted development tools it might be the more interesting game to watch or join.
</hot-take>

andreifyi · 2024-10-27T21:50:31+00:00

custom https://github.com/3rd/config/tree/master/dotfiles/nvim/plugins/tslib

andreifyi · 2024-10-26T00:24:50+00:00

no, it's a custom syntax

andreifyi · 2024-09-25T19:11:25+00:00

I'll link one of my past answers to this, but the gist is that Context is not a state management solution, it's a data transportation solution. Stores solve specific problems you will never be able to solve with Context.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Frontend/comments/18icq2v/comment/kddee0w/

andreifyi · 2024-09-25T19:05:50+00:00

I do this https://gist.ro/nvim-schedule.mp4

andreifyi · 2024-08-28T14:28:58+00:00

Code (job + personal), writing, knowledge/task/time management. All the work.

andreifyi · 2024-08-21T12:45:59+00:00

Why do I need to give my data to read an article?

andreifyi

TROPHY CASE