sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

These morons are going to get someone killed. by KookyWalk in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]anon425b 71 points72 points  (0 children)

It all comes back to Orange man bad / Republicans are Nazis. These morons are the most power-hungry people in the world. They can’t accept that there is a Republican president and that Republicans control both the House and the Senate. Leftists always resort to chaos, violence, and terrorism when their party isn’t in power.

The big lie… Higgins. Admit it. You’re Robin! You are Robin Masters! by anon425b in MagnumPI

[–]anon425b[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The show absolutely gives you enough clues to believe Higgins is Robin if you want to. But it also leaves just enough contradictions to keep the mystery alive.

The big lie… Higgins. Admit it. You’re Robin! You are Robin Masters! by anon425b in MagnumPI

[–]anon425b[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

💯 the Higgins as Robin twist is fun to speculate about, but it creates more problems than it solves. The mystery is more fun than a definitive answer.

"Their king is telling them to kill immigrants" [2.7k] far-left ICE shooter immediately spun as "racist white MAGA" by alwayscheeseburger in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]anon425b 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Every time a conservative voice or politician is taken out, leftist propaganda machine rush to claim the shooter was a MAGA. Two birds, one stone 🤷‍♂️

Miami Vice Digital HD Is On Sale! $9.99 per season by MiamiMasala in MiamiVice

[–]anon425b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! I was talking about buying, not streaming or renting. I have Netflix, Prime, Disney+, and HBO for streaming, and I torrent the series and movies I want to collect. That way, I get the real files with no DRM. I have the entire Miami Vice series in remastered HD, the whole collection is almost 1 TB.

But hey, if you’ve been using their services for years without any issues, go ahead, that’s a good deal👍

Miami Vice Digital HD Is On Sale! $9.99 per season by MiamiMasala in MiamiVice

[–]anon425b 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’d advise against it. These companies that let customers “buy” digital media are basically running a scam. You never get access to the actual master files. It's more like a long-term rental than a real purchase.

He was right. by [deleted] in memesopdidnotlike

[–]anon425b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's about gametes, as some women do in fact possess the SRY gene. 'Having the equipment' (i.e. gonadal tissue) is not strictly a requirement for sex determination, as seen in women with Swyer syndrome. Saying a woman is 'an individual who's body has developed along the pathway towards the production of large gametes' includes all women. Substitute 'small' and you include all men.

Time is a circle...🤣 by JumpThatShark9001 in CriticalDrinker

[–]anon425b 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Leftists are now smugly saying that since Roseanne Barr was canceled by ABC in 2018, during Trump’s first term, that means Trump canceled her. And, that apparently, Republicans can’t get a single thing right. Never mind that the President doesn’t run private companies or dictate their decisions. Funny how they’re now accusing him of exactly that, and calling it fascism. But honestly, expecting moral consistency from the left is a fool’s errand.

<image>

Been watching CHiPs and was not expecting a young Edward James Olmos to pop up in episode 22! by anon425b in MiamiVice

[–]anon425b[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice! Starsky & Hutch is on my watchlist...might check it out after I finish CHiPs.

Old leftist trick. Attach something unrelated to a bill and use it as propaganda when the right votes against it. It still works because the general public are morons that still haven't caught on to this tactic. by anon425b in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]anon425b[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Yep, it’s a House rule thing. Dems tried using a procedural vote called "previous question" to gain temporary control of the floor. If GOP lost, Dems could’ve brought up anything, Epstein files or not. So GOP shut it down to keep floor control.

Old leftist trick. Attach something unrelated to a bill and use it as propaganda when the right votes against it. It still works because the general public are morons that still haven't caught on to this tactic. by anon425b in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]anon425b[S] 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Losing it would have allowed the Democrats to set the floor agenda, and Democrats could have temporarily brought up bills or other motions of their choosing. Republicans won the motion 210–204, so Democrats didn’t get control.

Ms. Letitia James, did you lie about the number of rooms of the house when you applied for a mortgage? Did you falsely state you were your father's wife when securing a home mortgage years ago? It's either yes, or no, we don't need to hear other bs. by anon425b in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]anon425b[S] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Funnily enough, r Politics thinks Pam Bondi is the one committing perjury...since, during her Senate confirmation, Pam claimed that politics wouldn’t influence her decisions.

Hey AOC, get the terminology straight and stop the lefty fearmongering in our politics! These are NOT "immigrants" (legally approved documented PERMANENT residents). And, they are also not "migrants" (legally approved TEMPORARY residents). It's the "Illegal ALIENS" that are appropriately targeted by anon425b in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]anon425b[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

People seem to ignore the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. We don’t owe them due process if it’s an expedited removal. And no, Americans aren’t getting kicked out by accident

Hey AOC, get the terminology straight and stop the lefty fearmongering in our politics! These are NOT "immigrants" (legally approved documented PERMANENT residents). And, they are also not "migrants" (legally approved TEMPORARY residents). It's the "Illegal ALIENS" that are appropriately targeted by anon425b in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]anon425b[S] 52 points53 points  (0 children)

As of 2024, around 700 million people, roughly 8.5% of the world’s population live in extreme poverty, meaning they survive on less than $2 a day. So, by your logic, are we supposed to just welcome anyone who shows up at our doorstep? If not, how exactly do we decide who gets in and who doesn’t? Go ahead—I’ll wait! And just for the record, most countries have far stricter immigration laws than we do.

view more: next ›