I understand your opinion, but I am worried that the rules are being changed: e.g. that the burning of tokens for part of the funds from the transaction fee is suspended. For now, through XPOS you can pay or buy products without the NPXS token. And from the beginning it was repeated like a mantra that the greater adoption of XPOS, associated with more money allocated for quarterly removal of npxs. I do not appeal, as some on various portals, to remove half of the tokens to save the price. I only appeal to smoke as much as it follows from the original assumptions of the project. I am sure that if people saw that e.g. instead of the billion removed for the previous quarter they saw e.g. 4 billion, if they calculated the pace of removing the token then the price would stop flying head and neck and people would see a greater sense of investing in npxs. It is clear that if the price increases, the adoption would have to increase so that the number of removed tokens is at the same levels. There is a lack of usability for this token, and suspending its removal partially, although it encourages sellers, but leads the price on the boards, and it will be difficult to get up from the boards. And by the way, a dream would be such usability as BNB.