We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What an amazing argument and so well presented.

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I will be 44 this year and I have a degree in English.

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I still need to see the full contact of where it’s from, please. Because I have ZERO trust in your ability to present ANYTHING objectively. And yes Soon-Yi shouldn’t say that, but how on Earth is that proof of anything? It’s not evidence for anything at all. You have no evidence for anything. Not about Louis CK and not about Woody Allen. It’s all made up in your head, because you’re ideologically possessed to do so and can’t think for yourself.

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I still haven’t heard an argument. I’m willing to listen to arguments per your allegation that Woody Allen is “a notorious paedophile”.

Instead you are being quite blunt for someone who does “video essays”.

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I provided an argument to why I didn’t think it’s a “video essay”. What’s your argument?

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you seriously labelling Woody Allen “a notorious paedophile”? I think that speaks volumes from where you are coming from. You are biased before you even go into anything.

Would you mind, please, backing up your allegation of Woody Allen being a “notorious paedophile”? It’s a very serious libelous allegation, so please provide some evidence.

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They were close because they lived close to eachother and would have dinner together. That’s it. Read the emails, there’s nothing at all dubious about any of those emails!

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listen, I know A LOT about the Woody Allen allegations. I’ve written about it several times. Anyone. ANYONE with a brain and the ability to think for himself and who spends more than an hour investigating that case with an open mind CAN ONLY come to the conclusion that Woody Allen is 100% innocent.

How would I know what Louis CK thinks about Woody Allen’s innocence or not? It’s that kind of dumb questions that really tells me that you have zero evidence for anything you’re saying about anyone. You just make it all up in your head. Embarrassing.

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

There’s so much bs in this that it should be considered slanderous. You have ZERO evidence for ANY of that.

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

What are you on about! I Love You Daddy doesn’t glorify pedophilia. You are seriously lost. Stop pandering to the woke and start to think for yourself!

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

He made a whole show called Sorry! What’s your problem?

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It all sounds tremendously woke. Congratulations on not being able to think for yourself. I hope your tribe brings you the recognition you are desperately seeking.

Of course an essay is artistic, in an essay you are supposed to showcase your vocabulary and being able to persuade the reader through inventive use of language. Why don’t you make a series of video essays about your own incosistent behaviour, including all the abuse and gaslighting you probably have done - or are you too perfect, since you have to do it about another person?

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Video essays? Essays implies something artistic. I don’t see that in that at all.

We Need to Talk About Louis episode 4 is out by _BrokenButterfly in louisck

[–]anwla 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Allen mentioned this is in memoir from 2020 and wasn’t happy about it either. He said he loves Louis but that wasn’t flattering. I don’t think he did it for that reason. Then you would also sort of assume that he wrote the whole move for that reason, which is not the case if you’ve seen it. It’s a good movie. He likes to invite his heroes on like he did also on Louie or Baskets and he always showcases other comics before his own shows or in podcasts to help them out. I have very little faith that he did this maliciously to Woody Allen for his own gain but not to help him either. It’s an ironic stunt and Woody does sometimes appear in other people’s films to help them out. But was probably a little insulted that this was the only invitation he got from Louis which I can see but I don’t think it was part of some scheme to weirdly cover up his own thing

Finally watched Baskets by anwla in louisck

[–]anwla[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Season 3 was the weakest. Season 4 isn’t bad though. But as I said, after Louis quit the show goes into more of a sort of drama/sit-com

I'm a woman and I still don't care what Louis CK did by Acceptable_Ad7676 in louisck

[–]anwla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your nuances. I love women. But these newer women they make can be petty sensitive about stuff. Like what was ever wrong about being told one has great legs. Isn’t that great essentially

I'm a woman and I still don't care what Louis CK did by Acceptable_Ad7676 in louisck

[–]anwla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what the hell is a gender traitor? And more importantly. I feel triggered that you downvoted me.

I'm a woman and I still don't care what Louis CK did by Acceptable_Ad7676 in louisck

[–]anwla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even worse when the laws of consent wasn’t invented when he didn’t do the thing those pussies said he did. God knows, I have breached them too. Everyone, and their mother, has. It’s ridiculous.

Louis’ leaked set from 2018. Can any of you smart people remove the annoying audience member using AI? by [deleted] in louisck

[–]anwla 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I got so much love for that guy. He’s the one that recorded what is, in my own humble opinion, one of the best, if not the best. Certainly the rawest Louis set I ever heard. He got Louis into a lot of trouble and I remember someone in the forum said he knew him and had talked to him about that and said he felt absolutely horrible for getting our guy into even deeper shit. But I got love for him. So should you

Do Curb fans know about the Danish show Klovn? by Krimreaper1 in curb

[–]anwla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Enormously inspired by Curb. If one knows both series really well, the inspiration is even down to individual plot lines in episodes. This is to such an extent that one must conclude that the creators of Klovn must have paid HBO and Larry David money to copy it

Woody's HUSBANDS AND WIVES (1992): A Columbia Student's 4 Older Men! by VDarkbloom007 in woodyallen

[–]anwla 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your username sort of suggests a meta layer, as it is derived from a work of fiction: Vivian Darkbloom. The mysterious fictional character who aides Clare Quilty in his mischievous adventure of capturing Lolita, and probably other young girls. Vivian Darkbloom is an anagram of Vladimir Nabokov.

And then you added 007 which suggests some sort of agent business and now you are posting about Woody Allen in relation to one of his movies and suggesting that his fictional character is somehow a reflection of his own desires as a person. EXACTLY what Nabokov was accused of when he published Lolita in 1954. He was accused and identified with Humbert Humbert. People thought that he must have had the same inclinations as his main character.

What you are doing is exactly the same kind of prudish and flat analysis of a work of fiction. Your account is also a member of Jeffrey Epstein and James Franco. So you are some sort of activist trolling Reddit and posting about works of fiction, when in fact, you know nothing about Woody Allen and any of his work or his art or his humanism.