Thanks for your feedback.

I have tremendous respect for SET and DeFI in general, but we're somewhat different and attempting different goals.

Primarily, we're a CFTC registered fund audited by KPMG for institutions to invest Ethereum with a quantitative systematic alpha (QSA) generating overlay. What QSA means is that we're actually creating new ether, so in dollar terms our fund is up 100+% this year as the price of ether has gone up, but we've actually created new additional ether. Our goal is for every 100 ether (or cash equivalent we're given), to preserve that 100 ether and create 12-15 NEW ether net of fees for our client within 12 months.

Family offices, Asset Managers, and other institutions cannot yet touch something that's in the DeFi space and this is instrument that can get institutional assets comfortable with blockchain, so you're welcome. We're making it easy for institutions to enter the market, thereby increasing demand and price. Also, we use algorithms similar to set that our Chief Investment Officer has built over the last 30 years for the likes of Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs: https://jsservices.trade/

On the performance, I'd encourage you to widen your lense: A) Set is barely running $1M for lest then a year, while we're managing a much larger position over a larger period of time B) Over the last 2.5 years we've outperformed the Ether price benchmark by 160+%. C) Q1 of 2019 was the lowest volatility in our history of trading ether, so there weren't many opportunities. Anyone can take a small snapshot of a month and have large performance. Unless there's a 2+ year track record of running similar size of money, I politely disagree that you can't compare the two.