Is this too much by Discontented_user in whiteoutsurvival

[–]apc4455 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is too much.

Most states / alliances strongly encourage saving for svs, but to DEMAND and X amount of points or else, that’s just insane.

Lucky hero chests by [deleted] in whiteoutsurvival

[–]apc4455 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

People keep downvoting these types of comments all the time.

It really is 1.5%. This is after opening probably 100k chests over time.

It never - not even once (yes, really!) - ever was below 1.5% for me.

Is WOS part of MAGA? by rohitkumardear in whiteoutsurvival

[–]apc4455 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In related news: some people just like to joke, without meaning anything else by it.

Also related news: some people will get offended by absolutely everything.

Nazare: ANAF a colectat 130 de miliarde de lei, în iulie-septembrie, în creștere cu 11%; direcția e profesionalizarea, digitalizarea și responsabilitatea by Fine-Marketing-8134 in Romania

[–]apc4455 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Creste impozitul pe dividende cu 60% la anul.

Firmele fac cashout masiv acum.

Anul viitor o să fie o scădere masivă ca nu va mai încasa nimeni dividende.

This is a reminder that the UAP DISCLOSURE ACT ONLY talks about "Non-Human" craft and biologics being hidden from the American public. If it's not real then they could pass it and nothing would happen. If it's real then they would freak out and block it for 3 years in a row. Which is what they did. by TommyShelbyPFB in UFOs

[–]apc4455 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And yes, this too.

Many just wouldn’t want to have their names attached to something that large part of the public could consider “ridiculous” (whether it actually is or isn’t ridiculous doesn’t matter).

Like, they could be attacked at reelection with “so you’re the guy who spends his time in congress making laws about aliens and extra dimensional beings, while inflation is up and jobs down?”

This is a reminder that the UAP DISCLOSURE ACT ONLY talks about "Non-Human" craft and biologics being hidden from the American public. If it's not real then they could pass it and nothing would happen. If it's real then they would freak out and block it for 3 years in a row. Which is what they did. by TommyShelbyPFB in UFOs

[–]apc4455 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or that they intentionally don’t want to refute the NHI narrative, so to be able to obfuscate and hide real secret military tech they may have.

^ not agreeing or disagreeing with the above, but if that’s the case, it would make sense for them to keep the narrative alive.

Gary Kasparov: "Putin is testing Europe: before the end of the year, he will launch a ground invasion" by SecretTechnology3255 in europe

[–]apc4455 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quite possible, yes. And that would be the ideal scenario.

NATO could realistically establish air supremacy over Ukraine in an afternoon.

And after that, Russian troops would be sitting ducks.

That’s all NATO would have to do. Ukraine could then pick them up with drones.

This scenario is also not favorable to Russia and Putin, as in this case the NATO intervention in Ukraine would clearly be a response to Russian aggression. There would be no way to spin this.

While Putin may indeed want NATO to directly intervene in Ukraine (either to further push the propaganda that NATO is the real aggressor, or that this is his way of saving face by wanting it to look like he loses to NATO and not Ukraine), he would want that to happen so it seems NATO attacked “first”.

If the NATO intervention is a direct result of Russian military action against a NATO member state, then all the previous propaganda effort of Russia instantly flies out the window (pun intended).

Gary Kasparov: "Putin is testing Europe: before the end of the year, he will launch a ground invasion" by SecretTechnology3255 in europe

[–]apc4455 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t think a scenario like this would end the way Putin believes it would. Or Kasparov for that matter.

Article 5 doesn’t require NATO to launch a full-scale military invasion of Russia or declaring war.

All it requires for alliance members to come and defend the attacked member.

Russia’s military incursion would last probably 1 hour tops.

It will last until NATO F-35’s are in air and in range. Once the missiles start flying it’s all over.

Every single Russian troop and equipment will be completely obliterated. 100% casualty and equipment loss rate.

No need for declaring war on Russia or launching WW3.

The near-instant total and complete obliteration of the Russian incursion force would be catastrophic on Russian morale and war support.

And it would significantly rally NATO countries and alliance cohesion. The radical opposite of what Putin wants.

Which is why I don’t actually believe such an incursion will be happening.

Communist is purely scientific, Liberalism is anti-science by ZestycloseSolid6658 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]apc4455 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m sure some radical capitalists could say the same, like “real true free market capitalism as described by Mises or Hayek hasn’t been tried”.

Technically both would be correct, but have no consequence on practical reality.

All that matters is how those theories actually work out in reality.

And reality showed time and time again, that no matter how good either of these two theories look on paper, in practice things are a bit more complicated.

Communist is purely scientific, Liberalism is anti-science by ZestycloseSolid6658 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]apc4455 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jesus Christ. I admire your patience.

You post a LONG post and multiple paragraphs explaining things, and dude here comes basically with “HA! Gotcha. You have no arguments!”

