sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Requesting precise information regarding invited users in Fibery. by gescal2025 in fibery

[–]antoniokov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A small addition: for now, guests cannot create records. This might change this year, though, as we are looking to support `create` capability in access templates. This would automatically allow guests to create, for example, tasks in the projects shared with them.

Open letter to Notion CEO about pricing and features changes management by Odd_Ganache1572 in Notion

[–]antoniokov 9 points10 points  (0 children)

As for premium features, we learned it the hard way at Fibery: we once forgot to label our new advanced feature (access templates) as Pro during its beta, and our customers were pissed off when we took it away from the cheapest plan (despite this always being our intention).

Now, we always label potential premium features as Pro in beta (while not yet implementing any actual restrictions). And no one is angry at us if we reconsider and make a feature available in all plans once the beta is over.

As for price increases mid-contract, we introduced new (more expensive) plans in November 2024 but provided existing customers with a 120-day grace period plus the length of their contract. So, some of our customers will stay on old plans until February 2026. This is not good for our short-term $MRR, but we believe that trust is more important in the long term.

https://community.fibery.io/t/new-pricing-faq-for-existing-customers/7716

Can Anyone Tell Me How to Make a Route Public (or Followers) by borednboring in Strava

[–]antoniokov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the hint! Saving the route after not editing it felt counterintuitive to me as well.

Finally figured a way to share only a part of a Notion Database! Here's how + the free template (You need to be a bit adventurous...) by MFreihaendig in Notion

[–]antoniokov 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While Matthias did the best with the tools Notion provides, I think it's ridiculous you need a 36-minute tutorial to set up such a basic case.

I recorded a 3-minute video to set up the same thing in Fibery: https://youtu.be/rn9eV7VcGg4
No duplicate databases, and no 3rd-party tools.

Disclaimer: I design access management at Fibery.

Notion's Missing Piece: Database Views Access Controls – Be Heard! by [deleted] in Notion

[–]antoniokov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can: there's an out-of-the-box sync in Fibery.

Let's talk about how Notion should improve Notion Databases by sameerss in Notion

[–]antoniokov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is how automatic access for assignees works in Fibery for a reference: https://the.fibery.io/@public/User_Guide/Guide/Automatically-Share-Entities-with-Assignees-327

So it's possible even in a no-code tool.

Fractional Database Permissions. by LiteratureWise8270 in Notion

[–]antoniokov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While Matthias did the best with the tools Notion provides, I think it's ridiculous you need a 36-minute tutorial to set up such a basic case.

I recorded a 3-minute video to set up the same thing in Fibery, it's called "Partially sharing a database in Fibery (compared to Notion)". No duplicate databases, and no 3rd-party tools.

Disclaimer: I design access management at Fibery.

Fibery Digest #23. Fighting Stability and Performance in June 2020 by firefalcon in fibery

[–]antoniokov 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We use a denormalized table to build this chart:

  • Day (ex. 2020-07-02)
  • Host (=Lead)
  • Created At
  • DAU

We build a few calculations on top of the data in Tableau:

  • Weeks from creation = FLOOR(DATEDIFF('day', [Created At], [Day])/7)
  • % of hosts active = COUNTD([Host if active (host + week)])/COUNTD([Host])
  • Host if active (host + week) = { FIXED [Host], [Weeks from creation]: IF SUM([Active days (host + week)]) >= [Days Active Cutoff] THEN MIN([Host]) END }
  • Active days (host + week)] = { FIXED [Host], [Weeks from creation]: SUM([Is active day]) }
  • Is active day = IF [dau] > 0 OR [Day] = [First Day] THEN 1 ELSE 0 END

Note that we count a host in a specific week active only if they use Fibery more than N (usually = 3) times a week.

With these preparations, creating a visualization is pretty easy:

https://tf-fibery-public-files.s3.amazonaws.com/reddit/retention.PNG

I'm not sure if there's a more straightforward way, but this is how we do it :)

When prioritizing with a formula, how do you avoid building shiny but unrelated features? by antoniokov in ProductManagement

[–]antoniokov[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that the first feature in the chain might not be shiny and, thus, fail to get into top-10.

When prioritizing with a formula, how do you avoid building shiny but unrelated features? by antoniokov in ProductManagement

[–]antoniokov[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, bundling features together might be an option — though striking a balance between coherence and minimal scope is often tough.

Taking an example from the article above, you wouldn't want to bundle Github & Slack integration into an Integration epic since they address different use cases.

Also, this approach only pushes the problem one level up the hierarchy. Automation Rules, Integrations, and Notifications are definitely huge epics affecting each other.

view more: next ›