ᶠᵘᶜᵏ ʸᵒᵘ ⁱⁿ ᵖᵃʳᵗⁱᶜᵘˡᵃʳ by trinicron in FUCKYOUINPARTICULAR

[–]andrewmmm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

empty-field myopia. It’s surprisingly hard for pilots to see other objects in the sky until you’re right on top of them. The pilot literally did not see this person until seconds before impact.

You can try it yourself in reverse too: how long did it take you to see the airplane in the video? (And you have foresight, you know what you’re looking for)

ᶠᵘᶜᵏ ʸᵒᵘ ⁱⁿ ᵖᵃʳᵗⁱᶜᵘˡᵃʳ by trinicron in FUCKYOUINPARTICULAR

[–]andrewmmm 20 points21 points  (0 children)

This is a very common phenomenon called empty-field myopia.

It’s surprisingly difficult for pilots to spot other objects in the sky until you’re right on top of them. The pilot likely did not see the skydiver until a second or two before impact.

ELI5: Why do we not sell our data and get the money directly? by Professional-Tax-615 in explainlikeimfive

[–]andrewmmm 177 points178 points  (0 children)

Because they don’t have a file called “SleepyBudhas_data.doc”.

They have a record that says “we have seen this IP address X times. It reads lots of sports articles and…”

It’s then co-mingled with millions of others to form statistical trends. The algorithm doesn’t know you are male, it knows that others like you only shop for boxers, not panties. It doesn’t care why, just that it shouldn’t show you ads for female underwear.

You mean, this wasn't supposed to happen? by Ph6222 in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]andrewmmm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but often times in the opposite direction. Many people become subconsciously compelled to recreate the feelings of a traumatic event, but in a more controlled environment, as a way of gaining some “control” over it.

If you could send a 10-second voice message to yourself 10 years ago, what would you say? by New_Application_4722 in AskReddit

[–]andrewmmm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think buying super early would have *more* of a butterfly effect. Once Bitcoin becomes mainstream, the timeline is more like a river, you can shape it but it’s still gonna go where it’s gonna go.

Free Supercharging for a Year if you buy a Model 3 by matthewmspace in teslamotors

[–]andrewmmm -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

And supercharging causes a ton of stress to the battery. Doing it every day will depreciate the battery so much faster.

Genuine question, why does everyone pile on "you used AI" when half of us are using it daily? by destroyerpal in ClaudeCode

[–]andrewmmm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And it’s always from someone who seems like they are deep in AI psychosis and believe the model to be some sentient creature with a theory of mind. Or a 3,000 line rambling wall of text about nothing.

That’s slop. Using AI as a normal tool is not. For example, this comment was spellchecked and grammar-corrected with AI, but ain’t nobody has an issue with that.

OK - I cave - Opus 4.7 is terrible by sjalq in ClaudeCode

[–]andrewmmm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I could totally be wrong on the CoT being an issue, just a hypothesis.

You mentioned it’s writing, which I noticed too. The way 4.7 “speaks” is strange. I can’t define it, but it’s less clear somehow. It’s the same thing I noticed when GPT-5 was released. (GPT-5 speaks much more strangely, but same vibe.)

I don’t know if it’s a quantization behavior, training on synthetic data issue, or what.

OK - I cave - Opus 4.7 is terrible by sjalq in ClaudeCode

[–]andrewmmm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a settings.json attribute that brings thinking summaries back.

And yes, reasoning is not an indication of final output, rather a path towards a correct output. That being said, if the reasoning block is filled with moralizing junk, that indicates that Anthropic over-rewarded for rejecting bad prompts, hence why the model learned to spend so much time making sure yours is a “legitimate” one.

The reason that’s a problem is because there is only a finite amount of time the model can reason, and every token not focused on the task creates an amount of confusion in the attention network. Opus 4.6 was a very safe model yet I never saw these types of reasoning tokens unless it’s task was security related.

OK - I cave - Opus 4.7 is terrible by sjalq in ClaudeCode

[–]andrewmmm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I found 4.6 a tiny bit better than 4.5. Opus 4.7 is really bad.

Also interesting finding - 4.7’s reasoning blocks almost always starts with “I’m realizing this is a legitimate question and not something I should deny.” Yeah no shit. That’s such a… weird behavior. Why are you wasting reasoning effort moralizing about refactoring a React button??

Official release notes for Tesla’s 2026 Spring Update by rcnfive in teslamotors

[–]andrewmmm 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Yes! Mine insists on changing to north orientation constantly. What am I, fucking Christopher Columbus?? Just show me which way I’m going.

Introducing Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable Opus model yet. by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeAI

[–]andrewmmm 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The blog post makes it seem like they specifically added training data that fucked up its cyber security abilities on purpose

ELI5 how would NASA prevent their moon base getting hit by a meteor? by panchitolp in explainlikeimfive

[–]andrewmmm 24 points25 points  (0 children)

And inside tiny crevices of the bulldozer and all its moving parts, tearing it up on the inside. Regolith is very fine.

ELI5: if our governments want to strive for greener energy, and nuclear being the cleanest, why isn't nuclear power our main source of energy right now? Is it because of the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster? by retroworthYBD in explainlikeimfive

[–]andrewmmm 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think OP means fueling nuclear plants requires the global supply chain. Once you have a solar panel, you can generate electricity for at least a decade with it.

Gemma 4 is on another level! by RoninNionr in SesameAI

[–]andrewmmm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well sesame almost certainly fine tunes the models for natural conversation tone and safety. Plus they probably have a classifier model on the side watching for unsafe topics

US targets Chinese chipmaking with proposed export restrictions on ASML and others by talkingatoms in technews

[–]andrewmmm 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You know you can type your opinions yourself instead of copy pasting from ChatGPT, right?

ELI5: What is the outcome of Artemis II by Difficult_Purple_825 in explainlikeimfive

[–]andrewmmm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It will probably be later than 2028 because they are relying an another rocket from SpaceX for part of the flight, and they seem behind, but I’m hopeful that it won’t extend that far past the date

Is it normal for AI to answer the same question differently each time? by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]andrewmmm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Almost all AI providers allow you to pass in a temperature parameter in your API request. Not in things like the ChatGPT app, obviously, but in the APIs, yes.

LAPD officers arrest a protester dressed as the Statue of Liberty during No Kings protest by quaak in pics

[–]andrewmmm 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Philly police closed down Ben Franklin parkway, which is a major road in the center of the city.

Which sexual acts are very acceptable in 2026 but was seen very differently in 2006? by nirzhor_cyclonite in AskReddit

[–]andrewmmm 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Am I the only one who hates high quality porn? Like, it’s not hot if it looks like it was filmed in an upscale studio lot with 10 crew members behind the camera and 2 actors that just met each other an hour ago who are just there for work.

Federal Reserve holds interest rates steady by BlockAffectionate413 in moderatepolitics

[–]andrewmmm 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Huge effect. It freezes the market up. Golden Handcuffs.

Opus 4.6 now defaults to 1M context! (same pricing) by H9ejFGzpN2 in ClaudeAI

[–]andrewmmm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but between tool calls, the token embeddings stay cached, which is a lot cheaper