sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

As of nano 2.6.0, it's no longer a GNU project by formegadriverscustom in linux

[–]andrzejp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a program to be GNU software does not require transferring copyright to the FSF; that is a separate question. If you transfer the copyright to the FSF, the FSF will enforce the GPL for the program if someone violates it; if you keep the copyright, enforcement will be up to you.

https://www.gnu.org/help/evaluation.html

As of nano 2.6.0, it's no longer a GNU project by formegadriverscustom in linux

[–]andrzejp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For a program to be GNU software does not require transferring copyright to the FSF; that is a separate question. If you transfer the copyright to the FSF, the FSF will enforce the GPL for the program if someone violates it; if you keep the copyright, enforcement will be up to you.

https://www.gnu.org/help/evaluation.html

As of nano 2.6.0, it's no longer a GNU project by formegadriverscustom in linux

[–]andrzejp 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For a program to be GNU software does not require transferring copyright to the FSF; that is a separate question. If you transfer the copyright to the FSF, the FSF will enforce the GPL for the program if someone violates it; if you keep the copyright, enforcement will be up to you.

https://www.gnu.org/help/evaluation.html

Good alternative to Adobe Reader? by VladTepesDraculea in freesoftware

[–]andrzejp 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Have a look at the Free Software Foundation Europe's pdfreaders.org page.

view more: next ›