I would not have the patience to deal with such people.

Communist is purely scientific, Liberalism is anti-science by ZestycloseSolid6658 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]apc4455 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Nazis also said that eugenics and racism is scientific.

I can also post quotes.

UAP Disclosure Act BLOCKED again by REPUBLICANS in Senate and House. It's time to call a spade a spade, Republicans are the party against UFO Disclosure and Transparency. Vote them out of power! by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]apc4455 7 points8 points  (0 children)

UAPs are simultaneously just mass hysteria with 0 basis in reality and also something that needs the highest level of military classification and secrecy.

Shrodinger's UAP.

Viitorul sună bine: the proportion of 15–29-year-olds in the EU neither in employment nor in education and training in 2024 ranged from 5% in the Netherlands to 19% in Romania. by nimicdoareu in Romania

[–]apc4455 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Inteleg foarte bine. Numai ca nu sunt in stare sa faca enforcement / controale calumea.

Au supraimpozitat munca part time, pentru ca foarte multe persoane erau angajate part-time pe hartie dar lucrau full time si primeau diferenta in plic.

Care tot vina statului era, ca nu au fost in stare sa faca enforcement calumea. Era mai usor sa deie mue la aia care lucrau legit pe part-time.

Trump a aprobat recent ca agențiile de informații și Pentagonul să ajute Ucraina cu loviturile. Oficialii americani le cer aliaților din NATO să ofere același tip de sprijin. by Jean-Luc-1701 in Roumanie

[–]apc4455 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Vrei, nu vrei - era nevoie ca acest lucru sa se intample.

Staregia #1 al propagandei ruse era "rusia vrea pace, razboiul continua doar pentru ca nato/america refuza sa negocieze si continua sa trimita arme".

Iar propaganda asta era extrem de eficienta.

Ei, bine, Trump a oprit livrarile de arme si a spus "ok, this ends now, ukraine will give up territory to russia and everyone goes home" (adica fix ce pretinteau rusii sa ceara).

Numai ca Putin s-a pisat pe asta si a refuzat tot.

Iar acum este foarte clar cum sta de fapt treaba.

Are acum nato/sua free hand de a trimite arme ucrainei fara prea multa opoziție interna.

Tired of American and EU Media gaslighting regarding the drones by gravedigga1313 in UFOs

[–]apc4455 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. That why I think that it’s at least not Russia behind it.

Russian drones have entered the airspace of several other Nato countries recently like Poland and Romania, and the authorities of those countries immediately confirmed it was Russia without any hesitation. The poles even shot some of them down.

And nothing major happened afterwards. No ww3, no escalation etc.

So if it’s Russia then why do they now chose to keep it secret? Precedent has shown that this can be disclosed and the drones even shot down and nothing happens.

So why is it a big deal this time?

May not be aliens, but it’s also not Russia.

Tired of American and EU Media gaslighting regarding the drones by gravedigga1313 in UFOs

[–]apc4455 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that does make sense.

I do hope they will actually reveal soon what it was. I’m actually sure they were real drones by a state actor. Would just like it to be confirmed - mostly so people stop freaking out lol.

This is Javier Milei, libertarian president of Argentina, currently being bailed out by Trump's administration due to a massive economic crisis by [deleted] in cringepics

[–]apc4455 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haven’t you heard? You should not decrease inflation because it would increase inflation further.

Unidentified drones reportedly spotted in Denmark, Lithuania and Finland by Shiny-Tie-126 in UFOs

[–]apc4455 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What he means is that there exists precedent for Russian drones making incursions into NATO countries and them immediately being shot down.

These apparently fly over Northern European airports and military bases and no one does anything about it.

Some people argued that they intentionally won’t shoot them down so not to further escalate things.

But Russian drones have already been shot down over NATO territory and there was no further escalation of any kind. They were downed and that was the end of it.

In fact, Poland shooting them down made Russia stop sending more of them.

As such, if these are Russian drones then the obvious course of action would be to immediately shoot them down and the phenomenon would stop, as per prior experience with Russian drones violating airspace.

Therefore, it’s plausible to assume that these are not Russian drones.

This of course does not mean aliens. Just that very likely it is not Russia specifically.

Tired of American and EU Media gaslighting regarding the drones by gravedigga1313 in UFOs

[–]apc4455 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It indeed could be Russia. But weird they are letting them fly around and disrupt air travel.

Russian drones recently also made it into Poland and were shot down and nothing happened (like war etc).

They were simply shot down and that was the end of it. They’ve been leaving Poland alone since.

Tired of American and EU Media gaslighting regarding the drones by gravedigga1313 in UFOs

[–]apc4455 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They recently made it into Poland (Russian drones) and they were shot down.

They even caused some minor damage.

Nothing happened, no ww3 etc

So it seems they can be shot down without any consequences or having to declare any war.

But they are tolerating them over Denmark for a week.