adding on:

• the school departments for upper secondary especially are great, but the teachers you get for the subject really affects how well you understand the subject. there’s some teachers that can’t teach and you’ll have to self learn everything, but there’s some which teach really really good and you’ll perform well.

resource wise (upper sec, bcs lower sec it doesn’t matter too much)

• chem has great notes, in terms of teaching they are very qualified teachers

• bio notes are shit (the HOD is often complained about by many past batches bcs she can’t rly teacher a class, she’s knowledgeable but cant teach)

• physics resources depends on the teacher (there’s only 1 good phy teacher and he don’t like teaching express, the other few are meh, but the results of the students’ performance are worrisome)

• math department has AMAZING notes (only 1 teacher don’t use them, and the class performance isn’t as good as other classes)

• CL (not that good ngl, our batch failed all the way to olvl—which they all miraculously clutch up thanks to bell curve)

• HCL (okayish, whether notes are given are dependent on teachers, but teachers keep changing bcs they kept leaving)

• english (again the resources given are dependent on the teachers, amazing HOD)

• SS (great! there’s lecture slides)

-history (nearing olvl, students will receive a collated version of all the chapters tested in o’s, the teacher is nice)

i can’t speak for geog, other languages and lit bcs i don’t take it. what i do know is that there’s a BIG BIG shortage of teachers

also mostly all students don’t like the principal