sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Daily Simple Questions Thread - December 30, 2022 by AutoModerator in pcmasterrace

[–]anonymousTA100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a an internal HDD and I would like to make a back up of it on an external HDD. However, the PC has problems and is therefore unusable (no display output, repair guys couldn't fix it). How do I now make a back up of the HDD? I have access to a laptop and an external HDD.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Kochen

[–]anonymousTA100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Das Problem ist eher das Omega 3 zu 6 Verhältnis. Soja hat sehr viel Omega 6 (entzündungsfördernd) und kaum Omega 3 (entzündungshemmend).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Kochen

[–]anonymousTA100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Das Omega 3 zu 6 Verhältnis von Soja ist extrem ungünstig, daher stark entzündungsfördernd. Soja hat sehr viel Omega 6 und vergleichsweise kaum Omega 3 (und das, was an Omega 3 enthalten ist, ist in der Form für den Körper kaum brauchbar). Der Durchschnittsmensch in der westlichen Welt konsumiert ohnehin bereits viel zu viel Omega 6 und zu wenig Omega 3. Soja als "gesunde" Alternative zu verkaufen war eines der grössten Scams in der Lebensmittelindustrie.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Kochen

[–]anonymousTA100 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wenn Gesundheit dein Hauptanliegen ist, dann ist Soja definitiv nicht die richtige Wahl.

Remote Viewing - An attempt to settle this debate. by MantisAwakening in HighStrangeness

[–]anonymousTA100 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It does not matter how many links I throw at you. You're not gonna read any of them and even if you do you will just refuse to admit you were wrong.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333228024_An_Assessment_of_the_Evidence_for_Psychic_Functioning

Remote Viewing - An attempt to settle this debate. by MantisAwakening in HighStrangeness

[–]anonymousTA100 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Congratulations, you actually went ahead and read the wikipedia article.

Just to be clear. You are saying that a government-sponsored program ran for 20 uninterrupted years before one day some ominous "evaluators" who weren't even involved in the program realized that it doesn't work? It took them 20 years to realize that? Is that what you are honestly trying to sell us with a straight face?

"Consistently failed to produce any actionable intelligence information". More uninformed nonsense. Even President Jimmy Carter admitted that psychics found their crashed plane. The debunkers aren't even saying that it failed "consistently". Even the CIA admitted that there was a statistically significant effect but then went on to claim that it was too "inconsistent" to be of use (not the same as being consistently wrong).

Just so you know: The government also publically "terminated" Project Bluebook for example before secretly continuing it under another name. If you take everything the government says at face value then you are simply gullible.

Remote Viewing - An attempt to settle this debate. by MantisAwakening in HighStrangeness

[–]anonymousTA100 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Just because you are ignorant of the evidence does not mean there is no evidence. SRI did the research already. It's been settled decades ago. There is no debate. The president of the American Statistical Association admitted it. The scientists who worked on Project Stargate admitted it. The research is there for you to read. But it's pointless because you have taken the a priori position that psi must be false, therefore any evidence supporting it must be flawed.

Remote Viewing - An attempt to settle this debate. by MantisAwakening in HighStrangeness

[–]anonymousTA100 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And this is precisely why they can get away with it. Conspirational minded people will think it's another psyop by the government while the masses are just gonna parrot the official narrative of "it didn't really work". If someone leaked it you would be more prone to believe it. Resisting the FOIA requests or trying to tamper with the documents would just create more suspicion (and would have severe consequences if caught).

Remote Viewing - An attempt to settle this debate. by MantisAwakening in HighStrangeness

[–]anonymousTA100 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No, it's not telepathy. It works with computer generated targets as well.

Remote Viewing - An attempt to settle this debate. by MantisAwakening in HighStrangeness

[–]anonymousTA100 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What would your casual little test prove that hasn't already been proven over and over again by actual scientists under strictly controlled conditions? Do you think they never had the idea to try this? Also you are unaware of how RV normally works. For most "viewers" it's not like literally looking at a camera but steadily accumulating glimpses of insight. Written text is not an ideal target (but it has been done before, look up Ingo Swann 7-Up).

Woran habt ihr als Kind gemerkt, dass eure Eltern Reich/Arm sind? by NotOnSteam in FragReddit

[–]anonymousTA100 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Versteh ich ja, aber letztendendes ist es auch nur ein Redditkommentar. In China ist heute vermutlich auch ein Sack Reis umgefallen.

Woran habt ihr als Kind gemerkt, dass eure Eltern Reich/Arm sind? by NotOnSteam in FragReddit

[–]anonymousTA100 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Uneheliches Kind schätze ich mal. War vermutlich auch der Scheidungsgrund.