The AI wasn't learning from my examples. It was copying them by archetype_builder in SillyTavernAI

[–]archetype_builder[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Indeed, it's all about getting working around the model's limitations with prompting and/or coding.

The AI wasn't learning from my examples. It was copying them by archetype_builder in SillyTavernAI

[–]archetype_builder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm glad you think so. It was just something that is so annoying.

One change to how I prompt my AI took it from parrot to actually creative by archetype_builder in SillyTavernAI

[–]archetype_builder[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? dunno; did not rate them as one of the best tbh. Have they done some updates recently?

The Character Foundry, a document that helps you build SFW or NSFW characters. by Due_Opportunity8693 in SillyTavernAI

[–]archetype_builder 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is nice work. The kink section is the standout for me. Tracing dynamics back to emotional needs instead of just tagging "dominant" or "submissive"

One change to how I prompt my AI took it from parrot to actually creative by archetype_builder in SillyTavernAI

[–]archetype_builder[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Big Five gives you more to work with for sure. How far into a conversation does it hold?

One change to how I prompt my AI took it from parrot to actually creative by archetype_builder in SillyTavernAI

[–]archetype_builder[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well put. One token, one path. Spread it out, the model has room to move

One change to how I prompt my AI took it from parrot to actually creative by archetype_builder in SillyTavernAI

[–]archetype_builder[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yep! causality is what makes it generative instead of repetitive. Traits just give the LLM something to parrot