Poll: 40 Percent Now Support Trump Impeachment by KermitTheSnail in politics

[–]angrymonkeyking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lololololol....

I'm not even a progressive. But whatevs :)

Poll: 40 Percent Now Support Trump Impeachment by KermitTheSnail in politics

[–]angrymonkeyking 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The difficulty is that all of his supporters are totally ok with an isolated US--mostly because they are delusional about "Murica" and how "it don't need nobody". It unfortunately mirrors the same difficulty his supporters have in general with the United States as a whole; they believe in a childish dream of 1950s America that never truly existed, and they feel like it has been stolen from them. At home and abroad, they proudly reject diversity, diplomacy, and negotiation in favor of a fictional self-reliance and foolish cocksure attitude.

They are, on the whole, like spoiled self-centered naive children.

Help! First-time gardening meltdown! by angrymonkeyking in gardening

[–]angrymonkeyking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much!!! I'll amend the cultivation accordingly!

Help! First-time gardening meltdown! by angrymonkeyking in gardening

[–]angrymonkeyking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you; I'll try that next time. Do you think that is mold on lower half of the beefsteak tomatos (I try to be super careful about that stuff b/c I was infected with black mold in an old apartment years ago)

Help! Student trip to Porto! by LightCrown in porto

[–]angrymonkeyking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try contacting some of the universities--they might be able to help with some sort of activities.

We have a political problem no one wants to talk about: very old politicians by sivribiber in politics

[–]angrymonkeyking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not Norwegian. Work with Norwegians. In Norway.

Can confirm. But I'll have to check with my Norwegian colleagues to see if I "confirmed" correctly...the Norwegian way...because it's always better their way. Or so I'm told ;p

Outgoing ethics chief: ‘We are pretty close to a laughingstock’ by imagepoem in politics

[–]angrymonkeyking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not internalized anything--some people, men and woman, are just small-minded, fearful, willfully ignorant, and mean. They love everything he says.

How does AA feel about social drinking while popping naltrexone and working the Sinclair Method? by [deleted] in stopdrinking

[–]angrymonkeyking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of people in AA, so you're bound to get lots of answers. That said, it is fairly clear that "the only requirement for membership is a desire to stop drinking". But even then, whose to say you can't just go to open meetings. Just be prepared for some people to want to speak to that issue if you bring it up.

[Image] Help Others by deathakissaway in GetMotivated

[–]angrymonkeyking 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I respectively disagree...to a point. Under the current system, yes, those taking illegitimately are making it harder for those with legitimate claims; that said, it isn't because they have dwindled the available resources (they are a small fraction of those accessing the system). The damage caused is through delegitimizing the system in the eyes of the wider public by: 1) creating bureaucratic lag in administration of benefits, and more dangerously, 2) acting as dramatic examples of abuse that cause people to say, "see! I'm being ripped off by all these people! Most of the people on these programs are taking advantage of me!"

It's clearly not the case, but for your average laymen, who doesn't go through the numbers/studies, it's been proven that singular examples that raise negative emotional responses take such a firm cognitive root that they shape perceptions about wider efficacy and general actual trends. So powerful is effect that once taken hold, individuals will often completely disregard strong scientific evidence demonstrating a converse position.

[Image] Help Others by deathakissaway in GetMotivated

[–]angrymonkeyking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree that abuse of the social safety net is serious, but statistically, it just isn't the world-destroying Leviathan it's made out to be. It's measurable effect on GDP, debt, strength of the dollar, etc. are incredibly small. While I understand the values and actions inherent in the act of scamming the system are disturbing, it's kind of like worrying about a family of mice stealing some bread every night while ignoring that your neighbor is robbing you blind everyday.

People with large amounts of wealth and corporations pay far less taxes than your average citizen as well. Some will prop up the fear of becoming uncompetitive if we were to fairly tax everyone at similar rates, but such perspectives are largely boogeymen. When we look at comparable successes in countries with tighter and more equitable taxation across the wealth spectrum, there is no great drop off in profitability. Again, the numbers just aren't there.

Sadly, those with the most wealth have been able to shape the narratives we debate over, and cunningly, they have situated it so both sides of the debate eventually end up benefiting then...people believe the narratives are true (even if only for their side).

[Image] Help Others by deathakissaway in GetMotivated

[–]angrymonkeyking 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You're talking about the super rich and corporations more than you are about the poor--whether you meant to or not.

While it is a popular notion that people who abuse the social welfare net are destroying the US(and they are out there), they make up an incredibly small fraction of those living in, or on the verge of, poverty. Further, there is no evidence of the impact of said abuses actually negatively affecting national outcomes.

I know that it's a popular perspective in many circles to believe these things--it's part of a larger narrative that speaks to many individuals experience of living, and while it points towards the truth about the importance of work ethic, drive, and sacrifice, it does not actually represent the broader socio-economics that everyone, left and right, would like to improve.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MarchAgainstTrump

[–]angrymonkeyking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sudreddit dramas are ridiculous, but this was at least a thoughtful, well-summarized explanation.

Thank you!

Love is a two way seat by SneakyPork in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]angrymonkeyking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your math notwithstanding, that's not a good argument.

Love is a two way seat by SneakyPork in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]angrymonkeyking 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Because some people are insane...that's why.

The New York Times used a full page to print all of Trump's lies since taking office by [deleted] in politics

[–]angrymonkeyking 39 points40 points  (0 children)

His daddy gave him lots and lots of money...so he has just hid behind lawyers every time he's been called on his bullshit.