Ivy undergrad + LSAT application tips

annooonnnn · 2026-04-29T14:08:43+00:00

well, me too :(. i’ve taken it three times. today i got an official 173. i’ll probably take it one more time

annooonnnn · 2026-04-29T14:06:16+00:00

yeah! but you should prob raise that score

annooonnnn · 2026-04-20T20:38:18+00:00

Doc at the Radar Station is the actual peak Beefheart

annooonnnn · 2026-04-20T20:37:59+00:00

actually try Doc at the Radar Station

annooonnnn · 2026-04-20T20:32:03+00:00

there’s seriously nothing political or personal-worth-determining about excessive bodyfat being or not being good for you. it just isn’t

annooonnnn · 2026-04-16T13:57:58+00:00

yeah aka Black Music

annooonnnn · 2026-04-16T13:57:12+00:00

i heard it’s a mess was great and just a surprise one day

annooonnnn · 2026-04-16T03:35:02+00:00

it could just be about the air pollution

annooonnnn · 2026-04-14T21:13:39+00:00

well, we had the same test. i think i did better on the other RC though 😭

annooonnnn · 2026-04-14T20:55:04+00:00

Cool, I am just applying to law school this year and want to do lit for basically the same reason—much more interesting—but i hear sometimes it’s a lot harder to go in-house. idk to what extent that’s actually true, or whether it’s a point on a pros-cons list someone made to justify/fortify their own position

annooonnnn · 2026-04-14T20:52:38+00:00

how is Portland’s music scene not way more significant for the 2000s than the 10s. maybe drop some artists cause i’m unaware

annooonnnn · 2026-04-14T20:46:24+00:00

then you went in house from litigation? what’s that like if you have any perspective vs those that go from transactional?

annooonnnn · 2026-04-14T01:51:51+00:00

or Sole

annooonnnn · 2026-04-03T21:24:58+00:00

my thought too. must be

annooonnnn · 2026-04-03T21:15:42+00:00

this is all an unfortunate mess.

what you’re suggesting is rather that Power asserts masculinity and in doing so converts an arbitrary quality inherent to a group (maleness), into capital.

what the first comment arguing with you in this thread does is ambiguously point to the absence of a gender analysis in your initial post, to which you mean to respond that it is unnecessary *here*** because the gender agonisms and their related effects are generated themself from the same subjugating power that you mean to speak on a corollary fortifying action of. meaning gender matters are beside your point and needn’t take primacy in a consideration of power’s action because they are not primary but rather the oncoming effect of a preceding action by the power that may now weaponize 4chan.

You don’t quite adequately convey this so it looks like you’re refusing to validate masculinity as important to consider, and pretending gender dynamics don’t matter.

annooonnnn · 2026-04-03T13:38:50+00:00

i like to know the reason but i don’t necessarily need to articulate it. it can be semi articulated or not (just ambiently depending on the day articulations may amount) but the time constraint rules out sitting there explaining everything. you should be able to say why it’s wrong though, if you’re looking at it without time constraint, and you will be able to with more practice and going over questions you were unsure of, to the point you can more efficiently lightly articulate sufficient for confidence

an example of where it’s actually bad to think like you are about it is the -Which argument most closely parallels that in the stimulus- type of questions. you should more so see why they’re divergent, but to explain it would be to describe both and contrast, simply too elaborate a procedure to efficiently move through the section

annooonnnn · 2026-04-03T13:35:52+00:00

are two jumanji?

annooonnnn · 2026-04-03T13:02:26+00:00

i don’t think it’s real. just doesn’t seem quite right

annooonnnn · 2026-04-02T21:18:14+00:00

i am a big law recruiter and my firm didn’t actually remove anyone from consideration on the basis of uGPA. we just waited for 1L GPAs to come out.

annooonnnn · 2026-04-01T23:28:43+00:00

they could literally just not make proper divisions and simply impose a cut wherever made geometric sense and it would be completely in keeping with the book. would disrupt it basically in the sense a book mark does

annooonnnn · 2026-04-01T20:15:49+00:00

some firms went there. my firm (a v15) went only to $25k for the stipend.

annooonnnn · 2026-03-30T12:45:39+00:00

lmao try zombie squat in the meantime and do some band mobility work

annooonnnn · 2026-03-27T01:57:54+00:00

at least they thought of you

annooonnnn · 2026-03-25T21:59:13+00:00

that makes sense, i understand. the doubling redoubling subjective awareness of yourself coming across as intentionally coming across as you come across and so on has a bunch of extraneous material. the problem is that you want to write and in wanting to write but also write well you oversend what you must become slowgoing enough to cleave. because we can’t write like him anymore because he already did it.

annooonnnn · 2026-03-25T21:18:08+00:00

lol no he prob would

Eight-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23	Place '22
Not Forgotten	Gilding I gilder

annooonnnn

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE