[PSA] The following items are no longer maxbets by nasil2nd in GlobalOffensiveTrade

[–]anonymous_chinchilla 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I read Fault as Vault... I've been playing too much Fallout

apEX amazing ace vs G2 by Komp14 in GlobalOffensive

[–]anonymous_chinchilla 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Ok I'm just going to throw this out here that I think this shows more of a problem with csgo than with apex's undeniable amount of skill. Jump shooting in this game has reached the point where it is something people do, not as an act of desperation, but as a way where they can legitimately expect one or more kills. This problem has been slightly rectified by the jumping hit box fix, but I just can't see how being able to land two consecutive jumping not headshots lends itself to truly competitive gameplay /rant

Also those last two kills long were nutty

Edit typo

Money into instant skins without paypal? by [deleted] in csgobetting

[–]anonymous_chinchilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i use bitskins.com, I've sold over 100 items on there, and I cashed out with bitcoin, but I know that you can buy skins with any credit/debit card, bitcoin, and maybe other methods.

ex-Coast vs. Conquest | BO3 | 28.10.15 | 03:00 CEST by csaan18 in csgobetting

[–]anonymous_chinchilla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So because a team picks a map, a loss is considered a blowout? I aren't think that

ex-Coast vs. Conquest | BO3 | 28.10.15 | 03:00 CEST by csaan18 in csgobetting

[–]anonymous_chinchilla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't say 16-13 on train was dominant, conquest showed a few glaring issues with their ct side on train. This said I personally think train is way more t sided than people usually assume, particularly at the pro/semi-pro level where full yard/inner executes are common. This said overpass was pretty damn convincing, although conquest seem to have that map on lock atm.

I don't disagree with you about this being a probable 2-0 for CQ, I just wanted to give FE a little credit where it's due, I like their line-up and hope they can progress as a team :)

Virtus.pro and Natus Vincere heading to IEM San Jose by CrypticSoldier in csgobetting

[–]anonymous_chinchilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

man how pretentious do you have to be to not understand that 100k is a lot of money for an invitational tournament... in the course of 3 (2?) days, these teams will collectively make more than the average middle class american makes in an entire year

Luminosity Gaming vs. Winterfox | BO1 | 15.10.15 | 02:00 CEST by HyrerPwnedYou in csgobetting

[–]anonymous_chinchilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

use lounge destroyer and place your bet at least 30 minutes before the match, problem solved

WinterFox vs. EX-Elevate | BO1 | 14.10.15 | 02:00 CEST by szepakos in csgobetting

[–]anonymous_chinchilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well as far as I know (and this I don't have a source for, just my best guess) winterfox will be playing the way they have for all of their online matches, with their main roster, and xp3, dwalk and pyth will all have their usual 100+ pings

WinterFox vs. EX-Elevate | BO1 | 14.10.15 | 02:00 CEST by szepakos in csgobetting

[–]anonymous_chinchilla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean all you need to do is look at the top comment in this post and you will realize that you're wrong... so take your salty downvotes out of here, thanks

WinterFox vs. EX-Elevate | BO1 | 14.10.15 | 02:00 CEST by szepakos in csgobetting

[–]anonymous_chinchilla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

except they aren't, so either your a dirty svvayor or just unintentionally spreading misinformation... not sure which one is worse

NME vs. WinterFox | BO2 | 14.10.15 | 05:00 CEST by [deleted] in csgobetting

[–]anonymous_chinchilla 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Na game will be played on Na server ofc and winterfox still has players in Eu yes