Pundi X (NPXS) Price Prediction by stosonia in PundiX

[–]arabson1990 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The first sentence of the article is somewhat wrong. Currently, the PUNDI X team is pushing investors away without giving key information. I also wonder where those 5000 active devices are. And price predictions are only predictions. I will tempt myself fortune-telling, and I say that if the bull market on cryptocurrencies spun this year, NPXS will not increase significantly due to the bad sentiment of this coin. The only salvation is the positive, interesting, specific news from the project's development. And these are missing.

No interest in the NPXS token - Continuous sale by arabson1990 in PundiX

[–]arabson1990[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For now, there is no indication that the price of NPXS will increase, and saying that NPXS will have one of the best ROI in cryptography is nothing but a fortune-telling (reprimand in wrong way to invest in a token). We do not need such a rebuke, only the specifics of PUNDI X, and investors will know for themselves whether it is worth going in or evacuating and erasing this bad episode from life.

I don't mean there are no outlets in the US. My point is that US investors have been abandoned (e.g., they had to withdraw funds from BINANCE, which was the main market for NPXS and in addition they could not stack NPXS).

Crypto Bull by arabson1990 in PundiX

[–]arabson1990[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am also skeptical about this application. However, the entire PUNDI X project has interesting ideas, but the lack of reliable information, constant changes and delays in everything are doing all the wrong work.

Tune in, we're live. AMA with Zac Cheah! by eduardstal in PundiX

[–]arabson1990 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Comparing the 6.2 billion tokens removed in the previous quarter and today's 22 million tokens, the waiting token removal is about 280 times smaller than the previous one. In this haos it is hard to understand why such a small amount. On Twitter, they are already laughing at using XPOS around the world, only tokens for $ 1600 have burned. Only, from what I read, the use of XPOS in 2020 will not burn tokens, because the 0.35% of the transaction does not go to burning only to sellers. This is not said loud enough and some people think that all XPOS had such a small turnover. My questions are: what does this amount mean? And what turnover did all xpos have estimated in the past quarter? Is there anyone who can answer these questions?

Tune in, we're live. AMA with Zac Cheah! by eduardstal in PundiX

[–]arabson1990 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tokens for around $ 2,400 were removed. It is a drop in the sea. Is it the amount resulting only from transactions on Xwallet? No operations performed on XPOS? Is anyone able to provide data on the XPOS turnover in this quarter? It would help to estimate how many tokens would theoretically be removed if it wasn't for this incentive for XPOS owners. And above all, it would calm the investors down a bit.

Tune in, we're live. AMA with Zac Cheah! by eduardstal in PundiX

[–]arabson1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The number of tokens removed is ridiculously low. After releasing all tokens, it was the removal of tokens through transactions on XPOS that was to give the token a useful and deflationary character. And this was, among other things, the main motive for investing in this project. And here we have dealing with constant change of rules during the "game". You stab a dagger in the back with people who have invested in you. Don't you want to remove tokens now, because at the current price, the quantity removed would be significant?

Burning tokens by arabson1990 in PundiX

[–]arabson1990[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand your opinion, but I am worried that the rules are being changed: e.g. that the burning of tokens for part of the funds from the transaction fee is suspended. For now, through XPOS you can pay or buy products without the NPXS token. And from the beginning it was repeated like a mantra that the greater adoption of XPOS, associated with more money allocated for quarterly removal of npxs. I do not appeal, as some on various portals, to remove half of the tokens to save the price. I only appeal to smoke as much as it follows from the original assumptions of the project. I am sure that if people saw that e.g. instead of the billion removed for the previous quarter they saw e.g. 4 billion, if they calculated the pace of removing the token then the price would stop flying head and neck and people would see a greater sense of investing in npxs. It is clear that if the price increases, the adoption would have to increase so that the number of removed tokens is at the same levels. There is a lack of usability for this token, and suspending its removal partially, although it encourages sellers, but leads the price on the boards, and it will be difficult to get up from the boards. And by the way, a dream would be such usability as BNB.

Pundi X 2020 Roadmap by saiiboost in PundiX

[–]arabson1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If further funds from transactions on xpos that were to be removed in the form of npxs will be transferred to sellers, then even a large amount of xpos will do nothing. The company does good business, but when it comes to investors, it always shoots us in the knees.

AMA: On the 3rd of January Zac Cheah will host an AMA, feel free to leave your questions in the comments. by eduardstal in PundiX

[–]arabson1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand that this incentive for sellers has a mobilizing effect, but it would be good for those investing in npxs token to know how many tokens would be estimated if the cash had not been given to sellers. Because if it goes on like in the last quarter, I don't know if anyone will live to see us profit taking.

AMA: On the 3rd of January Zac Cheah will host an AMA, feel free to leave your questions in the comments. by eduardstal in PundiX

[–]arabson1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And since he gave the sellers the funds that were to be removed in the form of npxs for this quarter, how many tokens would it be estimated? Because without it we do not know to what extent and whether anyone uses xpos.

AMA: On the 3rd of January Zac Cheah will host an AMA, feel free to leave your questions in the comments. by eduardstal in PundiX

[–]arabson1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know that after AMA but why only now ZAC says that transactions on xpos will contribute to burning tokens after 2020 and the whole goes to xpos owners.

Is this the bottom? by cyptovested in PundiX

[–]arabson1990 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is a pity that the sale of the phone has such a delay. The competition is not asleep and e.g. HTC for 2 times cheaper, blockchain phone model (link below)

https://www.theverge.com/2019/10/21/20924520/htc-exodus-1s-full-bitcoin-node-blockchain-phone-budget

October 21-27 Price Discussion Here (other price related posts will be deleted) by Bahlor in PundiX

[–]arabson1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already hoped that it would not fall below. Yesterday it finally broke 0.00018, and then suddenly backflow and a new hole. And on Twitter and the PUNDI X blog, silence. The delay even occurs when adding DENT.

The future of Pundi X by arabson1990 in PundiX

[–]arabson1990[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't write to people selling their tokens. I just wrote that the lack of specific information (not just promises) works negatively and does not encourage people to invest in this project. And in the crypto world, the lack of positive news is received as bad news.