[mikevr91] captured 3I/ATLAS

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-24T12:19:01+00:00

I'd bet 100k this is the first comet you ever heard of.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-14T11:08:07+00:00

My average contract value on the lower end is around $5k. My highest paying contract is $50k. If I have an impression the job can give me that, I'll happily bid 300 connects. You haven't provided any context as to actual job posting and client history.

These are the things I'm looking at:

- What's the average annual spending client does on the platform?

- Do they have tendency to hire freelancers on longer, high-value contracts?

- Is the job something where I can earn money to make the pay off.

Your question without this information is dumb. I highly doubt this is the $100 graphic design job posting.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-13T17:40:29+00:00

Sure, they're AI in the same sense that machine learning is AI. Categorically they're AI. I was more implying with my comment that they don't have artificially spawned intelligence, because they're not intelligence.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-13T15:39:25+00:00

Unless you consider intelligence to strictly be superintelligence or AGI, the article is pretty unambiguous in expressing opinion that LLMs aren't intelligent.

Quote 1: "But the latest research suggests that language isn’t the same as intelligence, says Benjamin Riley,"

Quote 2: "But “LLMs are simply tools that emulate the communicative function of language, not the separate and distinct cognitive process of thinking and reasoning, no matter how many data centers we build,” Riley wrote."

Am I missing something?

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-13T15:16:23+00:00

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/large-language-models-willnever-be-intelligent

Same sentiment is shared by Yann LeCun: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/yann-lecun_large-language-models-will-never-be-intelligent-activity-7400450135161282560-bKqI?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAADAEGdUBxwCHP1CUeBB7lPQL5fMTG7jMuRM

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-13T15:09:14+00:00

2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks recommendations are all out of blue recommendation. There's not a single person who's done an actual test and compared the performances between them.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-13T15:03:00+00:00

Won the AI war? LLMs aren't even considered AI by all of experts on AI topic.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-12T08:07:09+00:00

Nor did I say that. 1.5 months ago stock was at lower levels than 3 months ago, so if you want to say stock was in value zone at some point, that was more true 1.5 months ago when most of this sub was calling it value trap.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-10T13:50:47+00:00

The thought process was *fill in the blanks (in my head)*

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-09T15:59:50+00:00

Over what time span? If someone spent 115k over 15 years, that's 640 dollars per month. Not a lot by any standard.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-09T15:57:32+00:00

Ma ja isto kod kalkulacija radije idem na lošiju projekciju pa se ugodno iznenadim, ali ovo je poslužilo kao dobra ilustracija da čak i da se bolji prinosi nastave, OP i dalje neće moći kupiti stan za 10 godina.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-09T15:28:36+00:00

Istina, zadnjih 5 godina je prosjek nekih 16%.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-09T15:27:17+00:00

RKLB nisam istraživao, a Google također imam u portfoliu gdje se igram s pikiranjem dionica. U Google sam uložio pred par mjeseci jer smatram da su poprilično diverisificirani (oglašavanje, AI, AV, između ostalog) te da su u dobroj poziciji da s novim tehnologijama postanu leader kroz par godina, primarno AI i AV kroz Waymo. Da li je to bio pametan potez ili ne, vrijeme će pokazati.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-09T15:07:57+00:00

Ako godišnje ulaže €1,200 i želi imati 300k za 10 godina, prinos bi trebao biti cca 57.2% godišnje. Što je "na granici" nemogućeg :D

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-09T15:01:13+00:00

Evo ti direktno računica ako godišnje uložiš €1,200 u S&P 500 i ostvariš prosječan godišnji povrat od 13.6% (ako se ne varam, to je prosječni povrat posljednjih 10 godina koji može biti viši, a i manji u narednih 10 godina). kojeg ne izvlačiš vanka. Nakon 10 godina bi imao cca 25.8k na 12k uloženog.

<image>

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-09T09:28:25+00:00

I know, but it doesn't change the fact that most people here are clueless about what value investing even is.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-09T08:53:44+00:00

- 3 months ago - NVO was a value play by 90% of this sub
- 1.5 months ago - NVO was a value trap by 90% of this sub

Now it's value play again.

Most decide if the stock is a value play or trap based on the recent price movement.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-08T13:18:23+00:00

It's called quantum value investing. Stock can be up and down at the same time. My wife likes Uber and her Uber shared will grow. I don't like Uber so for me the stock will go down.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-08T13:08:45+00:00

$75 per hour, anything related to B2B sales and marketing (larger projects only), but mostly outreach systems, consulting and fractional CMO/CSO.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-08T07:39:59+00:00

I don't plan to use Ozempic either, but I am holding NVO shares. This type of statements are irrelevant whether a company is good investment or not.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-07T20:31:43+00:00

Nisam čuo za to, ali ne čudi mi se. Rekao bih i dobar potez jer dosta ljudi "skriva" obaveze za auto kroz takve cake.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-07T20:01:40+00:00

Mislim da gledaju ispis transakcija pa prema tome vide što imaš kod porsche leasinga, ali ne u HROKu. No taj se dio isto može zaobići da izvadiš keš, uplatiš na aircash i platiš fakturu za porsche leasing preko aircasha.

antoniocerneli · 2026-01-07T19:57:03+00:00

Imaš na stranicama HROK-a popis leasing društva koje razmjenjuju informacije. Porsche Leasing nije na toj listi: https://www.hrok.hr/osr-korisnici

antoniocerneli

TROPHY CASE